cluster", and it automagically gets done?
>
>Kinda sounds likely, but I'd like to set my expectations appropriately
>
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Jayme"
>To: "Philip Brown"
>Cc: "Strahil Nikolov" , "users"
>
&g
n set hosts, and multiple
>(arbitrariliy many) arbiter nodes?
>
You need 2 copies of the data, but 'replica 3' is most optimal.
>- Original Message -
>From: "Strahil Nikolov"
>To: "users" , "Philip Brown"
>Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2020 1:59:40
l Message -
From: "Jayme"
To: "Philip Brown"
Cc: "Strahil Nikolov" , "users"
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2020 3:03:39 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Re: mixed hyperconverged?
Your other hosts that aren’t participating in gluster storage would just
mount t
ultiple
> (arbitrariliy many) arbiter nodes?
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Strahil Nikolov"
> To: "users" , "Philip Brown"
> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2020 1:59:40 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Re: mixed hyperconverged?
>
> You can
ne arbiter.. is it instead
possible to have only 2 replication set hosts, and multiple (arbitrariliy many)
arbiter nodes?
- Original Message -
From: "Strahil Nikolov"
To: "users" , "Philip Brown"
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2020 1:59:40 PM
Subject: Re: [ovi
You can use a distributed replicated volume of type 'replica 3 arbiter 1'.
For example, NodeA and NodeB are contain replica set 1 with NodeC as their
arbiter and NodeD and NodeE as the second replica set 2 with NodeC as thir
arbiter also.
In such case you got only 2 copies of a single
arg. when I said "add 2 more nodes that arent part of the cluster", I meant,
"part of the glusterfs cluster".
or at minimum, maybe some kind of client-only setup, if they need access?
- Original Message -
From: "Philip Brown"
To: "users"
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2020 10:37:48 AM
7 matches
Mail list logo
