Re: Reappearing messages with qpidc and bdb persistency store

2013-08-30 Thread Pavel Moravec
Hi Aleš, I haven't met this, but here are some hints to troubleshoot/investigate it: 1) Before each broker shutdown, run (and keep output of) commands: qpid-stat -q qpid-stat -u (to see subscriptions - you will see unacknowledged messages there) store_chk directory_with_journal_of_the_queue

Queue level message sequencing doesn't work with 1.0 client

2013-08-30 Thread Jakub Scholz
Hi, The JIRA QPID-4591 added the queue level sequencing. I played with it with the 0.24RC3 release and it seems it doesn't work properly with AMQP 1.0 producers (C++ / Qpid Messaging API). My queue is configured with following option: u'qpid.queue_msg_sequence': u'queue.sequence' The

Re: Queue level message sequencing doesn't work with 1.0 client

2013-08-30 Thread Gordon Sim
On 08/30/2013 11:30 AM, Jakub Scholz wrote: Hi, The JIRA QPID-4591 added the queue level sequencing. I played with it with the 0.24RC3 release and it seems it doesn't work properly with AMQP 1.0 producers (C++ / Qpid Messaging API). My queue is configured with following option:

Re: Queue level message sequencing doesn't work with 1.0 client

2013-08-30 Thread Jakub Scholz
Hi Gordon, I raised it as QPID-5106. Thanks for having a look at it. Thanks Regards Jakub On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/30/2013 11:30 AM, Jakub Scholz wrote: Hi, The JIRA QPID-4591 added the queue level sequencing. I played with it with the

Re: [c++] give application more direct control over reconnect replay

2013-08-30 Thread Gordon Sim
On 08/29/2013 04:11 PM, Gordon Sim wrote: On 08/29/2013 03:00 PM, Jakub Scholz wrote: Right now, it seems that the reconnect(...) method always requires the URL of the broker to reconnect to. Maybe it would be useful to also add a reconnect() method without the URL parameter, to trigger the

Re: Qpid throwed WSAENOBUFS while receiving data from a broker

2013-08-30 Thread jingheelu
Since my last post, we have done a number of tests involving some combinations of the following changes to determine which is more helpful in alleviating this issue: 1. Increasing the buffer count from 4 to 8; 2. Reducing the receiver capacity from 100 to 10; 3. Upgrading from Windows Server 2003