Re: [ovirt-users] fence issue adding host
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Martin Perina wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:05 PM, Bill James wrote: > >> that doesn't work either on good host or bad. >> Maybe that is just a distraction. >> >> Any idea why ovirt won't let me add the host? >> "Test failed: [Failed: Unable to obtain correct plug status or plug is >> not available, , ]" >> >> >> >> [root@ovirt6 prod ~]# /sbin/fence_ilo4 -a 10.144.254.87 -P -l >> Administrator -p *** -o status -v >> Executing: /usr/bin/ipmitool -I lanplus -H 10.144.254.87 -U Administrator >> -P [set] -p 623 -L ADMINISTRATOR chassis power status >> >> 1 Error: Unable to establish IPMI v2 / RMCP+ session >> >> >> Failed: Unable to obtain correct plug status or plug is not available >> > > Marku, any idea about above issue? > > Unfortunately no, the command looks fine. m, ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] ilo4 vs. ipmilan fencing agents
On 07/21/2014 05:29 PM, Jason Brooks wrote: If you change the mapping to use the native scripts its OK as long as it works for you addin Marec G to the thread Marec, should we always map ILO3 & ILO4 to the native scripts (fence_ilo3 , fence_ilo4) and not to ipmilan ??? yes, it is better as they already contains what is required. m, sorry, for late answer - PTO ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] ilo4 vs. ipmilan fencing agents
On 07/19/2014 10:45 PM, Eli Mesika wrote: - Original Message - From: "Jason Brooks" To: "users" Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 1:02:13 AM Subject: [ovirt-users] ilo4 vs. ipmilan fencing agents Hi all -- I'm trying to get fencing squared away in my cluster of hp dl-380 servers, which come with ilo4. I was able to get a successful status check from the command line with fence_ilo4, but not w/ the ilo4 option in ovirt. I see, though, that ilo4 in ovirt just maps to fence_ipmilan, and I was not able to get a successful status check w/ fence_ipmilan from the cli. So, I tried resetting the mapping so that ilo4 maps to ilo4. Now I can complete the power management test in ovirt, but I imagine there's some reason why ovirt isn't configured this way by default. Will fencing actually work for me with ilo4 mapped to ilo4, rather than to ipmilan? ILO3 and ILO4 are mapped implicitly to ipmilan with lanplus flag ON and power_wait=4 If you change the mapping to use the native scripts its OK as long as it works for you addin Marec G to the thread Marec, should we always map ILO3 & ILO4 to the native scripts (fence_ilo3 , fence_ilo4) and not to ipmilan ??? yes, it is better but adding arguments manually is fine also. m, ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] Power Management IBM IMM
On 05/19/2014 11:40 AM, Eli Mesika wrote: Hi, Any advise of which Power Management driver to use with IBM’s IMM2 management module? There’s only driver for the very old rsa management module. Hi Milen What wrong with the rsa PM , is it not working ? fence_imm is available (IPMI based) or you can use fence_ipmilan directly m, ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] [Users] Instructions to add a remote controlled power strip not in the native list?
On 04/14/2014 06:31 PM, David Smith wrote: Wow really? You can't take work from outside your QA group despite having confirmation of it working from a QA Professional who implemented it and is currently using all the changes in his own lab? If this is an absolute must, I'm sure I can arrange to give someone external access to one of these devices, but it won't be without *additional* significant effort on my part. Let me know what I can do to help resolve this. For upstream it is not a problem but for RHEL accepting it will mean that we will support this for X years (X > 10) for every customer. I'm developer, so I'm not the one who decides what should be included - please use the official channel, so it will be read by right people. m, ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Instructions to add a remote controlled power strip not in the native list?
On 04/08/2014 05:17 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: we still can't distinguish at feature level by hypervisor support. so adding this to engine will fail for any .el6 distro, until/if this is added to rhel 6.6, etc. [internal] Support for Raritan will not be added to rhel6.6/rhel7 until our QA will have access to this device for testing (or partner will test it for us). We do not have such criteria for upstream. m, Eli [Bug 519731] Fencing Agent for Raritan devices Inbox x bugzi...@redhat.com 5:32 AM (3 hours ago) to me https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519731 --- Comment #23 from Marek Grac --- Support for Raritan is now part of upstream release - 4.0.8 On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 5:43 AM, Itamar Heim wrote: On 02/17/2014 03:31 PM, Marek Grac wrote: On 02/17/2014 09:45 AM, Eli Mesika wrote: - Original Message - From: "Yedidyah Bar David" To: "Itamar Heim" Cc: users@ovirt.org Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2014 2:58:35 PM Subject: Re: [Users] Instructions to add a remote controlled power strip not in the native list? - Original Message - From: "Itamar Heim" To: "David Smith" , users@ovirt.org Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2014 2:57:00 AM Subject: Re: [Users] Instructions to add a remote controlled power strip not in the native list? On 02/14/2014 07:37 PM, David Smith wrote: We use Raritan / Dominion PX remote power blocks, is there a way to easily add support for these? CCing Marek on that in case that he had something to add from the fence-agents view since it may be already supported implicitly (like drac7 that is using actually ipmilan) No, Raritan are not supported yet (rhbz#519731) so david, if you can try to push the raritan support to fence-agents, the ovirt side is usually just a config change. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Instructions to add a remote controlled power strip not in the native list?
On 03/25/2014 07:37 PM, David Smith wrote: Unfortunately it looks like fencing.py is where the legacy --option was translated to --action. I believe ovirt calls fencing.py as a proxy to execute fence_raritan? The version of fence-agents I pulled from git has the backwards compatibility removed; https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/cluster-commits/2013-February/003090.html So if I added support for it in fence_raritan I'm not sure it would work (I can try) but also the fence-agents guys probably wouldn't take the submission to have it added to future code. Those legacy options where completely removed from v4.0 - there is an another branch v3.9.x which is based on new code but with all legacy options, it is possible that it will be one day ported to RHEL6 but it is not a priority right now. m, ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Instructions to add a remote controlled power strip not in the native list?
On 03/14/2014 10:39 AM, Itamar Heim wrote: On 03/13/2014 07:03 PM, David Smith wrote: hey can someone provide these mysterious instructions or at least point me towards the direction of where this magical list of supported fence-agents units is so I can try to figure it out myself? Perhaps you are looking for this: https://access.redhat.com/site/articles/28601 m, ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Instructions to add a remote controlled power strip not in the native list?
On 02/17/2014 09:45 AM, Eli Mesika wrote: - Original Message - From: "Yedidyah Bar David" To: "Itamar Heim" Cc: users@ovirt.org Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2014 2:58:35 PM Subject: Re: [Users] Instructions to add a remote controlled power strip not in the native list? - Original Message - From: "Itamar Heim" To: "David Smith" , users@ovirt.org Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2014 2:57:00 AM Subject: Re: [Users] Instructions to add a remote controlled power strip not in the native list? On 02/14/2014 07:37 PM, David Smith wrote: We use Raritan / Dominion PX remote power blocks, is there a way to easily add support for these? CCing Marek on that in case that he had something to add from the fence-agents view since it may be already supported implicitly (like drac7 that is using actually ipmilan) No, Raritan are not supported yet (rhbz#519731) m, ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
