Re: [SOGo] Thunderbird calendar 'momentarily not available'

[Clay Wright]

On 04/18/2016 08:00 AM, Chris Hastie (li...@oak-wood.co.uk) wrote:
> On 17/04/2016 12:36, Christian Mack (christian.m...@uni-konstanz.de)
> wrote:
>
>> When Lightnig shows that yellow triangle, it has disabled this calendar
>> in most cases.
>
> Hi
>
> Not in this case. The calendar seems to function, and is listed as
> switched on. What's more, the setting doesn't seem to persist. On
> restarting TB the triangle is initially not there, but reappears as
> soon as a sync is attempted.
>
> Deactivating and reactivating the calendar does not solve the issue.
> Nor does unsubscribing and resubscribing. As soon as a sync is
> attempted, the triangle reappears.
>
>

Occasionally I've seen this on a client where a solution was to close
Thunderbird and manually delete one or more of the .sqlite files in
[Thunderbird profile]\calendar-data and let them be recreated on the
next Thunderbird startup.

-- 
Clay
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] 3.0.3, when?

[Ludovic Marcotte]

The target is more before the end of *this month*.

On 2016-04-18 12:16, Fernando Salas [Novanet] (fsalas@novanet.network) 
wrote:

Dear Friends,

I think 1st june is to much time, specially for the bug 3571 that is a real
issue, don't forget there are to many users behind Apple devices and right
now with the 3.0.2 version it is impossible to use the mail.  In the other
hand I think that the 3.0.3 version is by far the one with the most bugs
fixed (40) so please release it as soon as possible.

Regards,

Fernando Salas



-Mensaje original-
De: users-requ...@sogo.nu [mailto:users-requ...@sogo.nu] En nombre de Keith
Williams
Enviado el: lunes, 18 de abril de 2016 8:37
Para: users@sogo.nu
Asunto: Re: [SOGo] 3.0.3, when?

Hi Emilio,

I believe it will be the 1st of June.

I also could not wait as I had customers on 3.0.2 that had the issue, so I
proceeded to build custom RPMs for CentOS 7 so I could update without having
to wait.

So far no issues noted.. (4 days-60 clients with AS devices)

Regards,


On 2016/04/18 2:57 PM, Emilio Fonseca (emilio.fons...@mav.com.br) wrote:

Hi everyone,

I am very anxious to use 3.0.3 version of SOGo.
Since they released the fix of the bug 3571, I am really excited to
use this new version that includes a lot of others fixes too.

As I know that the nightly builds should not be considered production
ready, can someone tell me when 3.0.3 will be released? Is that soon?

Best Regards.


--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists




--
Ludovic Marcotte
lmarco...@inverse.ca  ::  +1.514.755.3630  ::  http://inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(http://packetfence.org)

--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

RE: [SOGo] 3.0.3, when?

[Fernando Salas [Novanet]]

Dear Friends,

I think 1st june is to much time, specially for the bug 3571 that is a real
issue, don't forget there are to many users behind Apple devices and right
now with the 3.0.2 version it is impossible to use the mail.  In the other
hand I think that the 3.0.3 version is by far the one with the most bugs
fixed (40) so please release it as soon as possible.

Regards,

Fernando Salas



-Mensaje original-
De: users-requ...@sogo.nu [mailto:users-requ...@sogo.nu] En nombre de Keith
Williams
Enviado el: lunes, 18 de abril de 2016 8:37
Para: users@sogo.nu
Asunto: Re: [SOGo] 3.0.3, when?

Hi Emilio,

I believe it will be the 1st of June.

I also could not wait as I had customers on 3.0.2 that had the issue, so I
proceeded to build custom RPMs for CentOS 7 so I could update without having
to wait.

So far no issues noted.. (4 days-60 clients with AS devices)

Regards,


On 2016/04/18 2:57 PM, Emilio Fonseca (emilio.fons...@mav.com.br) wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am very anxious to use 3.0.3 version of SOGo.
> Since they released the fix of the bug 3571, I am really excited to 
> use this new version that includes a lot of others fixes too.
>
> As I know that the nightly builds should not be considered production 
> ready, can someone tell me when 3.0.3 will be released? Is that soon?
>
> Best Regards.
>
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Thunderbird calendar 'momentarily not available'

[Chris Hastie]

On 17/04/2016 12:36, Christian Mack (christian.m...@uni-konstanz.de) wrote:


When Lightnig shows that yellow triangle, it has disabled this calendar
in most cases.


Hi

Not in this case. The calendar seems to function, and is listed as 
switched on. What's more, the setting doesn't seem to persist. On 
restarting TB the triangle is initially not there, but reappears as soon 
as a sync is attempted.


Deactivating and reactivating the calendar does not solve the issue. Nor 
does unsubscribing and resubscribing. As soon as a sync is attempted, 
the triangle reappears.



--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] 3.0.3, when?

[Keith Williams]

Hi Emilio,

I believe it will be the 1st of June.

I also could not wait as I had customers on 3.0.2 that had the issue, so 
I proceeded to build custom RPMs for CentOS 7 so I could update without 
having to wait.


So far no issues noted.. (4 days-60 clients with AS devices)

Regards,


On 2016/04/18 2:57 PM, Emilio Fonseca (emilio.fons...@mav.com.br) wrote:

Hi everyone,

I am very anxious to use 3.0.3 version of SOGo.
Since they released the fix of the bug 3571, I am really excited to use
this new version that includes a lot of others fixes too.

As I know that the nightly builds should not be considered production
ready, can someone tell me when 3.0.3 will be released? Is that soon?

Best Regards.


--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

[SOGo] 3.0.3, when?

[Emilio Fonseca]

Hi everyone,

I am very anxious to use 3.0.3 version of SOGo.
Since they released the fix of the bug 3571, I am really excited to use 
this new version that includes a lot of others fixes too.


As I know that the nightly builds should not be considered production 
ready, can someone tell me when 3.0.3 will be released? Is that soon?


Best Regards.

--

Emílio Fonseca
Development Analyst
Mav Tecnologia - (31) 3211-

--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] SOGo Web interface slow since upgrade to 3.0.2

[Christian Mack]

Hello

Is your memcached running?

Kind regards,
Christian Mack

Am 18.04.2016 um 13:40 schrieb Adrian Figueroa (adr...@figueroa.cc):
> Is there anything wrong with my configuration? I did not change it
> between updates anyway, so I do not think that it is the cause of the
> problem. I came from SOGo 3.0 and there were no issues.
> 
> Am 14.04.2016 um 21:52 schrieb Adrian Figueroa (adr...@figueroa.cc):
>> I installed SOGo as part of the iRedMail package. I think that a sieve
>> server is running but I do not know any details. The logs of both
>> apache and SOGo do not show any errors by the way.
>>
>> Here is my sogo.conf:
>> https://s.coda.pw/?2c92588d72036759#1Gpf7sI7DS6bZtBptctyaZmGLmp3RpDG8JGao7gfkJM=
>>
>>
>> Adrian
>>
>> Am 14.04.2016 um 20:42 schrieb "Qmail" (qm...@top-consulting.net):
>>> Can you paste your sogo.conf ?
>>>
>>> Did you setup a sieve server and if so, is it really working ?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 02:29 PM, Adrian Figueroa  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am having issues with the SOGo web interface. It is very slow
>>> to load
>>> and react anything.
>>>
>>> It was running well before upgrading to 3.0.2. I have a worker
>>> count of
>>> 40 and all other requests (Thunderbird, Exchange on phones etc.) run
>>> fast and fine.
>>>
>>> What could be the problem?
>>>


-- 
Christian Mack
Universität Konstanz
Kommunikations-, Informations-, Medienzentrum (KIM)
Abteilung Basisdienste
78457 Konstanz
+49 7531 88-4416



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [SOGo] Resource does not send emails

[Sten Anderson]

Anyone?

On 15.04.2016 15:54, Sten Anderson (s...@mooncascade.com) wrote:
I have created a Calendar resource which works fine in the sense that 
it accepts meeting requests but it does not send an e-mail to the 
event creator. For example when the resource is booked, it would be 
very good to get an e-mail notification about that.


I have SOGoAppointmentSendEMailNotifications = Yes and e-mail address 
for the resource is set.




--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Syncing Outlook Calendar without Samba 4?

[Ralf Cirksena]

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 02:22:24PM +0200 you wrote:

> Hello
> 
> Am 12.04.2016 um 08:17 schrieb Ralf Cirksena (c...@holmco.de):
> > Hello,
> > 
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 08:28:52PM + you wrote:
> > 
> >> Hi there,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 12:33 PM Ralf Cirksena  wrote:
> >>
>  Outlook 2013 does support ActiveSync, and so does Outlook 2016. This
>  chart describes it pretty well:
> 
>  http://sogo.nu/about.html
> >>>
> >>> As we are using Outlook 2013 it should work?
> >>> The circle in that graphical overview covers both stripes: ActiveSync
> >>> and OpenChange. Does that mean both are required or does that mean one
> >>> of them (ActiveSync OR OpenChange) will do it?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Both will do it but differently Outlook 2013 can be an ActiveSync client
> >> and an Outlook Anywhere client which is a full featured one for
> >> collaboration suite, at least, theoretically. So both will do it.
> >>
> >>
>  Samba 3 does not have the Active Directory features required.
> >>>
> >>> It's required for OpenChange only, right?
> >>>
> >>
> >> OpenChange requires Samba >= 4.1.18. 4.4 version works with patches
> >> provided to this mailing list some days ago. Use SOGo packages is a secure
> >> way to have it ready.
> > 
> > O.k., conclusion is:
> > 
> > If I plan to use Outlook 2013, Android, iOS with calendar sync, group
> > calendars, resource calendars, ActiveSync will be enough. No need for
> > OpenChange (or Samba >= 4,1,18),
> > 
> > Is that right?
> > 
> 
> Yes, that is right.
> 
> 
> > Sorry, I am new to these things like ActiveSync and Outlook/Exchange.
> > 
> 
> No problem, we all started at some point.
> 
> 
> > To work with SOGo I need:
> > * SOGo ;-)
> > * LDAP for authentication (just for authentication?)
> 
> You do not need LDAP, you can also use a Database instead, but LDAP has
> additional global group support and Resources.
> Resources are accounts, which can auto accept invitations, based on how
> often they are already booked at the invitation date.
> E.g. we use that for booking of some meeting rooms, which obviously can
> only be booked once at the same time.
> 
> (You also get at least username <-> displayname <-> email addresses for
> your users, not just authentication.)
> 
> 
> > * Database (mysql or postgres)
> > * A mail server providing SMTP and IMAP
> > 
> 
> If you want to use server based automatic email sorting, automatic
> vacation messages and/or automatic email forwarding, then you need SIEVE
> too (as part of your IMAP server).
> 
> > something else?
> > 
> 
> Yes, Apache or nginx for static content delivery and reverse proxy for
> sogod.

Thank you for the information. I hope we are able to start now.


Greetings
-- 
R. Cirksena 
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] SOGo Web interface slow since upgrade to 3.0.2

[Adrian Figueroa]

Is there anything wrong with my configuration? I did not change it 
between updates anyway, so I do not think that it is the cause of the 
problem. I came from SOGo 3.0 and there were no issues.


Am 14.04.2016 um 21:52 schrieb Adrian Figueroa (adr...@figueroa.cc):
I installed SOGo as part of the iRedMail package. I think that a sieve 
server is running but I do not know any details. The logs of both 
apache and SOGo do not show any errors by the way.


Here is my sogo.conf:
https://s.coda.pw/?2c92588d72036759#1Gpf7sI7DS6bZtBptctyaZmGLmp3RpDG8JGao7gfkJM=

Adrian

Am 14.04.2016 um 20:42 schrieb "Qmail" (qm...@top-consulting.net):

Can you paste your sogo.conf ?

Did you setup a sieve server and if so, is it really working ?


On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 02:29 PM, Adrian Figueroa  wrote:

Hello,

I am having issues with the SOGo web interface. It is very slow
to load
and react anything.

It was running well before upgrading to 3.0.2. I have a worker
count of
40 and all other requests (Thunderbird, Exchange on phones etc.) run
fast and fine.

What could be the problem?

Kind regards,
Adrian
-- 
users@sogo.nu 

https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Samba4 SASLAuth, bypassed

[Ian McMichael]

On 15/04/16 07:51, Heiner Markert (mephi...@gmx.net) wrote:

For me it is *not* working.
Besides using TLS, I need to set
ldap server require strong auth = no
in order to get ldap auth working in sogo.
All other options of this smb parameter result in "strong(er) 
authentication required"-errors in sogo.log.


Any hints how to solve this? 


I am carrying out testing later today ahead of Canonical's Samba 4.3.8 
release for Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, which is scheduled for tomorrow.


How did you issue a certificate to your Samba server (self-signed, 
signed by a PKI, another option)?  Which options did you try in smb.conf?


I am planning to get my key certified by StartCom and use the following 
options in smb.conf:


tls enabled  = yes
tls keyfile  = tls/example.net.key
tls certfile = tls/example.net.pem
tls cafile   = tls/StartCom_Class_1_DV_Server_CA.pem
tls priority = SECURE192:+SECURE128:-VERS-SSL3.0

Hope this helps someone out and I will report back once I have carried 
out testing here...

--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists