Well, yes. That's actually the name VMware uses.
If it bring similar functionalities then that's the solution. Thanks for
sharing. looks pretty intresting.
Fernando
Em 27/06/2016 09:39, Fabrice Bacchella escreveu:
Isn't teaming[1] the futur, instead of bonding ?
[1] http://rhelblog.redhat.c
Isn't teaming[1] the futur, instead of bonding ?
[1] http://rhelblog.redhat.com/2014/06/23/team-driver/
> Le 27 juin 2016 à 14:31, Fernando Frediani a
> écrit :
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> Perhaps is the case of contacting the maintainer of Linux Bond module and see
> if there is room for
Thanks for the reply.
Perhaps is the case of contacting the maintainer of Linux Bond module
and see if there is room for this feature to be implement anytime. OVS
is great in the coming future, but Bond module is still something very
handy that simplify the things a lot.
Thanks
Fernando
Em
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Yevgeny Zaspitsky
wrote:
> Dan, Edy,
>
> Could you guys answer this?
>
> IIUC, the requirements are:
>
>- stream the traffic of few VLANs(network roles) through a single bond
>- be able to bind a VLAN to a bond slave with an option of fallback
>- have
Dan, Edy,
Could you guys answer this?
IIUC, the requirements are:
- stream the traffic of few VLANs(network roles) through a single bond
- be able to bind a VLAN to a bond slave with an option of fallback
- have redundancy
- assign different QoS to every VLAN (my addition)
I guess t
5 matches
Mail list logo
