Re: [ovirt-users] Engine reports

On 04/13/2018 05:12 AM, Peter Hudec wrote: thanks, problem was with the selinux. I applied the permission on the /var/lib/elasticsearch once again. Deployment is done ;) Excellent Right now mi browser is complaining about certificate on SSO. When I try to reach https://kibana. I'm

Re: [ovirt-users] Engine reports

thanks, problem was with the selinux. I applied the permission on the /var/lib/elasticsearch once again. Deployment is done ;) Right now mi browser is complaining about certificate on SSO. When I try to reach https://kibana. I'm redirected to SSO https:// :8443/oauth/authorize?... An error

Re: [ovirt-users] Engine reports

sudo ls -alrtF -Z /var/lib/elasticsearch oc logs logging-es-data-master-z6zbv4v2-2-deploy oc describe pod logging-es-data-master-z6zbv4v2-2-deploy sudo grep type=AVC /var/log/audit/audit.log | tail On 04/12/2018 02:32 AM, Peter Hudec wrote: back to this issue. something went wrong ;( The

Re: [ovirt-users] Engine reports

back to this issue. something went wrong ;( The status command got error. I'm not familiar with openshift, so the log processing will took me a while. [PROD] r...@dipostat01.cnc.sk: ~ # oc project logging Already on project "logging" on server "https://metrics.ovirt.cnc.sk:8443;. [PROD]

Re: [ovirt-users] Engine reports

Great! On 04/06/2018 04:43 PM, Peter Hudec wrote: Ansible playbook finished OK. The next step after weekend. thanks Peter On 06/04/2018 23:34, Rich Megginson wrote: On 04/06/2018 03:08 PM, Peter Hudec wrote: Hi, https://tools.apps.hudecof.net/paste/view/1d493d52

Re: [ovirt-users] Engine reports

Ansible playbook finished OK. The next step after weekend. thanks Peter On 06/04/2018 23:34, Rich Megginson wrote: > On 04/06/2018 03:08 PM, Peter Hudec wrote: >> Hi, >> >> https://tools.apps.hudecof.net/paste/view/1d493d52 >> >> The difference is >> - I used latest

Re: [ovirt-users] Engine reports

On 04/06/2018 03:08 PM, Peter Hudec wrote: Hi, https://tools.apps.hudecof.net/paste/view/1d493d52 The difference is - I used latest ansible 2.5 from PIPY source, since the RPM package do not fit requirements - I used GIT repo for openshift-ansible. I could start it over with the RPM based

Re: [ovirt-users] Engine reports

Hi, https://tools.apps.hudecof.net/paste/view/1d493d52 The difference is - I used latest ansible 2.5 from PIPY source, since the RPM package do not fit requirements - I used GIT repo for openshift-ansible. I could start it over with the RPM based openshift-ansible Peter On 06/04/2018

Re: [ovirt-users] Engine reports

I'm assuming you are running on a CentOS7 machine, recently updated to the latest base packages. Please confirm. Please provide the output of the following commands: sudo yum repolist sudo rpm -q ansible sudo yum repoquery -i ansible sudo rpm -q openshift-ansible sudo yum repoquery -i

Re: [ovirt-users] Engine reports

first issue is ansible version, could be solved by virtual env FATAL: Current Ansible version (2.4.2.0) is not supported. Supported versions: 2.4.3.0 or newer yum install -y python-virtualenv virtualenv ansible . ./ansible/bin/activate pip install -U pip setuptolls pip install -U pip setuptools

Re: [ovirt-users] Engine reports

Since it's still not installed, yes ;) On 05/04/2018 16:11, Rich Megginson wrote: > Is it possible that you could start over from scratch, using the latest > instructions/files at > https://github.com/ViaQ/Main/pull/37/files? > > On 04/05/2018 07:19 AM, Peter Hudec wrote: >> The version is from

Re: [ovirt-users] Engine reports

Is it possible that you could start over from scratch, using the latest instructions/files at https://github.com/ViaQ/Main/pull/37/files? On 04/05/2018 07:19 AM, Peter Hudec wrote: The version is from

Re: [ovirt-users] Engine reports

The version is from /usr/share/ansible/openshift-ansible/roles/openshift_facts/library/openshift_facts.py:get_openshift_version [PROD] r...@dipostat01.cnc.sk: /usr/share/ansible/openshift-ansible # /usr/bin/openshift version openshift v3.10.0-alpha.0+f0186dd-401 kubernetes v1.9.1+a0ce1bc657 etcd

Re: [ovirt-users] Engine reports

Hi, I have a updated the installation instructions for installing OpenShift 3.9, based on Rich's work , for the oVirt use case. Please make sure where you get the 3.10 rpm and disable that repo. This is the PR that includes the metrics store installation of OpenShift 3.9

Re: [ovirt-users] Engine reports

[PROD] r...@dipostat01.cnc.sk: /usr/share/ansible/openshift-ansible # repoquery -i origin Repository centos-openshift-origin is listed more than once in the configuration Name: origin Version : 3.7.2 Release : 1.el7.git.0.f0186dd Architecture: x86_64 Size: 957727742

Re: [ovirt-users] Engine reports

I'm sorry.  I misunderstood the request. We are in the process of updating the instructions for installing viaq logging based on upstream origin 3.9 - https://github.com/ViaQ/Main/pull/37 In the meantime, you can follow along on that PR, and we will have instructions very soon. On

Re: [ovirt-users] Engine reports

On 04/04/2018 08:22 AM, Shirly Radco wrote: -- SHIRLY RADCO BI SeNIOR SOFTWARE ENGINEER Red Hat Israel TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 5:07 PM, Peter Hudec

Re: [ovirt-users] Engine reports

-- SHIRLY RADCO BI SeNIOR SOFTWARE ENGINEER Red Hat Israel TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 5:07 PM, Peter Hudec wrote: > almost the same issue, the versio for openshoft release changed

Re: [ovirt-users] Engine reports

almost the same issue, the versio for openshoft release changed to 3.9 Failure summary: 1. Hosts:localhost Play: Determine openshift_version to configure on first master Task: For an RPM install, abort when the release requested does not match the available version.

Re: [ovirt-users] Engine reports

Hi SHIRLY, I had clean server before installing. I will try to follow your advice. Peter On 04/04/2018 14:17, Shirly Radco wrote: > Hi Peter, > > The installation instructions currently support OpenShift 3.6. > > I'm now working on updating them to support 3.9. > > You currently have

Re: [ovirt-users] Engine reports

Adding Nicolas since he hit the same issue. -- SHIRLY RADCO BI SeNIOR SOFTWARE ENGINEER Red Hat Israel TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:17 PM, Shirly Radco wrote: > Hi Peter, > >

Re: [ovirt-users] Engine reports

Hi Peter, The installation instructions currently support OpenShift 3.6. I'm now working on updating them to support 3.9. You currently have 3.10 installed. Please install OpenShift 3.9 using this repository https://github.com/ViaQ/Main/blob/master/centos7-viaq.repo And add the following file

Re: [ovirt-users] Engine reports

Shirly, can you take a look? On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Peter Hudec wrote: > Tried to install ovirt metrics, but got error > > ANSIBLE_LOG_PATH=/tmp/ansible.log ansible-playbook -vvv -e > @/root/vars.yaml -i /root/ansible-inventory-origin-37-aio > playbooks/byo/config.yml >

Re: [ovirt-users] Engine reports

Tried to install ovirt metrics, but got error ANSIBLE_LOG_PATH=/tmp/ansible.log ansible-playbook -vvv -e @/root/vars.yaml -i /root/ansible-inventory-origin-37-aio playbooks/byo/config.yml 1. Hosts:localhost Play: Determine openshift_version to configure on first master Task:

Re: [ovirt-users] Engine reports

Hi, Check these links: https://ovirt.org/blog/2018/01/ovirt-report-using-grafana/ https://ovirt.org/develop/release-management/features/metrics/metrics-store/ Regards, Fred On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 9:38 AM, Anantha Raghava < rag...@exzatechconsulting.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I see that oVirt DWH

Re: [ovirt-users] engine-reports portal and cpu cores

On 05/13/2015 10:49 AM, Alexandr Krivulya wrote: Ок, I understand it. But in admin portal on hosts detail tab I see for example 32 logical cores vs 16 in reports because of Hyper-Threading enabled. All VM's on this host consumes 26 vCores. Does it overallocation? According to report - yes, but

Re: [ovirt-users] engine-reports portal and cpu cores

Ок, I understand it. But in admin portal on hosts detail tab I see for example 32 logical cores vs 16 in reports because of Hyper-Threading enabled. All VM's on this host consumes 26 vCores. Does it overallocation? According to report - yes, but actually I think not. Can you clarify? 13.05.2015