t;
> -Alex
>
>
>
> *From: *mrchnk
> *Reply-To: *"users@royale.apache.org"
> *Date: *Friday, January 11, 2019 at 7:14 AM
>
>
> *To: *"users@royale.apache.org"
> *Subject: *Re: Linkage problem for asjs compiler
>
>
>
> Hi Alex.
>
&
From: *mrchnk
> *Reply-To: *"users@royale.apache.org"
> *Date: *Saturday, January 5, 2019 at 12:06 AM
>
>
> *To: *"users@royale.apache.org"
> *Subject: *Re: Linkage problem for asjs compiler
>
>
>
> Something changed in build 1770.
>
>
>
>
Are you still having the problem in the latest nightly?
-Alex
From: mrchnk
Reply-To: "users@royale.apache.org"
Date: Friday, January 4, 2019 at 3:06 PM
To: "users@royale.apache.org"
Subject: Re: Linkage problem for asjs compiler
I tried to reproduce that case with m
xed this in a test case I built. Let us know if
> it solves your issue.
>
>
>
> -Alex
>
>
>
> *From: *Alex Harui
> *Reply-To: *"users@royale.apache.org"
> *Date: *Thursday, December 27, 2018 at 10:52 PM
>
>
> *To: *"users@royale.apa
I pushed changes that fixed this in a test case I built. Let us know if it
solves your issue.
-Alex
From: Alex Harui
Reply-To: "users@royale.apache.org"
Date: Thursday, December 27, 2018 at 10:52 PM
To: "users@royale.apache.org"
Subject: Re: Linkage problem for asjs c
g"
Subject: Re: Linkage problem for asjs compiler
No problem. Here is both ActionScript sources and JavaScript file
https://gist.github.com/mrchnk/cb5449bbd0a7eeaeb6b0ac5a0ce13dd4<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgist.github.com%2Fmrchnk%2Fcb5449bbd0a7eeaeb
To: "users@royale.apache.org"
Subject: Re: Linkage problem for asjs compiler
I just tested latest nightly build 1735
Now I have another issue with linker:
That time some required dependencies are omitted in index.html. But that
classes are declared with dependencies on themselve
rom base classes is not a
> recommended practice).
>
>
>
> -Alex
>
>
>
> *From: *mrchnk
> *Reply-To: *"users@royale.apache.org"
> *Date: *Tuesday, December 18, 2018 at 1:26 PM
>
>
> *To: *"users@royale.apache.org"
> *Subject: *Re: Linkage problem f
> JavaScript should be able to set up these classes and constructors without
> problem.
>
>
>
> -Alex
>
>
>
> *From: *mrchnk
> *Reply-To: *"users@royale.apache.org"
> *Date: *Tuesday, December 18, 2018 at 12:24 PM
>
>
> *To: *"users
8 at 12:24 PM
To: "users@royale.apache.org"
Subject: Re: Linkage problem for asjs compiler
I found the issue for that case. The problem is in Animation constructor:
...
if (_rootTimeline == null) {
if (_rootFrame == -1) {
_rootFrame = 0;
_root
olean;
>>>
>>> public static var foo:int;;
>>>
>>> public static function initialize() {
>>>
>>>SomeClass.foo = SomeOtherClass.foo;
>>>
>>>SomeClass.initialized = true;
>>>
>>>
tic var initialized:Boolean;
>>
>> public static var foo:int;;
>>
>> public static function initialize() {
>>
>>SomeClass.foo = SomeOtherClass.foo;
>>
>>SomeClass.initialized = true;
>>
>> }
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>
}
>
> }
>
>
>
> And then before you actually read SomeClass.foo, add
>
>
>
>if (!SomeClass.initialized) SomeClass.initialize();
>
>
>
> But first, we have to see if there is a circularity being reported.
>
>
>
> HTH,
>
> -Alex
>
-Alex
>
>
>
> *From: *Alex Harui
> *Reply-To: *"users@royale.apache.org"
> *Date: *Friday, December 14, 2018 at 11:32 PM
>
>
> *To: *"users@royale.apache.org"
> *Subject: *Re: Linkage problem for asjs compiler
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
g"
Subject: Re: Linkage problem for asjs compiler
Alex, here are files you requested:
https://gist.github.com/mrchnk/c0965fdfef6caf0632acc78d1138940c<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgist.github.com%2Fmrchnk%2Fc0965fdfef6caf0632acc78d1138940c=02%7C
ked for earlier, please also post link to
> openfl.swc and openfl.min.js.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Alex
>
>
>
> *From: *mrchnk
> *Reply-To: *"users@royale.apache.org"
> *Date: *Friday, December 14, 2018 at 8:22 AM
> *To: *"users@royale.apac
ent.js in a SWC?
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> *From: *mrchnk
> *Reply-To: *"users@royale.apache.org"
> *Date: *Thursday, December 13, 2018 at 10:24 PM
> *To: *"users@royale.apache.org"
> *Subject: *Re: Linkage problem for asjs compiler
>
> Same p
a SWC?
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> From: mrchnk
> Reply-To: "users@royale.apache.org"
> Date: Thursday, December 13, 2018 at 10:24 PM
> To: "users@royale.apache.org"
> Subject: Re: Linkage problem for asjs compiler
>
> Same problem with the ni
: mrchnk mailto:mrc...@gmail.com>>
Reply-To: "users@royale.apache.org<mailto:users@royale.apache.org>"
mailto:users@royale.apache.org>>
Date: Thursday, December 13, 2018 at 10:34 AM
To: "users@royale.apache.org<mailto:users@royale.apache.org>"
mailto:users@r
sers@royale.apache.org"
> *Date: *Thursday, December 13, 2018 at 10:34 AM
> *To: *"users@royale.apache.org"
> *Subject: *Linkage problem for asjs compiler
>
>
>
> Greetings!
>
>
>
> I tried to compile a large project using npm distribution of Apache Royale
/apache-royale-0.9.6-bin-js.tar.gz
No guarantees that will fix your issue, but at least we can eliminate some
possibilities.
HTH,
-Alex
From: mrchnk
Reply-To: "users@royale.apache.org"
Date: Thursday, December 13, 2018 at 10:34 AM
To: "users@royale.apache.org"
Subject: Link
21 matches
Mail list logo
