Re: [Users] OVirt-Engine 3.3 RC - Add Fedora 19 host fails [SOLVED]

2013-09-16 Thread Thomas Suckow
On 09/13/2013 10:24 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Thomas Suckow wrote: Everything was completely broken until I disabled NetworkManager, it seemed to be doing something with the bridge despite NM_MANAGED=no Donna if it was only a copy/paste typo, but just in ase

Re: [Users] OVirt-Engine 3.3 RC - Add Fedora 19 host fails [SOLVED]

2013-09-13 Thread Thomas Suckow
On 09/04/2013 09:42 PM, Markus Stockhausen wrote: Hello, just in case someone else got this problem. For me it seems to be a naming convention problem. ifcfg file names did not match the shown interfaces. Steps to fix it included: - rename ifcfg-enp1s0, ... scripts to real interface names

Re: [Users] OVirt-Engine 3.3 RC - Add Fedora 19 host fails [SOLVED]

2013-09-13 Thread Gianluca Cecchi
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Thomas Suckow wrote: On 09/04/2013 09:42 PM, Markus Stockhausen wrote: Everything was completely broken until I disabled NetworkManager, it seemed to be doing something with the bridge despite NM_MANAGED=no Donna if it was only a copy/paste typo, but just

Re: [Users] OVirt-Engine 3.3 RC - Add Fedora 19 host fails [SOLVED]

2013-09-09 Thread Thomas Suckow
I was also noticing needing to muck with the network interfaces and services during the beta. I find it interesting the need to disable NetworkManager and enable the legacy network service. I found no reference to this in the documentation for 3.3 and people seem to be installing it without

Re: [Users] OVirt-Engine 3.3 RC - Add Fedora 19 host fails [SOLVED]

2013-09-09 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]quot; im Auftrag von quot;Thomas Suckow [thomas.suc...@pnnl.gov] Gesendet: Montag, 9. September 2013 18:58 An: users@ovirt.org Betreff: Re: [Users] OVirt-Engine 3.3 RC - Add Fedora 19 host fails [SOLVED] I was also noticing needing

Re: [Users] OVirt-Engine 3.3 RC - Add Fedora 19 host fails [SOLVED]

2013-09-04 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hello, just in case someone else got this problem. For me it seems to be a naming convention problem. ifcfg file names did not match the shown interfaces. Steps to fix it included: - rename ifcfg-enp1s0, ... scripts to real interface names ifcfg-p49p1, ... - remove parameter NAME from these