[SOGo] BTS activities for Monday, December 09 2019

[SOGo reporter]

Title: BTS activities for Monday, December 09 2019





  
BTS Activities

  Home page: https://sogo.nu/bugs
  Project: SOGo
  For the period covering: Monday, December 09 2019

  
  
idlast updatestatus (resolution)categorysummary
	
	
	  
	
4903
	2019-12-09 07:56:58
	updated (open)
	Backend Calendar
	All-Day events created in Thunderbird are displayed as 24h event
	
	  
	
4894
	2019-12-09 12:29:30
	updated (open)
	Web Calendar
	Sogo shows event created in external app moved by one hour
	
	  
	
4904
	2019-12-09 15:12:28
	updated (open)
	Web Mail
	When an email is forwarded or answered, attachments are lost
	
	  
	
4902
	2019-12-09 11:42:04
	resolved (fixed)
	Web Mail
	Cannot forward/reply in editor new window mode
	
	  
	
  
  


-- users@sogo.nuhttps://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Problems with attendee status of events

[Christian Mack]

Hello

There are 2 attachments on the reply mail from gmail.
the first is of type
Content-Type: text/calendar; charset="UTF-8"; method=REPLY
the second is of type
Content-Type: application/ics; name="invite.ics"

They both contain the same reply, just in different packaging.
Because of that you see it doubled within the same email.


Kind regards,
Christian Mack

Am 05.12.19 um 13:55 schrieb "Lorenz Pressler" (lor...@pressler.pro):
> 
> well I did some work an the server, updating dovecot and postfix and now it 
> seems to work (not seeing how these things can be related..)
> however the duplicated display of the messages is still there.
> the md-card-content is displayed two times with the only difference in the 
> sg-imip-path ("1/3/Untitled-3.ics" and ""2/Einladung.ics")
> 
> I uploaded the raw messages here:
> sogo invite to gmail user (no problem here ever, just for completeness): 
> https://pastebin.com/XKXu86tG
> acceptance reply from gmail to sogo (this works now, but is displayed twice): 
> https://pastebin.com/U8WA68fi
> snip from the SOGo UI of the mailview where this is displayed twice: 
> https://pastebin.com/6EtVFanW
> the md-card-content is displayed two times with the only difference in the 
> sg-imip-path ("1/3/Untitled-3.ics" and ""2/Einladung.ics")
> 
> I have sogo4-activesync-4.0.8_1 installed on "FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE-p6 GENERIC 
>  amd64"
> I will have a check if the WebServerResources of the repo match my 
> installation; maybe something went wrong with the last update..
> 
> best, Lorenz
> 
> 
> On Thursday, December 05, 2019 11:56 CET, "Christian Mack" 
> (christian.m...@uni-konstanz.de)  wrote:
>  Hello
> 
> Am 28.11.19 um 12:19 schrieb "Lorenz Pressler" (lor...@pressler.pro):
>>
>> Hello,
>> I am not quite sure how this attendence status of participants of events 
>> work. The mails are sent to the participants I added but when I confirm the 
>> attendence I get various results. The calendar from which I create and send 
>> this invitation is a normal calender of the user (not shared or something 
>> like that)
>>
>> case 1:
>> screenshot of the reply when the accepting user sends: 
>> https://imgur.com/a/sR5TLWW
>> as you can see, the answer is "You received a reply to a scheduling event 
>> but the sender of the reply is not a participant." even though the mail 
>> adresses match
>> and the reply is shown two times..
>>
>> case 2:
>> this is when I accept via an email adress through thunderbird
>> the confirmation mail say:  accepted your event 
>> invitation.
>> and it is only displayed once, but there is no "update status" button and 
>> the event in the calendar still shows the participant as pending.
>>
>> I'm a bit at a loss here how to troubleshoot this since I am not familiar 
>> with the subject so any input is appreciated.
>> best Lorenz
>>
> 
> Screenshot of emails is not that helpful by itself.
> Can you provide the raw source of that event?
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> Christian Mack
> 



-- 
Christian Mack
Universität Konstanz
Kommunikations-, Informations-, Medienzentrum (KIM)
Abteilung Basisdienste
78457 Konstanz
+49 7531 88-4416



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [SOGo] Issues with Apostrophe (Single Quote)

[Christian Mack]

Hi Andrew

Sorry, but all "Received" Headers are added by SMTP server en route of
the email, not SOGo.
That specific Received header is added by the first postfix on mercury.

As I said, most SMTP Servers do not support those characters.
Standards conform or not, it is a gamble to use such an address.


Kind regards,
Christian Mack

Am 27.11.19 um 13:42 schrieb Andrew Mogg (and...@logicomm.co.uk):
> Hi Anselm
> SOGo version is 4.1.1
> It is running onNethServer 7.7.1908
> 
> The original email headers (with quote marks now included):
> Return-Receipt-To: "Andy Hope" 
> From: "Andy Hope" 
> To: <"Danny.O'Brien"@#>
> References: 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> In-Reply-To: 
> 
> Subject: RE: water meter transducer
> Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 09:49:06 -
> Message-ID:
> 
> 
> The return Bounce message fails on the user not known, Notice the single 
> quote has been removed in the header on the For header, but not the To. Sogo 
> has stripped the ‘ from the email address. I cannot ask a customer to change 
> their email address due to our systems.
> 
> Return-Path: 
> Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> (Authenticated sender: andy.hope@)
> by mercury.#(Postfix) with ESMTPA id A26BE10093573
> for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 09:49:06 + 
> (GMT)
> Return-Receipt-To: "Andy Hope" 
> From: "Andy Hope" 
> To: 
> References: 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> In-Reply-To: 
> 
> 
> From: users-requ...@sogo.nu  On Behalf Of Anselm 
> Martin Hoffmeister
> Sent: 26 November 2019 17:10
> To: users@sogo.nu
> Subject: Re: [SOGo] Issues with Apostrophe (Single Quote)
> 
> 
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> I just tested writing a mail from SOGo webmail (4.1.0 in this case) to a fake 
> version of my private account elsewhere, having inserted an apostrophe '. My 
> private server rightfully refuses the (invalid) destination address - it 
> seems SOGo does everything correctly here and hands through the apostrophe 
> exactly as I would expect.
> 
> Trying to replicate the problem, doing the same with both the forward and 
> backward tick ´` (single quotation marks or accent over blank, or whatever 
> you call them), the same happens, SOGo hands through those mails and the 
> destination server then refuses - the forward tick for "invalid postbox", the 
> backtick as "restricted characters in address", and the non-delivery mail 
> quotes the refused target address including the superfluous characters.
> 
> So it seems (my) SOGo 4.1.0 works correctly. But there may be other parties 
> involved: Usually SOGo hands off the mail to a local running exim (or 
> postfix), which then forwards the mail as applicable. There may be a 
> different mail path between roundcube and SOGo, depending on your local 
> configuration.
> 
> Can you find some relevant lines in the mail server logs? In exim case and on 
> Debian(ish) Linuxes, /var/log/exim4/mainlog would be the place to investigate.
> 
> Also having details on the software version involved and perhaps the relevant 
> parts of the SOGO config may be helpful.
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Anselm
> Am 26.11.2019 um 13:37 schrieb Andrew Mogg 
> (and...@logicomm.co.uk):
> 
> Hi
> We are having issues with a particular email address which has a ‘ in its 
> email address. Such as Dano’rou...@gmail.com
> When the email is sent from SOGo, it removes the ‘ from the email address, so 
> the email is actually sent to 
> danorou...@gmail.com and therefore fails (ie 
> bounces). Interestingly, when I access the server via Roundcube and send, 
> this does not happen, so its SOGo
> Has anyone had any experience of this?
> 
> This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely by 
> Exascale.
> For more information please visit https://www.exascale.co.uk
> 
> 
> --
> users@sogo.nu
> https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
> --
> users@sogo.nu
> https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
> 


-- 
Christian Mack
Universität Konstanz
Kommunikations-, Informations-, Medienzentrum (KIM)
Abteilung Basisdienste
78457 Konstanz
+49 7531 88-4416



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

SV: [SOGo] Debian Buster?

["Christian M. Jensen"]

Hi.

Yes I think that’s another topic. But if it's only failing on Debian Buster 
then it must be a bug, I and my users use Outlook it's been awhile since I used 
Thunderbird, so can't really give any insight on this.

If I remember correctly Thunderbird / Lightning integration has been discussed 
a few times in other threads, actually a quick search in the mailing list shows 
this as well, maybe one of those can give you some answers?

Regards / Hilsen
Christian M. Jensen

-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

SV: [SOGo] Debian Buster?

["Christian M. Jensen"]

I read the mail as if you were asking, not telling! My bad sorry for the noise

Regards / Hilsen
Christian M. Jensen

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Christian M. Jensen  
Sendt: 9. december 2019 13:06
Til: users@sogo.nu
Emne: SV: [SOGo] Debian Buster?

Hi.

Yes I think that’s another topic. But if it's only failing on Debian Buster 
then it must be a bug, I and my users use Outlook it's been awhile since I used 
Thunderbird, so can't really give any insight on this.

If I remember correctly Thunderbird / Lightning integration has been discussed 
a few times in other threads, actually a quick search in the mailing list shows 
this as well, maybe one of those can give you some answers?

Regards / Hilsen
Christian M. Jensen

-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Calendars have changed behaviour with all day events

[John Stirling]

  
  
Hi Christian,
Thank you for replying

On 05/12/2019 08:39, Christian Mack
  (christian.m...@uni-konstanz.de) wrote:


  Hello

Am 28.11.19 um 18:56 schrieb John Stirling (j...@johnstirling.co.uk):

  
Hi guys,

I could really use some advice please.

I'm using sogo 4.1.1 (@shiva2.inverse 201911280300) on Ubuntu 18.04.4 
with a mixed environment of Mozilla Thunderbird versions from 68 or so
through to 71, and some phones, apple and android. We aren't a big site,
12 users, with maybe 8 phones connected.

Today following an update to the server (Ubuntu standard update), and an
increase to WOWorkersCount and PREFORK all day events have started
behaving oddly (I don't thing it can be the config change, but since
it's a change I'm mentioning it

The behaviour is that instead of showing at the top of the calendar in
Thunderbird, they now get treated as 24 hour events. This is a
significant issue for us as there are a lot of shared diaries, and we
use all day events quite a bit.  The web version of SOGo works fine.

It's odd as it seems to be applying to all versions of Thunderbird, but
there have been no updates to Thunderbird, so it appears to be how SOGo
is treating all day requests as standard from Thunderbird.  When these
events are opened in SOGo web interface they do not register as all day
events.

Thanks

John


  
  
Do you use ActiveSync?

Which timezones have you set on Thunderbird clients and sogo.conf and
user settings?

Please give an example in raw form.

BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Mozilla.org/NONSGML Mozilla Calendar V1.1//EN
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VEVENT
CREATED:20191203T173909Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20191206T144043Z
DTSTAMP:20191206T132229Z
UID:97d0e002-4dc9-4a27-be06-4ef3f94b2b20
SUMMARY:test
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20191207
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20191208
CLASS:PUBLIC
TRANSP:TRANSPARENT
SEQUENCE:3
X-MOZ-GENERATION:4
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR

  
One event created from SOGo Webfrontend which is not displayed as all
day event in Thunderbird.

If the event is created within the SOGo Webfrontend it is displayed
correctly within thunderbird and SOGo.  If the event is then edited
within Thunderbird or a new event is created within Thunderbird then
the event no long displays correctly in either SOGo or Thunderbird. 


  
And one event created in Thunderbird, which is not displayed in SOGo
webfrontend as all day.


BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Mozilla.org/NONSGML Mozilla Calendar V1.1//EN
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
LAST-MODIFIED:20191023T183904Z
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZNAME:BST
TZOFFSETFROM:+
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
DTSTART:19700329T01
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZNAME:GMT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+
DTSTART:19701025T02
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
CREATED:20191203T173909Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20191206T132229Z
DTSTAMP:20191206T132229Z
UID:97d0e002-4dc9-4a27-be06-4ef3f94b2b20
SUMMARY:test
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20191207T00
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20191208T00
CLASS:PUBLIC
TRANSP:TRANSPARENT
SEQUENCE:3
X-MOZ-GENERATION:4
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR

  


This is an iRedmail installation of SOGo, updated through Ubuntu
  apt upgrade.  We do not have any outlook clients currently.  We
  use android with webdav and imap, and have a few iPhones which
  connect using whatever dark arts apple use - so I don't think so,
  but I don't actually know.
Timezone in Thunderbird is Europe/London
SOGoTimeZone in sogo.conf is "Europe/London"
Many thanks
John Stirling


  

Kind regards,
Christian Mack



  

-- users@sogo.nuhttps://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Debian Buster?

[Florian Unger]

I made a test machine with Debian Buster and Sogo 4.0.8-nightly a few weeks ago.
Sogo itself was working well on Buster.
But Sogo 4.0.8-nightly was not working so well with Thunderbird + Lightning, but that's 
another topic...


On 02.12.2019 20:49, Robert A Wooldridge (bob.wooldri...@edm-inc.com) wrote:

Just wondering if the sogo debian package will work on Debian Buster?



--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists