Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.4 RC1

2023-09-25 Thread zhouxzhan
+1 On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:44 PM fuyou wrote: > +1 > > Gaoyang Cai 于2023年9月24日周日 18:20写道: > > > +1(Non-binding) > > I've checked: > > > > [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package. > > [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package. > > [OK] Source

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.4 RC1

2023-09-25 Thread fuyou
+1 Gaoyang Cai 于2023年9月24日周日 18:20写道: > +1(Non-binding) > I've checked: > > [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package. > [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package. > [OK] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current > release. > [OK]

Re:[VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.4 RC1

2023-09-24 Thread Gaoyang Cai
+1(Non-binding) I've checked: [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package. [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package. [OK] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. [OK] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the

Re:[VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.4 RC1

2023-09-22 Thread jinrongtong
+1, I checked[OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.[OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.[OK] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.[OK] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.[OK]