i would like to give some score for messages that came from IP
addresses that does not have the reverse correctly configured. I have
seen a lot of IPs that have some reverse name, but that name does not
point back to the IP address.
is it possible to score no reverse at all and/or no
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, mouss wrote:
Oooo! Script critique! My turn!
# Filter for Spam
cat | $SPAMASSASSIN out.$$
cat out.$$ | /usr/sbin/sendmail -io -f $ORIGIN $TARGET
I too love cats. but $cmd $file does the same as
cat $file | $cmd.
Why even
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of snowcrash+sa
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 2:14 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: SA 32x build not finding openssl headers on FreeBSD?
i'm migrating to SA 32x-branch/svn (r607171) on
Laurent LEVIER wrote:
At 02:36 29/12/2007, mouss wrote:
what is smtpd-laurent? symlink hacks aren't recommended. if you want
different logs, use multiple instances.
That's a jail. If you dont setup something to discriminate process
between them, 8 jails will produce 8 smtpd in the global ps
-Original Message-
From: Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 8:02 AM
To: spamassassin ML
Subject: question on reverse DNS
i would like to give some score for messages that came from IP
addresses that does not have the
Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote:
i would like to give some score for messages that came from IP
addresses that does not have the reverse correctly configured. I have
seen a lot of IPs that have some reverse name, but that name does not
point back to the IP address.
is it possible
Matt Kettler escreveu:
Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote:
i would like to give some score for messages that came from IP
addresses that does not have the reverse correctly configured. I have
seen a lot of IPs that have some reverse name, but that name does not
point back to the IP
Matt Kettler wrote:
When compared to someone using zone transfers, it's still likely to be
marginally faster because the Ip::Country::Fast code and database are
both optimized for doing this kind of query very quickly.
You're right - I ran some tests, and Ip::Country::Fast is not just
Michael Scheidell escreveu:
-Original Message-
From: Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 8:02 AM
To: spamassassin ML
Subject: question on reverse DNS
i would like to give some score for messages that came from IP
addresses
dvesely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have setup bounce notification for my spamassasin mail server but my
server manager has reccomended that I do not use it. He wrote:
We can't configure Bouncing the SPAM message at Server level, but we can
do this at domain level.
If we configured to bounce
Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote:
i would like to give some score for messages that came from IP
addresses that does not have the reverse correctly configured. I have
seen a lot of IPs that have some reverse name, but that name does not
point back to the IP address.
You might want to
hi michael,
I am the official ports maintainer for the SA port on Freebsd.
:-)
I notice you are using the ports version of openssl,
yes
but not the ports version of SA (you are using SVN) and you are mixing a ports
version of openssl with the SVN version of SA.
since SA project is 'fast
Laurent LEVIER wrote:
[snip]
for SA, just use amavisd-new. It can also do antivirus check, but if you
want to reject infected mail, then you need to run amavisd-new as a
proxy_filter (before the queue). If you really want this, then configure
amavisd-new to listen on multiple sockets and one
I experience the same problem.
Lots of spam and normal e-mail have X_Spam_Status: No, score=. And
X_spam_Flag: NO
But not all. Sometimes it is: Yes, score=7.7 and marked as spam, sometimes
No, score=2.0 and ofcourse not marked as spam. Even No, score=0.0.
What is causing this and how can it be
Henk S wrote:
I experience the same problem.
Lots of spam and normal e-mail have X_Spam_Status: No, score=. And
X_spam_Flag: NO
But not all. Sometimes it is: Yes, score=7.7 and marked as spam, sometimes
No, score=2.0 and ofcourse not marked as spam. Even No, score=0.0.
What is causing this
15 matches
Mail list logo
