On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 01:33:05PM +0100 you wrote:
> We've been running v3 since its initial release and I
> have never experienced any different behaviour. The appointments
> are correctly flagged as confidential (if you examine the XML sent
> to the client) but I believe this should be
uot; <users@sogo.nu>
To: users@sogo.nu
Subject: Re: [SOGo] confidential appointments
hello,
caldav: at least v3.1.3.20160623-1 honors the confidential/private flag but i'm unsure if this is done on the server side - tested this using icedove/ligthning.
carddav: does not apply
sorry fo
;\\\"sg gs\\\"\" (s...@mail.com)" <users@sogo.nu>
To: users@sogo.nu
Subject: Re: [SOGo] confidential appointments
hello,
i guess caldav/carddav/.. suffer from the same issue and i was told this is a weakness, deigned into the rfc. the implementaion is correct wit
?
thanks for your attention
regards, g.
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 at 2:55 PM
From: "\"Ralf Cirksena\" (c...@holmco.de)" <users@sogo.nu>
To: "Ian McMichael" <users@sogo.nu>
Subject: Re: [SOGo] confidential appointments
On Thu,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 01:33:05PM +0100 you wrote:
> It is here. We've been running v3 since its initial release and I
> have never experienced any different behaviour.
Bad.
> The appointments are correctly flagged as confidential (if you
> examine the XML sent to the client) but I believe
On 23/06/16 07:53, Ralf Cirksena (c...@holmco.de) wrote:
Is that still an issue in SOGo 3.1.2?
It is here. We've been running v3 since its initial release and I have
never experienced any different behaviour. The appointments are
correctly flagged as confidential (if you examine the XML
yes, it's a schow stopper - agreed
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 at 8:40 AM
From: "\"Ralf Cirksena\" (c...@holmco.de)" <users@sogo.nu>
To: "Ian McMichael" <users@sogo.nu>
Subject: Re: [SOGo] confidential appointments
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:56:40PM
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:56:40PM +0100 you wrote:
> Alternatively, if any of your users are connected via ActiveSync
> there is a long-standing bug which reveals confidential information
> regardless of the settings:
>
> https://sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=3118
Uh oh...
We are syncing MS
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:56:40PM +0100 you wrote:
> Alternatively, if any of your users are connected via ActiveSync
> there is a long-standing bug which reveals confidential information
> regardless of the settings:
>
> https://sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=3118
Is that still an issue in SOGo
On 22/06/16 12:51, Christian Mack (christian.m...@uni-konstanz.de) wrote:
You did give them privileges to see those in your calendar.
Or the admin did so, and you didn't change that.
Alternatively, if any of your users are connected via ActiveSync there
is a long-standing bug which reveals
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 01:51:41PM +0200 you wrote:
> You did give them privileges to see those in your calendar.
> Or the admin did so, and you didn't change that.
The others, who should not see the details of confidential entries,
have permission to see time/date.
Maybe I found out what has
Hello
Am 22.06.2016 um 12:48 schrieb Ralf Cirksena (c...@holmco.de):
>
> if I enter an appointment as "confidential" through the web interface
> it is visable to others in CalDAV synchronized Thunderbird calendar.
>
> SOGo 3.1.2
>
> What's wrong here?
>
You did give them privileges to see
12 matches
Mail list logo
