Hi everybody,
thank you for taking the time to share your experiences.
It seems we have now some stuff to digest and to do our tests. I think
I'll report back when things will settle down.
Best regards,
Giorgio.
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
>On that same note... I would love to deploy several Thin clients around my
>house using a single Centos Server for my kids to use.
>Is this still not possible?
>Do I still have to assign each of my kids a vm?
>Regards,
>--
>Fernando Fuentes
>ffuen...@txweather.org
Fernando, you can use LTSP for your solution. Check them out.
www.ltsp.org
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016, at 10:50 AM, Fernando Fuentes wrote:
> On that same note... I would love to deploy several Thin clients
> around my house using a single Centos Server for my kids to use.
> Is this still not
On Pá, 2016-06-17 at 10:33 +0200, Alexis HAUSER wrote:
> >we were looking for a prepackaged solution because of the lack of
> >human resources to devote to the project.
> >But if pursuing this research becomes too exhausting we would probably
> >develop a linux solution and in that case the kind
On that same note... I would love to deploy several Thin clients around
my house using a single Centos Server for my kids to use.
Is this still not possible?
Do I still have to assign each of my kids a vm?
Regards,
--
Fernando Fuentes
ffuen...@txweather.org
http://www.txweather.org
On
> On 15 Jun 2016, at 17:21, Giorgio Bersano wrote:
>
> 2016-06-15 12:26 GMT+02:00 Michal Skrivanek :
>>
>>> On 15 Jun 2016, at 12:18, Giorgio Bersano wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> I've been asked to deploy a
>we were looking for a prepackaged solution because of the lack of
>human resources to devote to the project.
>But if pursuing this research becomes too exhausting we would probably
>develop a linux solution and in that case the kind of terminal you
>suggested is interesting indeed.
Hi, I'm
2016-06-15 19:20 GMT+02:00 Gianluca Cecchi :
>
> Why not a nuc, or similar device from other vendors that are emerging?
> I don't know for the lan security part, but you can find a nuc5cpyh with
> celeron or nuc5ppyh with pentium respectively at 140 and 170 euros. Both
>
Il 15/Giu/2016 17:29, "Giorgio Bersano" ha
scritto:
>
> 2016-06-15 12:21 GMT+02:00 Donny Davis :
> > Do you have a requirement for 3d acceleration on the VDI guests?
>
> On the first deployment no, it is basically for frontend and backend
> office
2016-06-15 12:21 GMT+02:00 Donny Davis :
> Do you have a requirement for 3d acceleration on the VDI guests?
On the first deployment no, it is basically for frontend and backend
office activity.
But we would probably also asked to try it for multimedia activities
like casual
2016-06-15 12:56 GMT+02:00 Ondra Machacek :
> On 06/15/2016 12:26 PM, Michal Skrivanek wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 15 Jun 2016, at 12:18, Giorgio Bersano
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> I've been asked to deploy a VDI solution based on our oVirt
>>>
On 06/15/2016 12:26 PM, Michal Skrivanek wrote:
On 15 Jun 2016, at 12:18, Giorgio Bersano wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've been asked to deploy a VDI solution based on our oVirt infrastructure.
What we have in production is a 3.6 manager (standalone, not HE) with
a 3.5
> On 15 Jun 2016, at 12:18, Giorgio Bersano wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
> I've been asked to deploy a VDI solution based on our oVirt infrastructure.
> What we have in production is a 3.6 manager (standalone, not HE) with
> a 3.5 cluster (CentOS 6) and a 3.6 cluster
You can also use ansible to provision your 802.1x network gear along with
the client machines, this way everything is provisioned the same way every
time.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 6:21 AM, Donny Davis wrote:
> Do you have a requirement for 3d acceleration on the VDI guests?
Do you have a requirement for 3d acceleration on the VDI guests?
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Giorgio Bersano
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I've been asked to deploy a VDI solution based on our oVirt infrastructure.
> What we have in production is a 3.6 manager
Hi everyone,
I've been asked to deploy a VDI solution based on our oVirt infrastructure.
What we have in production is a 3.6 manager (standalone, not HE) with
a 3.5 cluster (CentOS 6) and a 3.6 cluster (CentOS 7), iSCSI storage,
fully redundant networking.
What is not clear to me is the client
16 matches
Mail list logo