Re: [Users] Node Problems

2012-08-21 Thread Dominic Kaiser 
Ok.  So none of the node builds work?  What node builds work with 3.1?  Can
I use older nodes built under fedora 16 on hosts in 3.1?

Dominic
On Aug 21, 2012 4:31 PM, "Mike Burns"  wrote:

> On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 16:27 -0400, Dominic Kaiser wrote:
> > Hey All,
> >
> >
> > I know this has been brought up before but I am using
> > ovirt-node-iso-2.5.0-2.0.fc17.iso I have added this node and have
> > brought up fiber channel main storage on it.  I for the life of me can
> > not add an nfs ISO or a Export domain.  It is not running a 3.5 kernel
> > and I have mounted these on another node running fc17.  This makes no
> > sense.  There is no error while adding an import domain ISO or Export
> > domain the spinning wheel stays spinning.  I have left it for a full
> > day and still spinning.  Is there a node ISP that works on 3.1 with
> > nfs?
>
> Hi Dominic,
>
> There is something broken currently with the latest node builds with
> NFS.  We're currently blocked on a kernel bug from testing any patches,
> but it's something we hope to have resolved soon.
>
> Mike
>
> >
> > Dominic
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dominic Kaiser
> > Greater Boston Vineyard
> > Director of Operations
> >
> > cell: 617-230-1412
> > fax: 617-252-0238
> > email: domi...@bostonvineyard.org
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Users mailing list
> > Users@ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] Node Problems

2012-08-21 Thread Mike Burns 
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 16:27 -0400, Dominic Kaiser wrote:
> Hey All,
> 
> 
> I know this has been brought up before but I am using
> ovirt-node-iso-2.5.0-2.0.fc17.iso I have added this node and have
> brought up fiber channel main storage on it.  I for the life of me can
> not add an nfs ISO or a Export domain.  It is not running a 3.5 kernel
> and I have mounted these on another node running fc17.  This makes no
> sense.  There is no error while adding an import domain ISO or Export
> domain the spinning wheel stays spinning.  I have left it for a full
> day and still spinning.  Is there a node ISP that works on 3.1 with
> nfs?

Hi Dominic,

There is something broken currently with the latest node builds with
NFS.  We're currently blocked on a kernel bug from testing any patches,
but it's something we hope to have resolved soon.

Mike

> 
> Dominic
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dominic Kaiser
> Greater Boston Vineyard
> Director of Operations
> 
> cell: 617-230-1412
> fax: 617-252-0238
> email: domi...@bostonvineyard.org
> 
> 
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[Users] Node Problems

2012-08-21 Thread Dominic Kaiser 
Hey All,

I know this has been brought up before but I am
using ovirt-node-iso-2.5.0-2.0.fc17.iso I have added this node and have
brought up fiber channel main storage on it.  I for the life of me can not
add an nfs ISO or a Export domain.  It is not running a 3.5 kernel and I
have mounted these on another node running fc17.  This makes no sense.
There is no error while adding an import domain ISO or Export domain the
spinning wheel stays spinning.  I have left it for a full day and still
spinning.  Is there a node ISP that works on 3.1 with nfs?

Dominic

-- 
Dominic Kaiser
Greater Boston Vineyard
Director of Operations

cell: 617-230-1412
fax: 617-252-0238
email: domi...@bostonvineyard.org
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] oVirt with UPS Shutdown Software

2012-08-21 Thread Itamar Heim 

On 08/21/2012 07:01 PM, Omer Frenkel wrote:



- Original Message -

From: "Neil" 
To: users@ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 6:05:17 PM
Subject: [Users] oVirt with UPS Shutdown Software

Hi guys,

I've looked around briefly and can't seem to find much info on this,
so please excuse me if this has already been asked/documented.

I have a UPS with SNMP support and I started installing the
management
software(IPP) that it comes with and then it occurred to me that the
shutdown sequence of servers with oVirt 3.1 would be quite critical.
Is there any documentation on shut down sequences or does anyone know
what the recommended way of handling power failures are?

My thinking is that when a power failure is detected by the UPS
software running on the ovirt-engine machine, the VM's need to be
shutdown gracefully, and then the data center needs to be put into
maintenance, before the hosts are eventually shutdown, and then
finally the ovirt-engine needs to be halted.



sounds right to me:
shutdown the vms,
put data-center to maintenance (actually means put all domains to maintenance - 
i guess this part is nice to have but not must)
then put hosts to maintenance (not sure you mentioned that)
then you can shutdown any server in any order.


why move the DC to maint or the host to maint (unless other hosts are 
not affected by this)?





Any thoughts or ideas/suggestions on the above, can the ovirt-engine
somehow be told to shutdown the VM's and hosts etc?



well writing a script to do that shouldn't be hard using the API,
but the question how to trigger it? (i'm not familiar with the UPS software 
capabilities)


Thank you very much.

Regards.

Neil Wilson.
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users




___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] oVirt with UPS Shutdown Software

2012-08-21 Thread Omer Frenkel 


- Original Message -
> From: "Neil" 
> To: users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 6:05:17 PM
> Subject: [Users] oVirt with UPS Shutdown Software
> 
> Hi guys,
> 
> I've looked around briefly and can't seem to find much info on this,
> so please excuse me if this has already been asked/documented.
> 
> I have a UPS with SNMP support and I started installing the
> management
> software(IPP) that it comes with and then it occurred to me that the
> shutdown sequence of servers with oVirt 3.1 would be quite critical.
> Is there any documentation on shut down sequences or does anyone know
> what the recommended way of handling power failures are?
> 
> My thinking is that when a power failure is detected by the UPS
> software running on the ovirt-engine machine, the VM's need to be
> shutdown gracefully, and then the data center needs to be put into
> maintenance, before the hosts are eventually shutdown, and then
> finally the ovirt-engine needs to be halted.
>

sounds right to me:
shutdown the vms,
put data-center to maintenance (actually means put all domains to maintenance - 
i guess this part is nice to have but not must)
then put hosts to maintenance (not sure you mentioned that)
then you can shutdown any server in any order.
 
> Any thoughts or ideas/suggestions on the above, can the ovirt-engine
> somehow be told to shutdown the VM's and hosts etc?
> 

well writing a script to do that shouldn't be hard using the API,
but the question how to trigger it? (i'm not familiar with the UPS software 
capabilities)

> Thank you very much.
> 
> Regards.
> 
> Neil Wilson.
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] oVirt with UPS Shutdown Software

2012-08-21 Thread Itamar Heim 

On 08/21/2012 06:05 PM, Neil wrote:

Hi guys,

I've looked around briefly and can't seem to find much info on this,
so please excuse me if this has already been asked/documented.

I have a UPS with SNMP support and I started installing the management
software(IPP) that it comes with and then it occurred to me that the
shutdown sequence of servers with oVirt 3.1 would be quite critical.
Is there any documentation on shut down sequences or does anyone know
what the recommended way of handling power failures are?

My thinking is that when a power failure is detected by the UPS
software running on the ovirt-engine machine, the VM's need to be
shutdown gracefully, and then the data center needs to be put into
maintenance, before the hosts are eventually shutdown, and then
finally the ovirt-engine needs to be halted.


wouldn't the hosts have some detection they are going to be shutdown via 
a ups event to them, rather than to the engine?
if you know a host is going to go down, would be nice if you either move 
it to maintenance, or stop all VMs on it, or migrate all VMs from it 
(depending on how global the shutdown is going to be).
if you go with moving it to maintenance, you would also need to activate 
it later of course.




Any thoughts or ideas/suggestions on the above, can the ovirt-engine
somehow be told to shutdown the VM's and hosts etc?


you can also script this via the API/SDK/CLI based on a monitoring 
system getting the UPS event




Thank you very much.

Regards.

Neil Wilson.
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users




___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[Users] oVirt with UPS Shutdown Software

2012-08-21 Thread Neil 
Hi guys,

I've looked around briefly and can't seem to find much info on this,
so please excuse me if this has already been asked/documented.

I have a UPS with SNMP support and I started installing the management
software(IPP) that it comes with and then it occurred to me that the
shutdown sequence of servers with oVirt 3.1 would be quite critical.
Is there any documentation on shut down sequences or does anyone know
what the recommended way of handling power failures are?

My thinking is that when a power failure is detected by the UPS
software running on the ovirt-engine machine, the VM's need to be
shutdown gracefully, and then the data center needs to be put into
maintenance, before the hosts are eventually shutdown, and then
finally the ovirt-engine needs to be halted.

Any thoughts or ideas/suggestions on the above, can the ovirt-engine
somehow be told to shutdown the VM's and hosts etc?

Thank you very much.

Regards.

Neil Wilson.
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] Next Release Planning

2012-08-21 Thread Ryan Harper 
* Mike Burns  [2012-08-21 09:25]:
> On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 09:10 -0500, Ryan Harper wrote:
> > > > Trying to think of some way to catch the "broken ISO" problem that 3.1
> > > > has with NFS storage.  So, something similar doesn't occur again in
> > > > future.
> > > > 
> > > > Any ideas?
> > > 
> > > Yes, this makes a lot of sense to me.  We should make an end-to-end
> > > sanity test with all components part of the release criteria.
> > 
> > I haven't seen much discussion around testing the complete stack as a
> > whole.  I'm wondering if the all-in-one build makes a good platform to
> > build stack testing against?
> > 
> > I don't really enjoying fixing up jboss or selinux or various other
> > tweaks on test day when installing from scratch (though that does find
> > some bugs), so all-in-one seems like a good sanity check.
> > 
> > From there, building/writing some tests using either engine-cli, or
> > the ovirt-sdk python bindings seems like a good way to exercise the
> > function of the release.
> > 
> > With the nested mode supported, would it be possible to have a jenkins
> > job run a test that booted the all-in-one iso and ran some tests against
> > that?
> > 
> 
> Just want to point out that ^^ wouldn't catch that ovirt-node is
> un-usable due to a kernel/vdsm bug.  allinone testing is a good idea to
> catch many issues, but we need to be running some sort of end-to-end
> testing with ovirt-node as well.

Booting the image is the starting point.  One of the tests to run on-top
of an all-in-one would be attempting adding an NFS export domain from
localhost.  And the list goes on.  Depending on the complexity of the
tests, it may not lend itself to a jenkins job, but I think approach of
writing engine level FVT and running it against the all-in-one is sound.


-- 
Ryan Harper
Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
ry...@us.ibm.com

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] Next Release Planning

2012-08-21 Thread Mike Burns 
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 09:10 -0500, Ryan Harper wrote:
> * Mike Burns  [2012-08-21 07:29]:
> > On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 19:52 +1000, Justin Clift wrote:
> > > On 20/08/2012, at 10:02 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > > 
> > > > Now that oVirt 3.1 has shipped, we need to start the planning process
> > > > for the next release.  One of the major topics for this week's weekly
> > > > sync is to review the release criteria.  
> > > > 
> > > > The criteria we used for 3.1 is laid out on the wiki [1].  I will be
> > > > posting an equivalent version for the next release in the next couple
> > > > days, but it will mostly be copy/paste from this page.  
> > > > 
> > > > Please think about release criteria and whether or not we want to
> > > > add/remove/change things for this release.  This needs to be determined
> > > > now to make sure that the release process runs smoother down the line.
> > > 
> > > Is there some way we can do an end-to-end platform test for most
> > > of the things mentioned there, to sanity check the binaries before
> > > announcement?
> > > 
> > > Trying to think of some way to catch the "broken ISO" problem that 3.1
> > > has with NFS storage.  So, something similar doesn't occur again in
> > > future.
> > > 
> > > Any ideas?
> > 
> > Yes, this makes a lot of sense to me.  We should make an end-to-end
> > sanity test with all components part of the release criteria.
> 
> I haven't seen much discussion around testing the complete stack as a
> whole.  I'm wondering if the all-in-one build makes a good platform to
> build stack testing against?
> 
> I don't really enjoying fixing up jboss or selinux or various other
> tweaks on test day when installing from scratch (though that does find
> some bugs), so all-in-one seems like a good sanity check.
> 
> From there, building/writing some tests using either engine-cli, or
> the ovirt-sdk python bindings seems like a good way to exercise the
> function of the release.
> 
> With the nested mode supported, would it be possible to have a jenkins
> job run a test that booted the all-in-one iso and ran some tests against
> that?
> 

Just want to point out that ^^ wouldn't catch that ovirt-node is
un-usable due to a kernel/vdsm bug.  allinone testing is a good idea to
catch many issues, but we need to be running some sort of end-to-end
testing with ovirt-node as well.

Mike

> 
> > 
> > Mike
> > 
> > > 
> > > Regards and best wishes,
> > > 
> > > Justin Clift
> > > 
> > > > Thanks
> > > > 
> > > > Mike
> > > > 
> > > > [1] http://wiki.ovirt.org/wiki/Second_Release
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > ___
> > > > Users mailing list
> > > > Users@ovirt.org
> > > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Aeolus Community Manager
> > > http://www.aeolusproject.org
> > > 
> > > ___
> > > Users mailing list
> > > Users@ovirt.org
> > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > Board mailing list
> > bo...@ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/board
> 


___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] Next Release Planning

2012-08-21 Thread Ryan Harper 
* Mike Burns  [2012-08-21 07:29]:
> On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 19:52 +1000, Justin Clift wrote:
> > On 20/08/2012, at 10:02 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > Now that oVirt 3.1 has shipped, we need to start the planning process
> > > for the next release.  One of the major topics for this week's weekly
> > > sync is to review the release criteria.  
> > > 
> > > The criteria we used for 3.1 is laid out on the wiki [1].  I will be
> > > posting an equivalent version for the next release in the next couple
> > > days, but it will mostly be copy/paste from this page.  
> > > 
> > > Please think about release criteria and whether or not we want to
> > > add/remove/change things for this release.  This needs to be determined
> > > now to make sure that the release process runs smoother down the line.
> > 
> > Is there some way we can do an end-to-end platform test for most
> > of the things mentioned there, to sanity check the binaries before
> > announcement?
> > 
> > Trying to think of some way to catch the "broken ISO" problem that 3.1
> > has with NFS storage.  So, something similar doesn't occur again in
> > future.
> > 
> > Any ideas?
> 
> Yes, this makes a lot of sense to me.  We should make an end-to-end
> sanity test with all components part of the release criteria.

I haven't seen much discussion around testing the complete stack as a
whole.  I'm wondering if the all-in-one build makes a good platform to
build stack testing against?

I don't really enjoying fixing up jboss or selinux or various other
tweaks on test day when installing from scratch (though that does find
some bugs), so all-in-one seems like a good sanity check.

>From there, building/writing some tests using either engine-cli, or
the ovirt-sdk python bindings seems like a good way to exercise the
function of the release.

With the nested mode supported, would it be possible to have a jenkins
job run a test that booted the all-in-one iso and ran some tests against
that?


> 
> Mike
> 
> > 
> > Regards and best wishes,
> > 
> > Justin Clift
> > 
> > > Thanks
> > > 
> > > Mike
> > > 
> > > [1] http://wiki.ovirt.org/wiki/Second_Release
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ___
> > > Users mailing list
> > > Users@ovirt.org
> > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > 
> > --
> > Aeolus Community Manager
> > http://www.aeolusproject.org
> > 
> > ___
> > Users mailing list
> > Users@ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> 
> ___
> Board mailing list
> bo...@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/board

-- 
Ryan Harper
Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
ry...@us.ibm.com

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] Next Release Planning

2012-08-21 Thread Mike Burns 
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 19:52 +1000, Justin Clift wrote:
> On 20/08/2012, at 10:02 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Now that oVirt 3.1 has shipped, we need to start the planning process
> > for the next release.  One of the major topics for this week's weekly
> > sync is to review the release criteria.  
> > 
> > The criteria we used for 3.1 is laid out on the wiki [1].  I will be
> > posting an equivalent version for the next release in the next couple
> > days, but it will mostly be copy/paste from this page.  
> > 
> > Please think about release criteria and whether or not we want to
> > add/remove/change things for this release.  This needs to be determined
> > now to make sure that the release process runs smoother down the line.
> 
> Is there some way we can do an end-to-end platform test for most
> of the things mentioned there, to sanity check the binaries before
> announcement?
> 
> Trying to think of some way to catch the "broken ISO" problem that 3.1
> has with NFS storage.  So, something similar doesn't occur again in
> future.
> 
> Any ideas?

Yes, this makes a lot of sense to me.  We should make an end-to-end
sanity test with all components part of the release criteria.

Mike

> 
> Regards and best wishes,
> 
> Justin Clift
> 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > Mike
> > 
> > [1] http://wiki.ovirt.org/wiki/Second_Release
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > Users mailing list
> > Users@ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> --
> Aeolus Community Manager
> http://www.aeolusproject.org
> 
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] Fwd: Trouble with SSO rhev-agent and rhev-agent-pam-rhev-cred

2012-08-21 Thread Artem 
Hi,

i don't have /var/log/ovirt-guest-agent.log, i have
/var/log/rhev-agent/rhev-agent.log.

i set in /etc/rhev-agent.conf

...
[logger_root]
level=DEBUG
...

but log file output

...
Dummy-2::DEBUG::2012-08-21
15:09:56,698::vdsAgentLogic::160::root::AgentLogicBase::sendUserInfo -
cur_user = 'root'
Dummy-2::DEBUG::2012-08-21
15:10:06,719::vdsAgentLogic::160::root::AgentLogicBase::sendUserInfo -
cur_user = 'root'
Dummy-2::DEBUG::2012-08-21
15:10:16,739::vdsAgentLogic::160::root::AgentLogicBase::sendUserInfo -
cur_user = 'root'
Dummy-2::DEBUG::2012-08-21
15:10:26,836::vdsAgentLogic::160::root::AgentLogicBase::sendUserInfo -
cur_user = 'root'
Dummy-2::DEBUG::2012-08-21
15:10:36,857::vdsAgentLogic::160::root::AgentLogicBase::sendUserInfo -
cur_user = 'root'


I cannot build ovirt-guest-agent for Centos 6 (aka Rhel 6) and used
rhev-agent and rhev-agent-pam-rhev-cred.

hmm..

>> Linux machine is not configure to work with the same authentication
server

~]# getent passwd sirin
sirin:*:19321:19321:sirin zarin:/home/sirin:/bin/sh

User sirin used FreeIPA.

Artem

2012/8/20 Gal Hammer 

> On 20/08/2012 08:31, Roy Golan wrote:
>
>  Cannot login with SSO on system...
>>
>> cat /var/log/secure
>>
>> Aug 19 03:54:43 ws2 pam: gdm-rhevcred[2618]:
>> pam_unix(gdm-rhevcred:auth): conversation failed
>> Aug 19 03:54:43 ws2 pam: gdm-rhevcred[2618]:
>> pam_unix(gdm-rhevcred:auth): auth could not identify password for
>> [sirin]
>> Aug 19 03:54:43 ws2 pam: gdm-rhevcred[2618]:
>> pam_sss(gdm-rhevcred:auth): system info: [Cannot read password]
>> Aug 19 03:54:43 ws2 pam: gdm-rhevcred[2618]:
>> pam_sss(gdm-rhevcred:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0
>> euid=0 tty=:0 ruser= rhost= user=sirin
>> Aug 19 03:54:43 ws2 pam: gdm-rhevcred[2618]:
>> pam_sss(gdm-rhevcred:auth): received for user sirin: 4 (System error)
>> Aug 19 03:54:43 ws2 pam: gdm-password[2617]:
>> pam_unix(gdm-password:auth): conversation failed
>> Aug 19 03:54:43 ws2 pam: gdm-password[2617]:
>> pam_unix(gdm-password:auth): auth could not identify password for
>> [sirin]
>> Aug 19 03:54:43 ws2 pam: gdm-password[2617]:
>> pam_sss(gdm-password:auth): system info: [Cannot read password]
>> Aug 19 03:54:43 ws2 pam: gdm-password[2617]:
>> pam_sss(gdm-password:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0
>> euid=0 tty=:0 ruser= rhost= user=sirin
>> Aug 19 03:54:43 ws2 pam: gdm-password[2617]:
>> pam_sss(gdm-password:auth): received for user sirin: 4 (System error)
>> Aug 19 03:54:43 ws2 pam: gdm-password[2617]: gkr-pam: no password is
>> available for user
>>
>> But login with user and password done... I use FreeIPA for this user.
>>
>> What could be wrong?
>>
>
> What does the agent's log say (/var/log/ovirt-guest-agent.**log)?
>
> Usually, if everything is running as it should, the problem is that the
> Linux machine is not configure to work with the same authentication server
> as the one that the RHEV-M is using.
>
> Gal.
>
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] Next Release Planning

2012-08-21 Thread Justin Clift 
On 20/08/2012, at 10:02 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Now that oVirt 3.1 has shipped, we need to start the planning process
> for the next release.  One of the major topics for this week's weekly
> sync is to review the release criteria.  
> 
> The criteria we used for 3.1 is laid out on the wiki [1].  I will be
> posting an equivalent version for the next release in the next couple
> days, but it will mostly be copy/paste from this page.  
> 
> Please think about release criteria and whether or not we want to
> add/remove/change things for this release.  This needs to be determined
> now to make sure that the release process runs smoother down the line.

Is there some way we can do an end-to-end platform test for most
of the things mentioned there, to sanity check the binaries before
announcement?

Trying to think of some way to catch the "broken ISO" problem that 3.1
has with NFS storage.  So, something similar doesn't occur again in
future.

Any ideas?

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

> Thanks
> 
> Mike
> 
> [1] http://wiki.ovirt.org/wiki/Second_Release
> 
> 
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

--
Aeolus Community Manager
http://www.aeolusproject.org

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] Issues with NFS d­omains and kernel-3.5.0-2­.f17

2012-08-21 Thread ovirt 
problem also exist with 3.5.2-1.fc17.x86_64 kernel

# uname -a
Linux kvm04 3.5.2-1.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Aug 15 16:09:27 UTC 2012 x86_64 
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
# rpm -q vdsm
vdsm-4.10.0-0.331.git69d730d.fc17.x86_64

iso nfs domain d2221cee-7146-4197-aecf-0dfad32b54ea mounted correctly under 
/rhev/data-center/mnt/ but can't attach to DC

here is a part of vdsm.log


Thread-37506::DEBUG::2012-08-21 
10:23:31,463::task::568::TaskManager.Task::(_updateState) 
Task=`d2436317-5e3f-4bf1-8414-b3e771a04b76`::moving from state init -> state 
preparing
Thread-37506::INFO::2012-08-21 
10:23:31,464::logUtils::37::dispatcher::(wrapper) Run and protect: 
getStoragePoolInfo(spUUID='8800e8fa-bcee-11e1-9c2b-000c290cc066', options=None)
Thread-37506::DEBUG::2012-08-21 
10:23:31,464::resourceManager::175::ResourceManager.Request::(__init__) 
ResName=`Storage.8800e8fa-bcee-11e1-9c2b-000c290cc066`ReqID=`9698fc65-ad15-4c61-af01-1ce4ad627447`::Request
 was made in '/usr/share/vdsm/storage/resourceManager.py' line '485' at 
'registerResource'
Thread-37506::DEBUG::2012-08-21 
10:23:31,464::resourceManager::486::ResourceManager::(registerResource) Trying 
to register resource 'Storage.8800e8fa-bcee-11e1-9c2b-000c290cc066' for lock 
type 'shared'
Thread-37506::DEBUG::2012-08-21 
10:23:31,465::resourceManager::528::ResourceManager::(registerResource) 
Resource 'Storage.8800e8fa-bcee-11e1-9c2b-000c290cc066' is free. Now locking as 
'shared' (1 active user)
Thread-37506::DEBUG::2012-08-21 
10:23:31,465::resourceManager::212::ResourceManager.Request::(grant) 
ResName=`Storage.8800e8fa-bcee-11e1-9c2b-000c290cc066`ReqID=`9698fc65-ad15-4c61-af01-1ce4ad627447`::Granted
 request
Thread-37506::DEBUG::2012-08-21 
10:23:31,466::task::794::TaskManager.Task::(resourceAcquired) 
Task=`d2436317-5e3f-4bf1-8414-b3e771a04b76`::_resourcesAcquired: 
Storage.8800e8fa-bcee-11e1-9c2b-000c290cc066 (shared)
Thread-37506::DEBUG::2012-08-21 
10:23:31,466::task::957::TaskManager.Task::(_decref) 
Task=`d2436317-5e3f-4bf1-8414-b3e771a04b76`::ref 1 aborting False
Thread-37506::DEBUG::2012-08-21 
10:23:31,466::lvm::368::OperationMutex::(_reloadvgs) Operation 'lvm reload 
operation' got the operation mutex
Thread-37506::DEBUG::2012-08-21 
10:23:31,470::__init__::1249::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(_log) '/bin/sudo -n 
/sbin/lvm vgs --config " devices { preferred_names = [\\"^/dev/mapper/\\"] 
ignore_suspended_devices=1 write_cache_state=0 disable_after_error_count=3 
filter = [ 
\\"a%1ATA_KINGSTON_SV100S232G_50026B7221046658|1p_ISCSI_0_lun1|1p_ISCSI_0_lun2|1p_ISCSI_0_lun3%\\",
 \\"r%.*%\\" ] }  global {  locking_type=1  prioritise_write_locks=1  
wait_for_locks=1 }  backup {  retain_min = 50  retain_days = 0 } " --noheadings 
--units b --nosuffix --separator | -o 
uuid,name,attr,size,free,extent_size,extent_count,free_count,tags,vg_mda_size,vg_mda_free
 e57827fe-f368-4e96-b57c-f14d52cfccb7' (cwd None)
Thread-37506::DEBUG::2012-08-21 
10:23:31,564::__init__::1249::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(_log) SUCCESS:  = ''; 
 = 0
Thread-37506::DEBUG::2012-08-21 
10:23:31,566::lvm::397::OperationMutex::(_reloadvgs) Operation 'lvm reload 
operation' released the operation mutex
Thread-37506::DEBUG::2012-08-21 
10:23:31,567::misc::1061::SamplingMethod::(__call__) Trying to enter sampling 
method (storage.sdc.refreshStorage)
Dummy-86::DEBUG::2012-08-21 
10:23:31,773::__init__::1249::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(_log) 'dd 
if=/rhev/data-center/8800e8fa-bcee-11e1-9c2b-000c290cc066/mastersd/dom_md/inbox 
iflag=direct,fullblock count=1 bs=1024000' (cwd None)
Dummy-86::DEBUG::2012-08-21 
10:23:31,833::__init__::1249::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(_log) SUCCESS:  = '1+0 
records in\n1+0 records out\n1024000 bytes (1.0 MB) copied, 0.0375137 s, 27.3 
MB/s\n';  = 0
Thread-37502::DEBUG::2012-08-21 
10:23:33,317::__init__::1249::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(_log) '/bin/sudo -n 
/sbin/multipath' (cwd None)
Thread-37502::DEBUG::2012-08-21 
10:23:33,360::__init__::1249::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(_log) SUCCESS:  = ''; 
 = 0
Thread-37502::DEBUG::2012-08-21 
10:23:33,361::lvm::477::OperationMutex::(_invalidateAllPvs) Operation 'lvm 
invalidate operation' got the operation mutex
Thread-37502::DEBUG::2012-08-21 
10:23:33,361::lvm::479::OperationMutex::(_invalidateAllPvs) Operation 'lvm 
invalidate operation' released the operation mutex
Thread-37502::DEBUG::2012-08-21 
10:23:33,362::lvm::488::OperationMutex::(_invalidateAllVgs) Operation 'lvm 
invalidate operation' got the operation mutex
Thread-37502::DEBUG::2012-08-21 
10:23:33,362::lvm::490::OperationMutex::(_invalidateAllVgs) Operation 'lvm 
invalidate operation' released the operation mutex
Thread-37502::DEBUG::2012-08-21 
10:23:33,362::lvm::508::OperationMutex::(_invalidateAllLvs) Operation 'lvm 
invalidate operation' got the operation mutex
Thread-37502::DEBUG::2012-08-21 
10:23:33,363::lvm::510::OperationMutex::(_invalidateAllLvs) Operation 'lvm 
invalidate operation' released the operation mutex
Thread-37502::DEBUG::2012-08-21 
10:23:33,363::misc::1071::SamplingMethod::(__call_

Re: [Users] qcow2 image import.

2012-08-21 Thread Winfried de Heiden 

  
  
Hi all,

Importing raw and qcow2 disk images would be a very nice feature for
the next release. :)

Winfried

Op 21-08-12 05:18, Andres Gonzalez
  schreef:


  On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Antoni Segura Puimedon 
wrote:

  

  On Sun, 2012-08-19
at 17:42 -0300, Andres Gonzalez wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Itamar Heim 
wrote:
>         On 08/19/2012 01:22 PM, Omer Frenkel wrote:
>
>
>                

>
>                     *From: *"Andres Gonzalez" 
>                     *To: *users@ovirt.org
>                     *Sent: *Saturday, August 18,
2012 5:30:34 AM
>                     *Subject: *[Users] qcow2 image
import.
>
>
>                     Hello !!
>
>                     I'm wondering if it's possible
to import a VM disk
>                 on qcow2 format
>                     on oVirt to use it as a VM hard
disk.
>                     The idea is to import a VMWare
(vmdk) o Xen (ova)
>                 virtual hdd on oVirt.
>
>                     Regards.
>
>                     --
>                     AGD
>
>                    
___
>                     Users mailing list
>                     Users@ovirt.org
>                     http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>                 As far as i remember, there is no
way to import just a
>                 disk,
>                 only vm/template.
>                 i guess you could find a way to
create an OVF to
>                 represent a vm that
>                 attached to that disk,
>                 import it and then detach the disk
from the fake vm
>
>
>                
___
>                 Users mailing list
>                 Users@ovirt.org
>                 http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
>         but you don't need to convert the vmdk to
qcow2 necessarily -
>         take a look at virt-v2v to do this for you,
including changing
>         drivers, etc.
>
>
> As could could see virt-v2v converts VMWare
ESX/ESXi VMs, but I have
> on VMWare Server 2.x.
  

Wouldn't it be possible to use VMware converter 3 to migrate
the VMs to
ESX/ESXi type and then use virt-v2v?


  
  
  
  There's an application from Acronis (http://www.acronis.com/backup-recovery/advanced-server-virtual/#red-hat-rhev)
that seems to work (convert Citrix Xen Server and VMWAre
VMs) to RHEV, this should also work on oVirt, don't ?
  
  
   



-- 
AGD
  
  
  
  
  ___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users



  

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users