Hello,
Since rating.cloudmark.com stopped offering their services, I was wondering
whether someone here knows of another reliable reputation service like that?
I had such nice SA rules for it, and, now that they're gone, I miss that
functionality.
I still use a somewhat older SA, 3.1.6;
Hi,
I have doing some checking of spam messages that make it through our
mail filtering systems and noticed that the spam score does not reflect
what I get when checking manually.
An example spam report:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.068 tagged_above=- required=5
tests=[BAYES_50=0.001,
I know if there is a misconfiguration in one of the config files SA will
usually skip it and keep running.
Does the same hold true for extraneous data within the userpref SQL
table? I have a custom Postfix policy and would rather use the existing
userpref table than to create an additional table
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:29:21AM -0500, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
I have doing some checking of spam messages that make it through our
mail filtering systems and noticed that the spam score does not reflect
what I get when checking manually.
An example spam report:
X-Spam-Status: No,
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:29:21AM -0500, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
I have doing some checking of spam messages that make it through our
mail filtering systems and noticed that the spam score does not reflect
what I get when checking manually.
An example spam report:
John D. Hardin wrote:
score URIBL_SBL 5
Discussion of the advisability of a single poison-pill rule is for
another day, though if you *do* want to spamcan everything that hits
SBL you'd be better served doing it at the MTA layer as a regular
DNSBL test.
Also, isn't SBL folded into Zen
Hi all,
strangely, I am getting this error message, since an upgrade, a few
months ago:
plugin: failed to parse plugin /etc/mail/spamassassin/VBounce.pm:
Can't locate /etc/mail/spamassassin/VBounce.pm in @INC (@INC
contains: /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i686-linux /usr/local/
Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:29:21AM -0500, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
I have doing some checking of spam messages that make it through our
mail filtering systems and noticed that the spam score does not
reflect what I get when checking manually.
An
On Dec 12, 2007, at 11:09 PM, Mark wrote:
Since rating.cloudmark.com stopped offering their services, I was
wondering
whether someone here knows of another reliable reputation service
like that?
I had such nice SA rules for it, and, now that they're gone, I miss
that
functionality.
My
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Kelson wrote:
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:58:42 -0800
From: Kelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Adjusting SA scores in 50_scores.cf...
John D. Hardin wrote:
score URIBL_SBL 5
Discussion of the advisability of a single
Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:29:21AM -0500, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
I have doing some checking of spam messages that make it through
our mail filtering systems and noticed that the spam score does not
reflect what I get when
Richard Frovarp wrote:
Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:29:21AM -0500, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
I have doing some checking of spam messages that make it through
our mail filtering systems and noticed that the spam score does
not
Does anyone know if there's a way to score *all* emails at the server with
scores from 0-100, then delete all emails at the server with scores of over
10 and deliver the rest with the scores in the subject title please ?
Any help much appreciated.
Chris.
Chris wrote:
Does anyone know if there's a way to score *all* emails at the server
with scores from 0-100, then delete all emails at the server with
scores of over 10 and deliver the rest with the scores in the subject
title please ?
Any help much appreciated.
Chris.
Spamassassin only
Chris wrote:
Does anyone know if there's a way to score *all* emails at the server with
scores from 0-100, then delete all emails at the server with scores of over
10 and deliver the rest with the scores in the subject title please ?
Any help much appreciated.
Chris.
MailScanner can do that
Chris wrote:
Does anyone know if there's a way to score *all* emails at the server with
scores from 0-100, then delete all emails at the server with scores of over
10 and deliver the rest with the scores in the subject title please ?
Any help much appreciated.
Chris.
simscan for qmail can
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:14:16AM -0500, Erik Dasque wrote:
strangely, I am getting this error message, since an upgrade, a few
months ago:
plugin: failed to parse plugin /etc/mail/spamassassin/VBounce.pm:
Can't locate /etc/mail/spamassassin/VBounce.pm in @INC (@INC
[...]
I can find
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:24:07 +0100
Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know if there's a way to score *all* emails at the server
with scores from 0-100, then delete all emails at the server with
scores of over 10 and deliver the rest with the scores in the subject
title please ?
Any
Hmmm,
I wish I could do that but I can't find that reference anywhere.
20_vbounce.cf:# response to mail you really *did* send. See 'perldoc
VBounce.pm' for more
20_vbounce.cf:loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::VBounce VBounce.pm
20_vbounce.cf:ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::VBounce
Ken Goods wrote:
Spamassassin only scores emails. You'll need another application to do
something with them. I use MailScanner and what you need is easily done with
it. It gives you many other options as well. I think Amavis-new and
Mailwatch may do the same thing but have no experience with
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:29:21AM -0500, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
I have doing some checking of spam messages that make it through our
mail filtering systems and noticed that the spam score does not reflect
what I get when checking manually.
An example spam report:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:04:46 -0500
Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Duane Hill wrote:
I know if there is a misconfiguration in one of the config files SA
will usually skip it and keep running.
Well, it might.. It will essentially start discarding data until it
can make sense of
Is there a central repository somewhere of custom plugins available for
SA? I've find a few in the wiki but I was wondering if there was a site
that had a good selection of them?
Thanks!
J
X-SpamFilter-By: BOX Solutions SpamTrap 1.1 with qID lBDNlb6m031347, This
message is to be blocked by code: bkndr63272
Subject: [Spam-Mail] We invite you to join us as a Silver PowerSeller! (This
message should be blocked: bkndr63272)
Shame they didn't just block it so I woudln't have to!
Does anyone know if there's a way to score *all* emails at
the server with
scores from 0-100, then delete all emails at the server with
scores of over
10 and deliver the rest with the scores in the subject title please ?
Any help much appreciated.
Chris.
MimeDefang -
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:08:24PM -0500, Don Ireland wrote:
I've got a PHP script that passes each message in special Ham Spam
folders through SALearn. This script is run via a cron job. The cron
damon is sending me the following message every time it tries to run my
script. What could
I've got a PHP script that passes each message in special Ham Spam
folders through SALearn. This script is run via a cron job. The cron
damon is sending me the following message every time it tries to run my
script. What could be causing this?
Thanks.
Jason Bennett wrote:
Is there a central repository somewhere of custom plugins available for
SA? I've find a few in the wiki but I was wondering if there was a site
that had a good selection of them?
Well, the wiki has a list 29 of them, which I would consider more than
a few:
Thank you, Meng, for your thoughtful and extensive reply
It looks mighty shiny so far. :) I'll subscribe to the mailing list, too.
And I see Shevek is part of it, too, so it looks all very promising.
I hope the cost of using it won't be too prohibitive, but this looks
at least like exactly
29 matches
Mail list logo
