[ovirt-users] Re: multiple engines (active passive)

2019-01-21 Thread Sven Achtelik
Betreff: [ovirt-users] Re: multiple engines (active passive) real HA is complicated, no way around that... As stated earlier, we also run engine bare metal using pacemaker / corosync / drbd to keep both nodes in perfect sync, failover happens in a few seconds. We also do daily backups

[ovirt-users] Re: multiple engines (active passive)

2019-01-14 Thread Alex McWhirter
real HA is complicated, no way around that... As stated earlier, we also run engine bare metal using pacemaker / corosync / drbd to keep both nodes in perfect sync, failover happens in a few seconds. We also do daily backups of the engine, but in the 4 years or so that we have been running

[ovirt-users] Re: multiple engines (active passive)

2019-01-14 Thread maoz zadok
Well, I really love oVirt, but I don't know.. All the solutions mentioned here are complicated and or dangerous. Including hosted ha engine that fails while deploying(for me). I think that test the backup for recovery is very important and need to be done on a regular basis, What good is a backup

[ovirt-users] Re: multiple engines (active passive)

2019-01-14 Thread michael
I'm still sort of new to ovirt, but I went through a similar things. I had my original engine fail and had to recover, so here is my "oVirt HA plan" 1. I do NOT use hosted ovirt, I had issues getting it deployed correctly, and that doesn't help if they engine VM itself has issues. My engine

[ovirt-users] Re: multiple engines (active passive)

2019-01-14 Thread Simone Tiraboschi
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 9:40 PM wrote: > For what it's worth we do active passive with pacemaker, corosync, and > drbd. all the configuration files stay synced by drbd, pacemaker ensures > the services are only running on one node. Works pretty well. > For more demanding scenarios there is also

[ovirt-users] Re: multiple engines (active passive)

2019-01-13 Thread alex
For what it's worth we do active passive with pacemaker, corosync, and drbd. all the configuration files stay synced by drbd, pacemaker ensures the services are only running on one node. Works pretty well.On Jan 13, 2019 2:33 PM, maoz zadok wrote:is it good enough to disable the ovirt-engine

[ovirt-users] Re: multiple engines (active passive)

2019-01-13 Thread maoz zadok
is it good enough to disable the ovirt-engine "systemctl disable ovirt-engine" on the standby node? if it does, what about the other services, do I have to disable the following as well? : *ovirt-engine-dwhd.service enabled * *ovirt-engine.service

[ovirt-users] Re: multiple engines (active passive)

2019-01-13 Thread Mike
13.01.2019 10:47, Yedidyah Bar David пишет: Most people that need HA engine use ovirt-hosted-engine, HA hosted-engine cannot help if VM image are broken. HA runs same image on different nodes, and if current running VM corrupt FS, for example, it cannot run on other nodes also. I wrote

[ovirt-users] Re: multiple engines (active passive)

2019-01-12 Thread Yedidyah Bar David
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 10:56 PM maoz zadok wrote: > > Hello users, > After a painful experience with a crashed engine and a problematic recovery > from a backup, I was thinking to create one more engine in standby mode in > the same network, that will automatically recover backup files from