Agnello George schrieb:
Hi
i have installed amavisd new on my postfix mailserver. Now i need to test
spam , so I sent a mail with the following text in the body ( see link )
.. this is found at http://spamassassin.apache.org/gtube/ .
As per the logs the mal is being blocked, but our
- Original Message -
From: Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Obantec Support [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 11:29 PM
Subject: Re: sa-update
Obantec Support wrote:
Hi
i run sa-update from cron and last update seems to be Oct18 2007
Rob, that could be a MailScanner config problem. You don't say which
version of MailScanner, alas.
In /etc/MailScanner/MailScanner.conf check the Spamassassin Local State
Dir line.
Mine reads:
SpamAssassin Local State Dir = # /var/lib/spamassassin
Cheers,
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Guys,
How can I fix this?
error: Can't locate Sys/Syslog/Win32.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i586-linux-thread-multi
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i586-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8
Thanks for your response Phil,
In an attempt to resolve the issue, I'm now using MailScanner 4.64.3 and
have started from a fresh config file, so my Spamassassin Local State Dir
line also reads:
SpamAssassin Local State Dir = # /var/lib/spamassassin
And, as I mentioned, a lint test shows that
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 02:04:31 -0400
Payne [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Guys,
How can I fix this?
error: Can't locate Sys/Syslog/Win32.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i586-linux-thread-multi
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8
Right, and what does the
MailScanner --debug --debug-sa
output say it is using?
Cheers,
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Rob Starr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 October 2007 12:29
To:
Is there a rule where I can give a score for enevelope from not
matching header from
Atleast the domain part
for eg, if someone forges my banks domain name in the header from ( They
cant use that in the envelope from because my bank uses SPF records and
phishers get caught easily ) then I want
A few weeks ago, I posted the following question:
Hello
I have a severe problem with one of my mailservers. I'm using spamassassin
3.2.3 in combination with exim 4.66, and experience hanging spamd processes
which consume all my server resources.
I've searched these mailing lists, searched
Boy, that's a handy command. I'll have to write that one down.
I'm getting:
In Debugging mode, not forking...
SpamAssassin temp dir = /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming/SpamAssassin-Temp
debug: Score set 0 chosen.
debug: running in taint mode? no
debug: ignore: test message to precompile patterns
Hi,
I don't know if this is relevant for you or not, but on our mail
server I could not get sa-update to work, either. I noticed that if
the directory was not there, however, it would work. So a down and
dirty approach I took was writing a crop job that removes that
directory just before
Thanks Andy,
I have verified that sa-update is running and the rules folder is getting
populated with lots of files.
-Original Message-
From: Andy Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October-30-07 9:35 AM
To: Randal, Phil
Cc: Rob Starr; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re:
Hi,
Read this http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/amavisd-settings.html
And you’ll be set.
Regards,
Leon Kolchinsky
From: Agnello George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 8:31 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Hello,
I want to remove the mails on which a score above 30
Thank you in advance for your help
Xou
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/remove-email-tf4718582.html#a13489061
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 06:49:25 -0700 (PDT)
xou4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Hello,
I want to remove the mails on which a score above 30
Thank you in advance for your help
Xou
Your email server software (MTA) has to do that. SpamAssassin just
scans what you feed it. It does not
xou4 schrieb:
Hello,
I want to remove the mails on which a score above 30
Thank you in advance for your help
spamassassin tags messages whatever filter you use could do this ...
Xou
--
Grüsse/Greetings
MH
Dont send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Matthias Haegele schrieb:
xou4 schrieb:
Hello,
I want to remove the mails on which a score above 30
Thank you in advance for your help
spamassassin tags messages whatever filter you use could do this ...
Perhaps you want to use amavisd-new or procmail or ...
(Using
debug: using /usr/share/spamassassin for default rules dir
Oh dear, that's definitely wrong.
You should have
config: using /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002003 for default rules dir
try setting the MailScanner.conf line to
SpamAssassin Local State Dir = # /var/lib/spamassassin
And see if that
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:00:52 +0100
Matthias Haegele [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Matthias Haegele schrieb:
xou4 schrieb:
Hello,
I want to remove the mails on which a score above 30
Thank you in advance for your help
spamassassin tags messages whatever filter you use could do
xou4 schrieb:
Hello,
I want to remove the mails on which a score above 30
Or for procmail (this rule is for 20, add or decrease \* as appropriate):
:0
* ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
/dev/null
The documentation for whitelist_from_rcvd shows examples like this:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] example.com
What if the sending server has no rDNS? Is there a way to use this feature
with a numeric IP instead of a rDNS domain? If so, what is the syntax?
Thanks, Larry
Matt Kettler writes:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Justin Mason wrote:
OK, we really need to figure out some way to kill these FAQs off. Every
week, someone asks a question about why SpamAssassin is killing their
server, and most of the time the answer is stop using blacklist.cf and
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 11:57 -0400, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
The documentation for whitelist_from_rcvd shows examples like this:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] example.com
What if the sending server has no rDNS?
They you can't use whitelist_from_rcvd, and the sender needs to fix
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 08:35 -0500, Andy Norris wrote:
Hi,
I don't know if this is relevant for you or not, but on our mail
server I could not get sa-update to work, either. I noticed that if
the directory was not there, however, it would work.
Sounds like a permissions issue.
So a
Daniel J McDonald wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 08:35 -0500, Andy Norris wrote:
So a down and
dirty approach I took was writing a crop job that removes that
directory just before running sa-update.
So, you delete it every time, even when there are no updates? And since
updates occur about
No, it was not a permissions issue. I'll get back to working on it
soon, but, yes there were newer versions than what I was seeing on my
server. There are so many posts about sa-update not working. I'm sure
sa-update works, for some folks, but it wasn't for me, and I had to
quit spending
Andy Norris wrote:
No, it was not a permissions issue. I'll get back to working on it soon,
but, yes there were newer versions than what I was seeing on my server.
There are so many posts about sa-update not working. I'm sure sa-update
works, for some folks, but it wasn't for me, and I had
I appreciate that you would like to see it working right, Daryl. To
that, I'd add, me, too. But, like I said, I had to move on, and I
hope to get back to it soon. And, by the way, I played with setting
the update paths to all kinds of places, and all kinds of
permissions, too. ;-) I'm sure
Excerpt, headers from a generated message from myspace (I have folded
lines for legibility) :
Received: from vmta17.myspace.com (vmta17.myspace.com [204.16.33.80])
by cayenne.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l9U3N5he001961
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:23:10 -0400
Hi friends,
It has solved the problem of the message headers to SA to work with SPF, this
has been done by applying the Qmail patch QmailSpfPatch which is on the web
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/QmailSpfPatch
Thanks
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 11:13:06 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday, October 26, 2007 11:55 PM +0200 KarstenBräckelmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NOTE: I only did a very brief investigation of Date: headers sent by
The Bat! users on this list. If anyone can assure this, or got any
inside knowledge whether The Bat! can or can not generate such headers
SpamAssassin version 3.2.3
running on Perl version 5.8.8
mimedefang version 2.63
sendmail Version 8.14.0
I have been running spamassassin for over 2 years now, and suddenly, the
required score has changed. I have it set to 7.0, but it has suddenly
changed back to the default of 5.0. I only
Hi Guys,
I'm running a Qmail server with spamassassin + clamav + Simscam.
The server i'm using is a HP ML110 CPU PIV (3.2 GHZ) 2mb chache , 1GB RAM.
The problem is, the i'm getting very high load because spamd is the processes
which take the most part of the load
(invoked by spamassassin) si
On Oct 30, 2007 12:27 PM, Joseph Brennan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Notice the all-lower-case field names, which do not conform to the
RFC 2822 field names that they almost match. That is, a from:
header is not the same as a From: header!
It's *supposed* to be the same. RFC *822 does not
FWFW, I ran masschecks on the original posted rules and got zero hits in any
corpus. That rather surprised me. But it may indicate that this is either
a very recent thing or isn't all that universal.
Loren
On Friday, October 26, 2007 11:55 PM +0200 KarstenBräckelmann
[EMAIL
Joseph Brennan wrote:
Excerpt, headers from a generated message from myspace (I have folded
lines for legibility) :
Received: from vmta17.myspace.com (vmta17.myspace.com [204.16.33.80])
by cayenne.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l9U3N5he001961
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 29
Justin Mason wrote:
Matt, any chance you could open a bz feature request for this?
Done.. also added to it so there's now 3 warning level options.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5710
--j.
37 matches
Mail list logo
