Hi,
Those files are effectively, white and black lists for the Phising
detection feature of MailScanner. I have never heard of anyone using
them to add scores to spam.
Your best best, might be to ask on the MailScanner mailing list, where
the author regularly contributes. He would be able
Some of our IP address blocks are in some RBL list just because we use those
IPs for ADSL and that is normal. For example in SORBS Dynamic IP Space (LAN,
Cable, DSL Dial Ups) – SORBS DUHL.
We need some way to exclude in testing our IP addresses from SORBS DUHL but
not from other SORBS lists. Is
I have question about one list from MailScanner. It is list at
http://www.mailscanner.info/phishing.safe.sites.conf.master and here is part
of text from it:
This file contains the list of all the sites which can be safely ignored in
the phishing fraud checks.
My question can it be used by
yes, this is easily done -- look up trusted_networks and
internal_networks settings.
--j.
giga328 writes:
Some of our IP address blocks are in some RBL list just because we use those
IPs for ADSL and that is normal. For example in SORBS Dynamic IP Space (LAN,
Cable, DSL Dial Ups) â
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
Looking at my stats I see those hitting LONGWORDS and scoring BAYES_50
or higher are all big time spam that have been hard to catch, see my
posts earlier this week 'bayes and celeb spam'. Would it be a bad idea
to add to the score when both hit? It looks like a score of
Hi Anthony,
I will ask people from MailScanner also but for my email system is not
possible to use MailScanner directly so I'm using spamd. My question is
about lowering chances for false positives by having safe list from
MailScanner. But since I just started to use SpamAssassing I'm asking is
I would like to split SpamAssassin test in two parts:
a) all test except in b) ;)
b) several expensive test which can not produce negative score
If after doing tests in a) score is greater than needed I would like to stop
scanning with spam result. If score is not big enough I would like that
Hi Justin,
Thank you for that. I'm back to Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf to take that lesson
again ;)
Regard,
Giga
Justin Mason wrote:
yes, this is easily done -- look up trusted_networks and
internal_networks settings.
--j.
--
View this message in context:
giga328 wrote:
I would like to split SpamAssassin test in two parts:
a) all test except in b) ;)
b) several expensive test which can not produce negative score
If after doing tests in a) score is greater than needed I would like to stop
scanning with spam result. If score is not big enough I
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Justin Mason wrote:
quick survey:
Is anyone using mass-check without previously having SVN set up?
Is this turning out to be a major barrier?
Should we put mass-check back into the distro?
I needed to use mass-check a few months ago and could not find it where the
wiki
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 05:53:57PM -0500, Kris Deugau wrote:
No, SA doesn't know how to split up messages for scanning; sa-learn is
the only SA component that can extract messages from an mbox mail folder.
On 31.01.08 19:23, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
Huh? SA, and spamassassin specifically,
Hi,
I wasn't suggesting that you used MailScanner, I was merely pointing out
that these lists are very specifically created and used for a feature of
MailScanner that has nothing to do with SPAM detection, ie the Phising
Detection feature.
Because of that you will need to know what the
On 01.02.08 03:23, giga328 wrote:
Some of our IP address blocks are in some RBL list just because we use those
IPs for ADSL and that is normal. For example in SORBS Dynamic IP Space (LAN,
Cable, DSL Dial Ups) – SORBS DUHL.
We need some way to exclude in testing our IP addresses from SORBS
--On Friday, February 1, 2008 3:10 -0800 giga328 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have question about one list from MailScanner. It is list at
http://www.mailscanner.info/phishing.safe.sites.conf.master and here is
part of text from it:
This file contains the list of all the sites which can be
Martin Gregorie wrote:
I'd got that message for SA's normal operation and have looked at the
innards of spamc closely enough to see that can only handle a single
message at a time. As I said above, it was the --mbox option that
confused me because, in general, an mbox file contains multiple
U. What do you mean by keep the two streams separate? SA
processes what's handed to it, one message at a time; the only reason I
could see trying to separate things is if running your archive through
SA would bog down the server enough to impact regular mail flow. The
processed
anyone looked at x-cr-hashedpuzzle?
(its the strange, 'hash cash', 'postage stamp' that Outlook 11+ adds to
emails it thinks might be blocked as spam)
What about a plugin to decode, score, validate it?
What about calculating it on outbound emails?
Would that require a license from Microsoft
Sorry if this is old hat. I've googled a lot, searched the archived mailing
list and read a lot of FAQs but have found nothing on this problem.
I have had a few spam emails recently that got straight through to my inbox.
On inspection the header shows
X-Spam-Status: No, score=
X-Spam-Score:
I ran several emails through SA with -D and search for RBL I find things like:
[2891] dbg: async: starting: URI-DNSBL,
DNSBL:multi.surbl.org.:worldchanging.com (timeout 15.0s, min 3.0s)
[2891] dbg: dns: URIBL_PH_SURBL lookup start
[2891] dbg: async: starting: URI-DNSBL,
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 09:23:26PM -, GQsm wrote:
I thought that every email that went through SA would receive a real number
score whether spam or not and under no instance should the score be
non-exsistent.
It depends how you have things setup, but if the mail gets to SA, then it
would
Michael Scheidell wrote:
anyone looked at x-cr-hashedpuzzle?
(its the strange, 'hash cash', 'postage stamp' that Outlook 11+ adds
to emails it thinks might be blocked as spam)
What about a plugin to decode, score, validate it?
What about calculating it on outbound emails?
Would that require
David Zinder wrote:
I ran several emails through SA with -D and search for RBL I find
things like:
[2891] dbg: async: starting: URI-DNSBL,
DNSBL:multi.surbl.org.:worldchanging.com (timeout 15.0s, min 3.0s)
[2891] dbg: dns: URIBL_PH_SURBL lookup start
[2891] dbg: async: starting: URI-DNSBL,
giga328 wrote:
Hi Anthony,
I will ask people from MailScanner also but for my email system is not
possible to use MailScanner directly so I'm using spamd. My question is
about lowering chances for false positives by having safe list from
MailScanner. But since I just started to use
Quoting mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
giga328 wrote:
Hi Anthony,
I will ask people from MailScanner also but for my email system is not
possible to use MailScanner directly so I'm using spamd. My question is
about lowering chances for false positives by having safe list from
MailScanner. But since
24 matches
Mail list logo
