Herb Martin wrote on Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:21:25 -0500:
When forwarding a batch of missed spam (or ham) from
Outlook back to SpamAssassin the best way seems to be
for our users to select more than a single message,
and use the menu: Action-Forward which puts them
all in as attachments.
I
Steve Martin wrote on Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:31:07 -0500:
(MacOS
X 10.4.2).
could it be something specific to the Mac or this Syslog version on this
OS X version?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center:
Hello jdow,
Tuesday, July 26, 2005, 3:03:23 PM, you wrote:
j whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] fidelity2.m0.net
j Fidelity Investment's Newsletters
Got it. Thanks. Will validate, and then publish shortly.
Bob Menschel
That is my best guess at this point.
On Jul 27, 2005, at 4:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Steve Martin wrote on Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:31:07 -0500:
(MacOS
X 10.4.2).
could it be something specific to the Mac or this Syslog version on
this
OS X version?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Chris Santerre wrote:
If they want ad tracking they can simply use gifs.
? Clarify please.
I need ad tracking... I've been keeping a database of URLs and passing IDs to
the redirection page, so it won't redirect to unauthorized URLs. But I don't
understand your use gifs method?
--
At 01:55 AM 7/27/2005, James Bucanek wrote:
I just upgraded my SA system and installed Razor.
I have two e-mail addresses set up for spam and ham reporting. Both are
sent to an mbox that is, twice an hour, shipped off to a script that runs
sa-learn.
When I installed Razor I modified the
Some stats from one of our SA servers. After about two days we
had:
9076 SURBL hits
5373 SC2 hits
4813 SC hits
1148 SC2 hits that did not also hit SC
588 SC hits that did not also hit SC2
3701 XS hits
1890 SC2 hits that did not hit XS
218 XS hits that did not hit SC2
jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
on 07/26/2005 05:03:23 PM:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fidelity2.m0.net
Fidelity Investment's Newsletters
{^_^}
Didn't know there was a SARE whitelist. Here's
another Fidelity E-Mail address we whitelist:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 10:05 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: New open http redirector?
Chris Santerre wrote:
If they want ad tracking they can simply use gifs.
? Clarify please.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 7:15 PM
To: jdow
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: generating rule stats from spamd logs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jdow writes:
From:
Matt Kettler wrote on Wednesday, July 27, 2005:
At 01:55 AM 7/27/2005, James Bucanek wrote:
I just upgraded my SA system and installed Razor.
I have two e-mail addresses set up for spam and ham reporting. Both are
sent to an mbox that is, twice an hour, shipped off to a script that runs
http://mosnews.com/news/2005/07/25/spammerdead.shtml Russias Biggest Spammer Brutally Murdered in ApartmentVardan Kushnir, notorious for sending spam to each and every citizen of Russia who appeared to have an e-mail, was found dead in his Moscow apartment on Sunday, Interfax reported Monday.
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:31:23 +0200:
It does. I sent a mail to them in German now. Let's see.
Got a reply that they know about the problem and are working on a
solution. Just their words ;-)
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services:
Another Dallas miracle!
Oh? Er, how does it determine if a message was ham
or spam?
It looks like
it is rather random based on the reports. BAYES_99
may well
hit on 84.33%
of spam. But I doubt, given it's score, it hits on
44.53% of ham.
The code should be
BAYES_00 hits 15.27 of spam on yours, the %ofspam on top ham rules and
%ofham on top spam rules must be buggy.
i'm not running that version with the 5th column. It must be buggy.
i play with it after bit.
Dallas
From: Andy Jezierski
Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
BAYES_00 hits 15.27 of spam on yours, the %ofspam on top ham rules and
%ofham on top spam rules must be buggy.
i'm not running that version with the 5th column. It must be buggy.
i play with it after bit.
Dallas
Dallas,
Did you see the patch I sent to the
http://mosnews.com/news/2005/07/25/spammerdead.shtml
Russia's Biggest Spammer Brutally Murdered in Apartment
Vardan Kushnir, notorious for sending spam to each and every citizen of
Russia who appeared to have an e-mail, was found dead in his Moscow
apartment
on Sunday, Interfax reported
M 10BAYES_9915351 4.46% 45.42% 60.57%
M 19BAYES_50 6443 1.87% 19.06% 25.42%
M 31BAYES_80 1154 0.34% 3.41% 4.55%
M 32BAYES_60 1147 0.33% 3.39% 4.53%
M 38
-Original Message-
From: Chris Thielen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 11:02 AM
To: Dallas L. Engelken
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: generating rule stats from spamd logs
Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
BAYES_00 hits 15.27 of spam on yours,
Dallas L. Engelken [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 07/27/2005 11:26:54 AM:
-Original Message-
From: Chris Thielen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 11:02 AM
To: Dallas L. Engelken
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: generating rule stats from
He only fixed the spam rules section.The TOP HAM RULES sections still has these two incorrect computations... my $perc2=sprintf("%.2f",($HAM_RULES{$key}/$NUM_SPAM)*100); my $perc3=sprintf("%.2f",($SPAM_RULES{$key}/$NUM_HAM)*100);Number of times a rule fired on ham / total number of spam
My mistake.. It is fixed, hopefully for good.
v0.9 - http://www.rulesemporium.com/programs/sa-stats.txt
TOP SPAM RULES FIRED
RANKRULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL %OFSPAM
%OFHAM
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Chris Santerre wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chris Santerre wrote:
If they want ad tracking they can simply use gifs.
? Clarify please.
I need ad tracking... I've been keeping a database of URLs
and passing IDs to the redirection
David B Funk wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Chris Santerre wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chris Santerre wrote:
If they want ad tracking they can simply use gifs.
? Clarify please.
I need ad tracking... I've been keeping a database of URLs
and passing IDs to the redirection page, so it
I have a pair of Spamassassin servers filtering e-mail (Spamassassin
3.0.4, spamd/spamc, Postfix, redhat 9) I was wondering if I could share the
bayes database between the two server rather than having each with its own and
having to do the salearn process twice.
Any Thoughts?
Chris Santerre wrote on Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:08:21 -0400:
If they want ad tracking they can simply use gifs.
gifs won't work in certain cases. And they won't work for web banners at
all. Remember this is a centralized solution, not one which counts
imprints on it's own site. *If* you need ad
unfortunately, I'm not sure if there's a workable workaround for that.
if you can come up with a pure-perl, non-spamassassin-based
test case, it might be worth reporting it to the perl
maintainers via perlbug...
sounds like they've made some stack-size assumptions that are
not valid
Robert Swan wrote:
I have a pair of Spamassassin servers filtering e-mail (Spamassassin
3.0.4, spamd/spamc, Postfix, redhat 9) I was wondering if I could share
the bayes database between the two server rather than having each with
its own and having to do the salearn process twice.
Any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
just to broaden the pool of recipients. Reminder: today's the deadline.
speak up quick if you're still running mass-check and haven't rsync'd
up the files yet!!
- --j.
- --- Forwarded Message
Date:Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:01:49 +0100
From:
- Forwarded message from Angry and Concerned Customer -
X-Scanned-By: milter-spamc/0.25.321 (localhost.nl2k.ab.ca [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 27
Jul 2005 13:11:47 -0600
Hi Dave - we are still getting people labeled as sending us spam that should
be on that white list (this includes emails
The Doctor wrote:
SNIP irate customer message
All right, the short and simple is that Spam-Assassin may not be doing
the correct job. This user has a whitelist in place and
some e-mail are getting the label of spam.
Even some of my cron jobs are getting a [SPAM] label when they should nt.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
excellent -- I see it's being discussed on p5p now. thanks for
doing that.
(fwiw, that one-liner doesn't crash on Ubuntu Hoary's perl 5.8.3.)
- --j.
John Narron writes:
unfortunately, I'm not sure if there's a workable workaround for that.
Justin Mason wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
excellent -- I see it's being discussed on p5p now. thanks for
doing that.
(fwiw, that one-liner doesn't crash on Ubuntu Hoary's perl 5.8.3.)
It works just fine on rh9 with:
This is perl, v5.8.4 built for
The Doctor writes:
- Forwarded message from Angry and Concerned Customer -
All right, the short and simple is that Spam-Assassin may not be doing
the correct job. This user has a whitelist in place and
some e-mail are getting the label of spam.
Even some of my cron jobs are
-Original Message-
From: Kai Schaetzl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 2:31 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: New open http redirector?
Chris Santerre wrote on Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:08:21 -0400:
If they want ad tracking they can simply
[EMAIL PROTECTED] BayesStore]# spamd -D
trying to connect to syslog/unix...
no error connecting to syslog/unix
logging enabled:
facility: mail
socket: unix
output: syslog
creating INET socket:
Listen: 128
LocalAddr: 127.0.0.1
LocalPort: 783
The Doctor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
on 07/27/2005 02:34:42 PM:
- Forwarded message from Angry and Concerned Customer -
X-Scanned-By: milter-spamc/0.25.321 (localhost.nl2k.ab.ca [0.0.0.
0]); Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:11:47 -0600
[snip]
All right, the short and simple is that
-Original Message-
From: Jim Maul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 3:00 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: SpamAssassin, FreeBSD, Perl 5.8.7, bus errors, oh my!
Justin Mason wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 03:48:22PM -0400, Jim Maul wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
SNIP irate customer message
All right, the short and simple is that Spam-Assassin may not be doing
the correct job. This user has a whitelist in place and
some e-mail are getting the label of spam.
Even some
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't locate Mail/Spamassassin/BayesStore/SQL.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
It is SpamAssassin, notice the uppercase A in Assassin.
Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
How would I fix this issue. Is it in a script?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't locate Mail/Spamassassin/BayesStore/SQL.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
It is SpamAssassin, notice the uppercase A in Assassin.
Michael
(Q) Given that this RH machine runs only POP3 (management will not
allow anything else) how do I set up my /etc/procmailrc file such that
all mail that is marked as SPAM is put into the users $HOME/mail/spam
file (they can then login using SSH and use Pine to look at SPAM if
$LOGNAME is
OK something is wrong with your setup!
Sample 1 from a cron job:
Subject: [SPAM] Cron [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/bin/nice -20
X-Spam-Flag: NO
--
Marked as spam but not?
Sample 2
Headers:
Subject: [SPAM: score=5.4/5.0] spam
The Doctor wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 03:48:22PM -0400, Jim Maul wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
SNIP irate customer message
All right, the short and simple is that Spam-Assassin may not be doing
the correct job. This user has a whitelist in place and
some e-mail are getting the label of
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 04:00:15PM -0400, Jim Maul wrote:
Justin Mason wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
excellent -- I see it's being discussed on p5p now. thanks for
doing that.
(fwiw, that one-liner doesn't crash on Ubuntu Hoary's perl 5.8.3.)
It works
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 04:02:32PM -0400, Ron Johnson wrote:
The Doctor writes:
- Forwarded message from Angry and Concerned Customer -
All right, the short and simple is that Spam-Assassin may not be doing
the correct job. This user has a whitelist in place and
some
Also, post the whitelist entry you're using... And what
file it's in, and how
you're calling SA.
Whitelist from user/.spamassassin/user_prefs:
NEVER post other peoples' email addresses to a public and archived list!!!
Deep breaths Doc!
--Chris
score gtube 4.0
score razor2_check4
score RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_11_50 4
score RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 4
score DCC_CHECK 5
score PYZOR_CHECK 5
score REMOVE_IN_QUOTES4
score CLICK_TO_REMOVE_2 4
score ASCII_FORM_ENTRY4
score TRACKER_ID 4
*snip*
Holy
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 04:40:40PM -0400, JamesDR wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 03:48:22PM -0400, Jim Maul wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
SNIP irate customer message
All right, the short and simple is that Spam-Assassin may not be doing
the correct job. This user has a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How would I fix this issue. Is it in a script?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't locate Mail/Spamassassin/BayesStore/SQL.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
It is SpamAssassin, notice the uppercase A in Assassin.
Michael
Check your bayes_store_module
Chris Santerre wrote:
My point is whatever code/script the redir is running to generate tracking
IDs in a URL can ALWAYS be run from a company's own server. Regardless of
the method, the sender could always do it.
You're still making an assumption that what they're tracking is ad *views*.
The Doctor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
on 07/27/2005 03:51:13 PM:
[snip]
X-Spam-Status: NO, hits=2.20 required=5.00
X-Spam-Level: xx
X-Mark-SPAM: YES, score=5.40/5.00, processed for 2.536s on doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
[...]
What looks odd to me is that X-Spam-Status says NO (I'm
Chris Santerre wrote:
score gtube 4.0
*snip*
Holy carp!!! Why did you rescore just about every rule higher?
An even better question.. why did he try to rescore GTUBE down to 4.0?
Although that was slightly screwed up by not puting the rule name in all-caps,
GTUBE should always
The Doctor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
on 07/27/2005 03:42:41 PM:
[snip]
In my /etc/rc for spam assassin I have,
echo -n ' Spam Assassin'; /usr/contrib/bin/spamd
-d -i -D -u
defang --user-config --siteconfigpath=/etc/mail/spamassassin --
syslog=/var/log/spamd.log
Chris Santerre wrote on Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:14:13 -0400:
So your saying the cost of email marketing would rise.
Chris, I did't think about email at all ;-) Maybe I'm wrong and the use of
this redirector is mostly for email. I thought of it as a central tracker
which gets launched when someone
Mass check submissions are closed. I won't be picking up any more.
Thanks everyone!
Henry Stern wrote:
As far as I know, I am only waiting on one person's mass-check results.
Unless you speak up before he uploads them, I'm going to start the
score generation without you! ;)
Henry
-Original Message-
From: Kelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 4:59 PM
To: 'users@spamassassin.apache.org'
Subject: Re: New open http redirector?
Chris Santerre wrote:
My point is whatever code/script the redir is running to
generate tracking
IDs
I attempted to do that once, with a
network file system, but it didnt seem to know how to handle the locking
properly. I know I did something wrong, so if anyone else has a solution,
Id also be happy to hear it! J
-Alan Fullmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.xnote.com
www.zoobuh.com
Boy... anytime I've done some kind of network file sharing across
a system or two, I have never done it for good performance reasons...
only convenience sakes. And even then, never large files.
Almost a decade ago when I was performing massive COBOL database
conversions to load data into flat
I posted a message the other day asking why my spamd might backlog
periodically and someone asked me if I could see from the log what was
happening. It started again today and I see something. the last
entry in the log when the jam occurred said
autolearn=unavailable
when I stopped
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 05:25:42PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
Chris Santerre wrote:
score gtube 4.0
*snip*
Holy carp!!! Why did you rescore just about every rule higher?
An even better question.. why did he try to rescore GTUBE down to 4.0?
Although that was
Alan Fullmer wrote:
I attempted to do that once, with a network file system, but it didn’t
seem to know how to handle the locking properly. I know I did something
wrong, so if anyone else has a solution, I’d also be happy to hear it! J
As JamesDR suggested.. Do it right, use SQL. It's a
Chris Santerre wrote:
From: Kelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 4:59 PM
To: 'users@spamassassin.apache.org'
Subject: Re: New open http redirector?
Chris Santerre wrote:
My point is whatever code/script the redir is running to generate
tracking IDs in a URL
The Doctor wrote:
Next?
My honest suggestion?
Stop everything, and take a step back. Read, think about the options, then act.
First, Fix your setup as Andy Jezerski suggested. Have ONE and only ONE call to
spamassassin. You've got 3 right now. Two milters and a procmail call. That's
VERY
From: Kai Schaetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Doctor wrote on Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:34:42 -0600:
This is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ah, it's he again. Setting to ignore mode.
Kai
He rather is an example of why we tended not to allow our doctorates
into the lab when I was doing
jdow wrote:
From: Slava Madrit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
If you received this transmission in error, please contact the
sender by reply e-mail or by telephone (+1(212)632-5500)
-
In other words as soon as the SpamAssassin
jdow wrote:
From: Slava Madrit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
and delete and destroy all copies of the material, including all
copies stored in the recipient's computer, printed or saved to disk.
Does that also mean we should all show up at Slava's
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 04:45:36PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
The whitelist in question:
user/.spamassassin/user_prefs:
snip
And the spamassassin is called as follows:
echo -n ' Spam Assassin'; /usr/contrib/bin/spamd -d -i -D -u
Hello,
The SURBL Rules do not appear to be working for me. I think I am
missing something basic.
The test:
First Test: Telnet into my MTA and manually enter the SMTP
Commands to send an email from a bogus address, email content is the same as
the other tests.
Timothy Spear wrote:
Hello,
The SURBL Rules do not appear to be working for me. I think I am
missing something basic.
The test:
First Test: Telnet into my MTA and manually enter the SMTP
Commands to send an email from a bogus address, email content is the same
I am running 0.53; straight from CPAN.
Any other ideas?
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Rick Macdougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 8:13 PM
To: Timothy Spear
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: SURBL Rules Not Being Used
Timothy Spear wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 09:08:28PM -0400, Timothy Spear wrote:
Any other ideas?
The first thing for any issue is: run with -D and see what's happening.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Q. Why is this so clumsy?
A. The trick is to use Perl's strengths rather than its weaknesses.
Found it. I hade two versions of Perl installed, spamassassin was picking up
the test install I did of version 6. Which had no Net::DNS installed.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 9:25 PM
To:
On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 10:33 +0100, Nigel kendrick wrote:
I have just had a bogus Microsoft update slip through the net. Is there a
rule to combat these? In any case, here's the info in case it's of use:
snip
IMHO that's a virus, not spam. You should prolly install ClamAV on your
mail server.
On Wednesday 27 July 2005 19:46, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
jdow wrote:
From: Slava Madrit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
and delete and destroy all copies of the material, including all
copies stored in the recipient's computer, printed or saved to
Setup Redhat 9
Spamassassin 3.0.4
I am struggling with learning the basics about spamassassin. I think I
=
have it going now but I am still not sure. I stumbled into a working =
scenario. Somehow Sendmail is calling procmal for me so I do nto need =
the .forward file. If someone knows how that
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 06:00:58PM -0600, The Doctor wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 04:45:36PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
The whitelist in question:
user/.spamassassin/user_prefs:
snip
And the spamassassin is called as follows:
Hello Frank,
Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 3:02:23 PM, you wrote:
FMC I posted a message the other day asking why my spamd might
FMC backlog periodically and someone asked me if I could see from the
FMC log what was happening. It started again today and I see
FMC something. the last entry in the
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 09:11:22PM -0500, John D. Maag wrote:
scenario. Somehow Sendmail is calling procmal for me so I do nto need =
the .forward file. If someone knows how that could be happening I would
love to know how I got lucky.
Most Linux distros, since you said you're using RH9,
What about tracking clicks? Suppose you have a website with ads -- or
search results -- on it, and you want to keep track of which links to
third party sites get followed. You can't do that with a web bug. You
can only do that by setting up a redirect script so that you log the
click, then
The Bayes system will occasionally determine that it needs to expire
old entries, to keep the database files within reasonable size, and
that expiration can take a long while.
is there a file I can check to see if it has become large? better yet is
there some kind of routine to run to do the
The Bayes system will occasionally determine that it needs to expire
old entries, to keep the database files within reasonable size, and
that expiration can take a long while.
is there a file I can check to see if it has become large?
Yes. I don't know quite how to do it, so someone else
Hello Andy,
Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 7:13:01 AM, you wrote:
AJ Didn't know there was a SARE whitelist.
Discussed on this list a few months back, while experimenting with it
on my own system. Then announced it here when published, but otherwise
it's been quiet. Worth mentioning from time to
Ok, If I put preferences in the user_prefs file in $HOME/.spamassassin, do I
call the file the same thing in /etc/mail/spamassassin?
Hello Frank,
Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 8:34:02 PM, you wrote:
The Bayes system will occasionally determine that it needs to expire
old entries, to keep the database files within reasonable size, and
that expiration can take a long while.
FMC is there a file I can check to see if it has
-Original Message-
From: Kai Schaetzl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Herb Martin wrote on Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:21:25 -0500:
When forwarding a batch of missed spam (or ham) from
Outlook back to
SpamAssassin the best way seems to be for our users to select more
than a single
86 matches
Mail list logo
