spamassassin eating lot of RAM

2008-01-13 Thread Jai Gupta
My server has 8GB of ram, around 4 GB is currently used by spamassassin (too many process of /usr/bin/perl -T /usr/local/psa/admin/sbin/spammng -c -C --max-children=1 start). Is this normal? Can I somehow limit the process concurrency of spamassassin or I could limit the amount of RAM it

Re: spamassassin eating lot of RAM

2008-01-13 Thread Jeff Chan
Quoting Jai Gupta [EMAIL PROTECTED]: My server has 8GB of ram, around 4 GB is currently used by spamassassin (too many process of /usr/bin/perl -T /usr/local/psa/admin/sbin/spammng -c -C --max-children=1 start). Is this normal? Can I somehow limit the process concurrency of spamassassin or I

RE: Problem with handle_user

2008-01-13 Thread Matthew Goodman
A downgrade to SpamAssassin 3.2.3 returns functionality with per-user settings immediately. Any notes on what handle_user does and whether this is a new function of 3.2.4? I'd like to find out more about handle_user as it seems to be specific to 3.2.4 Thanks -Original Message- From:

Re: spamassassin eating lot of RAM

2008-01-13 Thread Jai Gupta
Thanks Jeff, Some stats could be seen on http://stats.jaigupta.com/com/jaigupta.com-memory.html and http://stats.jaigupta.com/com/jaigupta.com-processes.html spamassassin is using RAM with an linearly increasing rate, if it is not stopped soon my server will end with its all RAM used by

RE: Googlepages Livefilestore spams

2008-01-13 Thread Mike Cisar
Have seen a bunch more Google btnI spam the past couple days, seem to be triggering just fine on the rules posted elsewhere on this thread. However, these last bunch seem to have a trick, the only other text in the message aside from the URL seems to be a date string. Somehow that must totally

Re: spamassassin eating lot of RAM

2008-01-13 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Jai Gupta wrote: My server has 8GB of ram, around 4 GB is currently used by spamassassin (too many process of /usr/bin/perl -T /usr/local/psa/admin/sbin/spammng -c -C --max-children=1 start). spammng is not SpamAssassin. Tell whatever is spawning this process to limit the number of these it

Re: Problem with handle_user

2008-01-13 Thread Matt Kettler
Matthew Goodman wrote: A downgrade to SpamAssassin 3.2.3 returns functionality with per-user settings immediately. Any notes on what handle_user does and whether this is a new function of 3.2.4? It's not new. In fact, it was introduced into spamd somewhere between SA 1.3 (October 2001) and

RE: Problem with handle_user

2008-01-13 Thread Matthew Goodman
Well that certainly does address the origin of the handle_user functions. I reviewed the link you sent regarding the previous bug but I have to be honest when I say it doesn't shed any light on the situation whatsoever. The last guy that had the problem on the mailing list stopped posting after

Re: Googlepages Livefilestore spams

2008-01-13 Thread Chip M.
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Mike Cisar wrote: However, these last bunch seem to have a trick, the only other text in the message aside from the URL seems to be a date string. Somehow that must totally be screwing with Bayes since those messages are also triggering BAYES_00 or BAYES_02 and pretty much

Re: Problem with handle_user

2008-01-13 Thread Loren Wilton
A bug report would seem like a reasonable thing to me. Loren - Original Message - From: Matthew Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 7:40 PM Subject: RE: Problem with handle_user Well that certainly does address the origin