Re: [ovirt-users] iptables question

2014-07-15 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
quot;White Hat" > Cc: "users" > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 6:33:15 PM > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] iptables question > > Thanks. It is on my centos host which is located deep in my NW. > > > Regards, > Niklas > > > On 15 jul 2014, at 16:41, &

Re: [ovirt-users] iptables question

2014-07-15 Thread Dan Kenigsberg
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:33:16AM +, Niklas Fondberg wrote: > Hi all, > I have a simple question, is iptables if I never plan to use NAT:d guests? Could you rephrase the question? I, for one, did not underderstand it. ___ Users mailing list Users@ov

Re: [ovirt-users] iptables question

2014-07-15 Thread Niklas Fondberg
Thanks. It is on my centos host which is located deep in my NW. Regards, Niklas > On 15 jul 2014, at 16:41, "White Hat" wrote: > > Yes it can be disabled, but why not just add the rules you need to > make it work properly? > > Are you asking about iptables on the host or the guest? Are you

Re: [ovirt-users] iptables question

2014-07-15 Thread White Hat
Yes it can be disabled, but why not just add the rules you need to make it work properly? Are you asking about iptables on the host or the guest? Are you actually using firewalld, or is it really iptables? You can add a log statement before the reject rule in /etc/sysconfig/iptables to log a mes

Re: [ovirt-users] iptables question

2014-07-15 Thread Niklas Fondberg
Correction of my bad english... "can iptables be disabled if I never plan to use NAT:d guests?" ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[ovirt-users] iptables question

2014-07-15 Thread Niklas Fondberg
Hi all, I have a simple question, is iptables if I never plan to use NAT:d guests? Niklas ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users