Re: Proposed SASL changes (API and functional)

2015-03-03 Thread Ken Giusti
- Original Message - From: Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com To: users@qpid.apache.org Cc: pro...@qpid.apache.org Sent: Monday, March 2, 2015 2:30:28 PM Subject: Re: Proposed SASL changes (API and functional) On 02/24/2015 08:48 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote: In a short while when people

Re: Proposed SASL changes (API and functional)

2015-03-03 Thread Gordon Sim
On 03/03/2015 01:50 AM, Andrew Stitcher wrote: On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 18:41 +, Gordon Sim wrote: In fact the c++ broker doesn't use an AMQP 1.0 style layer for SSL at all - i.e. it does not recognise the special AMQP 1.0 TLS header sent in the clear prior to TLS handshaking as described in

Re: Proposed SASL changes (API and functional)

2015-03-03 Thread Andrew Stitcher
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 15:28 +, Gordon Sim wrote: On 03/03/2015 01:50 AM, Andrew Stitcher wrote: On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 18:41 +, Gordon Sim wrote: In fact the c++ broker doesn't use an AMQP 1.0 style layer for SSL at all - i.e. it does not recognise the special AMQP 1.0 TLS header

Proton reactor send and receive tools

2015-03-03 Thread Justin Ross
In PROTON-818, Cliff has introduced some examples using the C reactor interfaces. For simple programs, they are pretty long. - reactor-recv.c - http://goo.gl/4QkqsE - 447 lines - reactor-send.c - http://goo.gl/Zcg9Sy - 389 lines Some questions: - The examples carry connections in a

Re: 0.32 release update - Beta is available

2015-03-03 Thread Chuck Rolke
OK running broker and c++ messaging client work on windows Visual Studio 2010, x86, debug * Running with today's proton master branch * Runs C++ messaging examples - Original Message - From: Justin Ross justin.r...@gmail.com To: users@qpid.apache.org Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015