+1,
I’v checked:
- Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
- Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
- License and Notice are correct in source package.
- All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
-
+1
[ OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for the Source package.
[ OK] License and Notice are correct in source package.
[ OK] All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
[ OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo are matching the current artifacts.
wenfeng wang
+1
ShannonDing 于2019年11月21日周四 下午9:38写道：
> +1,
> Before call for this release, I checked:
>
> [ OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
>
> [ OK] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> release.
>
> [ OK] License and Notice are correct in source
+1,
Before call for this release, I checked:
[ OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
[ OK] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[ OK] License and Notice are correct in source package.
[ OK] All files have license headers in source
Hello RocketMQ Community,
This is the vote for version 1.2.4 of Apache RocketMQ Client Go(Cgo).
The artifacts:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-client-go/1.2.4-rc1/
Git tag for the release:
https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-client-go/releases/tag/v1.2.4
Hash for
