Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 06:16:15PM -0400, Rob McEwen wrote:
MS Exchange... one big Database
Exactly...
And that is one reason why I wouldn't touch this SQL idea with a 10 foot
pole.. the fact that Exchange works this
Steve Thomas wrote:
While this is quite an interesting topic, I have to ask why it's on the
spamassassin list. Message stores aren't spamassassin specific and this is
already a pretty high-volume list. Does this discussion really belong
here?
St-
The reason I posted it here as well as
Gary W. Smith wrote:
It's getting there, albeit slowly. I think that if you rule out any up
and coming application but it's just not there yet we wouldn't have an
opensource community...
We have a variety of reasons for using MySQL, most of them aren't good
ones though but it's something
Hi,I have updated my SA installation yesterday. Most but not all seems to run well.In my mail.log I constantly find these errors all referring on some methods called from PerMsgStatus.pm:snip
Jun 10 12:21:54 homesrv spamd[6367]: Failed to run __ENV_AND_HDR_FROM_MATCH SpamAssassin test,
Thomas Schlosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-06-2006 15:38]:
[...]
I updated it via perl -MCPAN - e shell - force install Mail::SpamAssassin
The output was too long to have a chance to see if any problems have been
reportet.
New SA should have been installed somewhere around /usr/local (if your
perl
Thanks for the immediate answer!It seems that the old SA was under /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/Mail/SpamAssassin/while the new one under /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/Mail/SpamAssassin/rpm reported two packages spamassassin and perl-spamassassin.
I have deinstalled these using YAST (rpm
Sur 2006-06-09, Marc Perkel skribis:
Perhaps the headers and other information that you would index
be kept in the database and the body of the message stored
somewhere else, perhaps even as files.
It seems that this is what Zimbra does. Check out my blog post
here:
For IMAP, SQL just
All:
My hosted mail server is Fedora Core 4, and I'd rather not put a
development environment on it if I can avoid doing so. Is anybody
hosting binary RPMs for SA 3.1.x (ideally 3.1.3) for FC4?
Thanks.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZICQ#15735746http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NM Public wrote:
Sur 2006-06-09, Marc Perkel skribis:
Perhaps the headers and other information that you would index be
kept in the database and the body of the message stored somewhere
else, perhaps even as files.
It seems that this is what Zimbra does. Check out my blog post here:
I would defer to the smart people to figure out the details. However I do
wonder if the actual body content of the message would be best stored in a
file and the SQL used to store anything and everything you would want to
index. That would keep the SQL file size down if that's an issue.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John D. Hardin wrote:
All:
My hosted mail server is Fedora Core 4, and I'd rather not put a
development environment on it if I can avoid doing so. Is anybody
hosting binary RPMs for SA 3.1.x (ideally 3.1.3) for FC4?
Don't know about 3.1.3,
"fast enough" is a value judgement.
Fast enough may be ok, if you have a few hundred or even a few thousand
users, saving small mailboxes.
In a large scale system, where you have a million users, each of which
has thousands of messages, I doubt any current database, SQL or other
will have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A message with this set of SA headers just made it through to my mailbox.
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on
iceman12.giac.net
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.0 required=6.8
On 6/10/2006 8:07 PM, David Goldsmith wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A message with this set of SA headers just made it through to my mailbox.
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on
iceman12.giac.net
X-Spam-Level: **
From: NM Public [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sur 2006-06-09, Marc Perkel skribis:
Perhaps the headers and other information that you would index
be kept in the database and the body of the message stored
somewhere else, perhaps even as files.
It seems that this is what Zimbra does. Check out my blog
From: Craig McLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John D. Hardin wrote:
All:
My hosted mail server is Fedora Core 4, and I'd rather not put a
development environment on it if I can avoid doing so. Is anybody
hosting binary RPMs for SA 3.1.x (ideally 3.1.3) for
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 01:23:35PM -0600, wrote:
I would defer to the smart people to figure out the details. However I do
wonder if the actual body content of the message would be best stored in a
file and the SQL used to store anything and everything you would want to
index. That
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 01:23:35PM -0600, wrote:
I would defer to the smart people to figure out the details. However I do
wonder if the actual body content of the message would be best stored in a
file and the SQL used to store anything and everything you would want
18 matches
Mail list logo
