Re: [SOGo] ldap addressbooks with filter based on dynamic ldap group

2016-11-17 Thread Francis Lachapelle
o use the entries for the ACLs. Can you show us your groups source definition? > Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2016 at 10:04 AM > From: "\"Christian Mack\" (christian.m...@uni-konstanz.de)" > To: users@sogo.nu > Subject: Re: [SOGo] ldap addressbooks with filter

Re: [SOGo] ldap addressbooks with filter based on dynamic ldap group

2016-11-09 Thread "sg gs"
ap addressbooks with filter based on dynamic ldap group Hello Am 08.11.2016 um 19:48 schrieb Francis Lachapelle (flachape...@inverse.ca): >> On Nov 7, 2016, at 10:26 AM, sg gs (s...@mail.com) wrote: >> >> btw: what about group based access rights for calendars and address book

Re: [SOGo] ldap addressbooks with filter based on dynamic ldap group

2016-11-09 Thread "sg gs"
@sogo.nu Subject: Re: [SOGo] ldap addressbooks with filter based on dynamic ldap group > On Nov 7, 2016, at 10:26 AM, sg gs (s...@mail.com) wrote: > > btw: what about group based access rights for calendars and address books? has this been implemeted/will it be implemented? This is alrea

Re: [SOGo] ldap addressbooks with filter based on dynamic ldap group

2016-11-09 Thread Christian Mack
Hello Am 08.11.2016 um 19:48 schrieb Francis Lachapelle (flachape...@inverse.ca): >> On Nov 7, 2016, at 10:26 AM, sg gs (s...@mail.com) wrote: >> >> btw: what about group based access rights for calendars and address books? >> has this been implemeted/will it be implemented? > > This is already

Re: [SOGo] ldap addressbooks with filter based on dynamic ldap group

2016-11-08 Thread Francis Lachapelle
> On Nov 7, 2016, at 10:26 AM, sg gs (s...@mail.com) wrote: > > btw: what about group based access rights for calendars and address books? > has this been implemeted/will it be implemented? This is already supported for LDAP sources. We handle object class of type group, groupofnames, groupofu

Re: [SOGo] ldap addressbooks with filter based on dynamic ldap group

2016-11-07 Thread "sg gs"
rs and address books? has this been implemeted/will it be implemented?     Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 at 3:01 PM From: "\"Francis Lachapelle\" (flachape...@inverse.ca)" To: users@sogo.nu Subject: Re: [SOGo] ldap addressbooks with filter based on dynamic ldap group Hello sg

Re: [SOGo] ldap addressbooks with filter based on dynamic ldap group

2016-11-07 Thread Francis Lachapelle
Hello sg > On Nov 4, 2016, at 12:16 PM, sg gs (s...@mail.com) wrote: > > hello, > all our active users (besides others) are members of group: > cn=enterpriseusers,dc=groups,o=example. > to restrict access to these memberes i added filters > (&(uid=%u)(memberof=cn=enterpriseusers,dc=groups,o=e

Re: [SOGo] ldap addressbooks with filter based on dynamic ldap group

2016-11-07 Thread "sg gs"
that's what i supposed. so i've got to go for a workaround.   thanks for the answer   Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 at 10:31 AM From: "\"Christian Mack\" (christian.m...@uni-konstanz.de)" To: users@sogo.nu Subject: Re: [SOGo] ldap addressbooks with filter base

Re: [SOGo] ldap addressbooks with filter based on dynamic ldap group

2016-11-07 Thread Christian Mack
Hello Am 04.11.2016 um 17:16 schrieb "sg gs" (s...@mail.com): > hello, > all our active users (besides others) are members of group: > cn=enterpriseusers,dc=groups,o=example. > to restrict access to these memberes i added filters > (&(uid=%u)(memberof=cn=enterpriseusers,dc=groups,o=example)) >

[SOGo] ldap addressbooks with filter based on dynamic ldap group

2016-11-04 Thread "sg gs"
hello, all our active users (besides others) are members of group:  cn=enterpriseusers,dc=groups,o=example. to restrict access to these memberes i added filters  (&(uid=%u)(memberof=cn=enterpriseusers,dc=groups,o=example)) to dovecot and postfix. these filters work perfect for dovecot and postf