On 06/18/2013 05:34 PM, Rajesh Khan wrote:
I currently have the following configuration and wanted to know if there
was anything that I can do to boost the performance of my LVQ.Also there
are some questions:
The sender creates a LVQ with the following configuration
The c++ broker currently checks for delete permission when autodeleting
a queue. Where the queue is also exclusive, this is when the 'owning'
session ends. Where it is not exclusive, this is when the last consumer
cancels.
I think checking permission for the delete is wrong in both these
+1
On 06/17/2013 06:42 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
I've just opened QPID-4931[1] and a code review [2] to change the
behaviour of the --port 0 command line option to the C++ broker.
Essentially if you use this option after the change the broker will only
listen to a single address and you will
On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 20:04 +0100, Fraser Adams wrote:
On ...
So how about
a) A few more warnings like this shouted out on the user list.
b) disabling it from building as the default and requiring an explicit
option
c) updating the doco to say it's in the departure lounge and will be
On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 18:30 -0400, Ken Giusti wrote:
Folks,
There's some old QMF-related code in our repo that appears to be quite dead.
I've create a JIRA to track this work:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4940
I'm in the mood to remove lots of code from the tree ;-), so I'll
