Re: [ovirt-users] iSCSI and multipath deliberation

2017-03-16 Thread Pavel Gashev
Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 20:17 To: users <users@ovirt.org> Subject: [ovirt-users] iSCSI and multipath deliberation In my opionion the main problem in configuration iscsi and multipath is that the ovirt developers try to start everything automaticaly during installation, and then during s

[ovirt-users] iSCSI and multipath deliberation

2017-03-16 Thread Marcin Kruk
In my opionion the main problem in configuration iscsi and multipath is that the ovirt developers try to start everything automaticaly during installation, and then during start services like vdsmd. But during installation process adminstrator shoud choose the right multipath WWID identifier only.

Re: [ovirt-users] iSCSI and multipath

2014-07-07 Thread Gary Lloyd
Is there any chance of multipath working with direct LUN instead of just storage domains ? I've asked/checked a couple of times, but not had much luck. Thanks *Gary Lloyd* -- IT Services Keele University --- On 9 June 2014 15:17,

Re: [ovirt-users] iSCSI and multipath

2014-07-07 Thread Sven Kieske
Am 07.07.2014 10:17, schrieb Gary Lloyd: Is there any chance of multipath working with direct LUN instead of just storage domains ? I've asked/checked a couple of times, but not had much luck. Hi, the best way to get features into ovirt is to create a Bug titled as RFE (request for

Re: [ovirt-users] iSCSI and multipath

2014-07-07 Thread Gary Lloyd
Hi Sven Thanks My colleague has already tried to submit the code and I think it was Itamar we spoke with sometime in Oct/Nov 13. I think someone decided that the functionality should be driven from the engine itself rather than having it set on the vdsm nodes. I will see about putting in for a

Re: [ovirt-users] iSCSI and multipath

2014-07-07 Thread jplor...@gmail.com
Jul 2014 09:17:20 +0100 From: Gary Lloyd g.ll...@keele.ac.uk To: John Taylor jtt77...@gmail.com Cc: users users@ovirt.org Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] iSCSI and multipath Message-ID: caezlwnf5p_k2okhqds+ttalf2hne+vnf0_6r64lhfwqp-tu...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset

[ovirt-users] iSCSI and multipath

2014-06-09 Thread Nicolas Ecarnot
Hi, Context here : - 2 setups (2 datacenters) in oVirt 3.4.1 with CentOS 6.4 and 6.5 hosts - connected to some LUNs in iSCSI on a dedicated physical network Every host has two interfaces used for management and end-user LAN activity. Every host also have 4 additional NICs dedicated to the

Re: [ovirt-users] iSCSI and multipath

2014-06-09 Thread Maor Lipchuk
Hi Nicolas, Which DC level are you using? iSCSI multipath should be supported only from DC with compatibility version of 3.4 regards, Maor On 06/09/2014 01:06 PM, Nicolas Ecarnot wrote: Hi, Context here : - 2 setups (2 datacenters) in oVirt 3.4.1 with CentOS 6.4 and 6.5 hosts - connected

Re: [ovirt-users] iSCSI and multipath

2014-06-09 Thread Nicolas Ecarnot
Le 09-06-2014 13:55, Maor Lipchuk a écrit : Hi Nicolas, Which DC level are you using? iSCSI multipath should be supported only from DC with compatibility version of 3.4 Hi Maor, Oops you're right, my both 3.4 datacenters are using 3.3 level. I migrated recently. How safe or risky is it to

Re: [ovirt-users] iSCSI and multipath

2014-06-09 Thread Maor Lipchuk
basically, you should upgrade your DC to 3.4, and then upgrade the clusters you desire also to 3.4. You might need to upgrade your hosts to be compatible with the cluster emulated machines, or they might become non-operational if qemu-kvm does not support it. ether way, you can always ask for

Re: [ovirt-users] iSCSI and multipath

2014-06-09 Thread Nicolas Ecarnot
Le 09-06-2014 14:44, Maor Lipchuk a écrit : basically, you should upgrade your DC to 3.4, and then upgrade the clusters you desire also to 3.4. Well, that seems to have worked, except I had to raise the cluster level first, then the DC level. Now, I can see the iSCSI multipath tab has

Re: [ovirt-users] iSCSI and multipath

2014-06-09 Thread John Taylor
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Nicolas Ecarnot nico...@ecarnot.net wrote: Le 09-06-2014 14:44, Maor Lipchuk a écrit : basically, you should upgrade your DC to 3.4, and then upgrade the clusters you desire also to 3.4. Well, that seems to have worked, except I had to raise the cluster level