Re: [SOGo] ANN: SOGo v1.3.8

2011-07-18 Thread Ladislav Pašek
Hello Francis, now I;m not able to run multi-domain config at all. When I try to access SOGo web page it will crash. Jul 17 20:45:51 sogod [3865]: version 1.3.8 (build r...@vizzini.inverse.ca 201107141607) -- starting Jul 17 20:45:51 sogod [3865]: vmem size check enabled: shutting down app

Re: [SOGo] ANN: SOGo v1.3.8

2011-07-18 Thread Sebastian Reitenbach
On Sunday, July 17, 2011 19:57 CEST, Clay Wright cwri...@tsswcb.state.tx.us wrote: On 07/17/2011 07:47 AM, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: I just upgraded to sope/sogo 1.3.8 on OpenBSD/i386 (gnustep-make-2.6.1, gnustep-base-1.22.1). Afterwards I now had to recognize that in the mail

Re: [SOGo] ANN: SOGo v1.3.8

2011-07-18 Thread Ladislav Pašek
After changing domains as you've recommended it is working. Thanks for help Ladislav Dne 15.7.2011 20:53, Francis Lachapelle napsal(a): Hi Ladislav On 2011-07-15, at 10:59 AM, Ladislav Pašek wrote: my multi-domain config stop working after update. I have to switch to single domain config

Re: [SOGo] ANN: SOGo v1.3.8

2011-07-18 Thread J. Echter
Hi, wheres the Ubuntu Lucid repo gone? cheers juergen Am 15.07.2011 14:48, schrieb Francis Lachapelle: The Inverse Team is pleased to announce the immediate availability of SOGo 1.3.8. This is a minor release of SOGo which focuses on small new features and improved stability over previous

Re: [SOGo] migrating old calendar data to new SOGo server, but with new usernames in ldap

2011-07-18 Thread J. Echter
Am 06.07.2011 13:33, schrieb J. Echter: Hi, i'd like to have a new SOGo server, within this step i'd like to rework my LDAP directory structure... Is it, somehow, possible to copy the old data to the new server into different named accounts? If so, it would be great to have a short

[SOGo] Parent process consumes 100% cpu

2011-07-18 Thread Raffael Bachmann
Hi, In the last weeks we are facing a problem with our SOGo server. From time to time (sometimes twice a day) the parent process consumes full cpu. We tried several things and are out of ideas right now. It looks like the child processes are somehow occupied in a request but do not need any

Re: [SOGo] Parent process consumes 100% cpu

2011-07-18 Thread Ludovic Marcotte
On 18/07/11 07:13, Raffael Bachmann wrote: From time to time (sometimes twice a day) the parent process consumes full cpu. That happens when all sogod workers are doing some work - the parent process will spin very quickly trying to find an available worker. Increase the number of sogod

Re: [SOGo] ANN: SOGo v1.3.8

2011-07-18 Thread Francis Lachapelle
Hi Stuart On 2011-07-17, at 12:43 PM, Stuart Sheldon wrote: I have not attempted (nor currently plan) to implement the two new global domain settings. Should I adjust our configuration to accommodate any future conflicts, such as modifying our domain array keys to not match their

Re: [SOGo] ANN: SOGo v1.3.8

2011-07-18 Thread Dennis Petschull
Hi Francis, thanks for the infos. So, I'm using a mail attribute as the UIDFieldName in a multi-domain setup. Hence, I've changed the domain keys and ran into some problems (see my last mails). Is there anything I can do about my problems? Cheers, Dennis Am 18.07.2011 14:38, schrieb Francis

Re: [SOGo] Parent process consumes 100% cpu

2011-07-18 Thread Raffael Bachmann
Thanks for the fast answer. How many workers would you suggest? I tried it once with 6 and 10 but because of the memory consumption (swapping) the server became even less responsive. Right now we are using 4 workers. Couldn't it be that this aggressive waiting strategy could even prevent

Re: [SOGo] ANN: SOGo v1.3.8

2011-07-18 Thread Francis Lachapelle
Hi Dennis On 2011-07-16, at 5:13 PM, Dennis Petschull wrote: can you also confirm, that calendar and addressbook sharing is not working anymore now? I'll release 1.3.8a with a fix later today. Thanks, Francis -- flachape...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.755.3640 :: http://www.inverse.ca Inverse ::

Re: [SOGo] ANN: SOGo v1.3.8

2011-07-18 Thread Dennis Petschull
Thanks alot! Dennis Am 18.07.2011 15:52, schrieb Francis Lachapelle: Hi Dennis On 2011-07-16, at 5:13 PM, Dennis Petschull wrote: can you also confirm, that calendar and addressbook sharing is not working anymore now? I'll release 1.3.8a with a fix later today. Thanks, Francis

Re: [SOGo] ANN: SOGo v1.3.8

2011-07-18 Thread Francis Lachapelle
On 2011-07-18, at 5:57 AM, J. Echter wrote: wheres the Ubuntu Lucid repo gone? Use 'main' : https://inverse.ca/downloads/SOGo/Ubuntu/conf/distributions -- flachape...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.755.3640 :: http://www.inverse.ca Inverse :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://sogo.nu) and PacketFence

Re: [SOGo] Thunderbird 5.*

2011-07-18 Thread Donny Brooks
On 7/6/2011 12:56 PM, eric.nemozgaill...@free.fr wrote: Hi, I would like to be informed if the development of Thunderbird 5.*-compatible Sogo is scheduled. I really like the extension and functionalities, but I also would like to evolve to Thunderbird 5. Thanks for your answers. Eric I too

Re: [SOGo] Parent process consumes 100% cpu

2011-07-18 Thread Raffael Bachmann
On 07/18/2011 03:49 PM, André Schild wrote: Am 18.07.2011 15:38, schrieb Raffael Bachmann: Thanks for the fast answer. How many workers would you suggest? I think this depends on the number of clients which are actively accessing your sogo server ;) There are about 30 users with

Re: [SOGo] ANN: SOGo v1.3.8

2011-07-18 Thread Stuart Sheldon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Thanks Francis, Stu On 07/18/2011 05:38 AM, Francis Lachapelle wrote: Hi Stuart On 2011-07-17, at 12:43 PM, Stuart Sheldon wrote: I have not attempted (nor currently plan) to implement the two new global domain settings. Should I

Re: [SOGo] Parent process consumes 100% cpu

2011-07-18 Thread Julian Robbins
On 18/07/11 15:00, Raffael Bachmann wrote: On 07/18/2011 03:49 PM, André Schild wrote: Am 18.07.2011 15:38, schrieb Raffael Bachmann: Thanks for the fast answer. How many workers would you suggest? I think this depends on the number of clients which are actively accessing your sogo

Re: [SOGo] ANN: SOGo v1.3.8

2011-07-18 Thread Sebastian Reitenbach
On Monday, July 18, 2011 09:35 CEST, Sebastian Reitenbach sebas...@l00-bugdead-prods.de wrote: On Sunday, July 17, 2011 19:57 CEST, Clay Wright cwri...@tsswcb.state.tx.us wrote: On 07/17/2011 07:47 AM, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: I just upgraded to sope/sogo 1.3.8 on

[SOGo] LDAP issue

2011-07-18 Thread Bo Lynch
I'm new to SoGo and to using ldap as well so any help would be greatly appreciated. I have a working SoGo server and allowing password changes with it as well. Running Centos 5.6 with the updated versions of everything. Dovecot,ldap,mysql,etc. The problem Im having is that when a user changes

Re: [SOGo] Thunderbird 5.*

2011-07-18 Thread Thomas Kregelin
On 07/18/2011 03:59 PM, Donny Brooks wrote: On 7/6/2011 12:56 PM, eric.nemozgaill...@free.fr wrote: Hi, I would like to be informed if the development of Thunderbird 5.*-compatible Sogo is scheduled. I really like the extension and functionalities, but I also would like to evolve to

Re: [SOGo] SOGo and funambol connector

2011-07-18 Thread Simon Veit
Hello Christian, I now re-setup funambol, am using json_simple-1.1.jar and fixed a bug in /etc/apache2/conf.d/SOGo.conf (wrong port). Still no login-attempts in the logs. Should I use the same db for funambol and sogo? I seem to be blind. Simon Am 18.07.2011 00:29, schrieb Christian

[SOGo] event invitation recipient limit

2011-07-18 Thread Stephen Ingram
Is there a limit to the number of recipients in an invitation to an event? I'm suspecting that is the reason for this error: Warning received code: 500 error: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1? html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; bodyh3An error occurred during object publishing/h3pfatal

[SOGo] BTS activities for Monday, July 18 2011

2011-07-18 Thread SOGo reporter
Title: BTS activities for Monday, July 18 2011 BTS Activities Home page: http://www.sogo.nu/bugs Project: SOGo For the period covering: Monday, July 18 2011 idlast updatestatus (resolution)categorysummary 1382