Anyone ? Do you get the same analysis with the attached message that I
got ? Is my VBounce setup wrong then ?
Erik
(did my message get ignored because of the text attachment ?)
On May 12, 2008, at 11:32 AM, Erik Dasque wrote:
Hi all,
I am having trouble with VBounce. I think I followed
I checked the debug result of my a --lint and got:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ spamassassin 21 -D --lint | grep ounce
[13492] dbg: plugin: loading Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::VBounce from
@INC
[13492] dbg: config: fixed relative path: /var/lib/spamassassin/
Hi, Eric
2008/5/13 Erik Dasque [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I checked the debug result of my a --lint and got:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ spamassassin 21 -D --lint | grep ounce
[13492] dbg: plugin: loading Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::VBounce from @INC
[13492] dbg: config: fixed relative path:
On 12.05.08 21:49, Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
http://rafb.net/p/q3eZwd93.html
anyone can see any sense in it? it uses my hostname to fake a bounceback
that claims i sent a message to another faked address, while all doing
that from a dialup. what's the point of that? testing spambots?
On Sun, May 11, 2008 22:39, mouss wrote:
a +all and you are annoying us about forwarding and SPF?
On 12.05.08 23:07, Benny Pedersen wrote:
he, i have +all and forward nothing :)
it's not about what do you forward, it's about others forwarding your
e-mail (without rewriting mail from: which
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 15:17:29 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 12.05.08 21:49, Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
http://rafb.net/p/q3eZwd93.html
anyone can see any sense in it? it uses my hostname to fake a bounceback
that claims i sent a message to another faked address, while all doing
actually, the message simply isn't in a format known to the ruleset.
The problem is that it doesn't contain a bounced message at all...
just the bounce, and no copy of the original message.
Since there's no copy of the original, there's no way to tell what message
it was in reply to, and whether
On Mittwoch, 30. Mai 2007 Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
It's a nice ruleset but we had a major problem with it. RDJ pulled
in an update which contained these lines:
Sorry for that problem, and sorry for only answering now. I'd been busy
on some private problems, and hope to get into this list
Yup. Did you whitelist your servers? If you don't do it, SA doesn't
know how to tell a legit bounce from UBE-generated bounces.
You should have something like
whitelist_bounce_relays my.server.name other.server.name
in your local.cf.
True, and the OP did. He included another header
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 15:17:29 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 12.05.08 21:49, Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
http://rafb.net/p/q3eZwd93.html
anyone can see any sense in it? it uses my hostname to fake a bounceback
that claims i sent a message to another faked address, while all
My problem is that despite the fact that VBounce is enabled very few
of the backscatter gets trapped (5% ?).
Even messages that include the headers of the original message such as
the following don't get trapped (I thought VBounce was able to analyze
included headers to look for the SMTP
Karsten:
2008/5/13 Karsten Bräckelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yup. Did you whitelist your servers? If you don't do it, SA doesn't
know how to tell a legit bounce from UBE-generated bounces.
You should have something like
whitelist_bounce_relays my.server.name other.server.name
in
On Tue, 13 May 2008, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 15:17:29 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 12.05.08 21:49, Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
http://rafb.net/p/q3eZwd93.html
anyone can see any sense in it? it uses my hostname to fake a bounceback
that claims i sent a
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 16:51:50 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I've looked at it and I've (probably) missed it (again). Why do you think
that it pretends to look like backscatter, and why do you think it is not?
backscatter is what happens if mail systems automaticly reply to forged From:
I am using the spamassassin that is installed when you install
cPanel. I have been attempting to get the automatic bayes learning
to work. I have set use_bayes to 1 in my properties file but it
doesn't seem to be working. I say this because it appears that the
only time the bayes_toks file
Spamd is not using whitelist_from_rcvd or whitelist_from_spf in local.cf
but when i run a test msg spamassassin --test-mode 113.msg
orspamassassin -D 113.msg
The whitelist_from_rcvd and whitelist_from_spf are working
I've even tried setting the path. Here is how I'm launching spamd
Diego Pomatta escribió:
For more info on usage, etc --
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_TextCat.html
Make that
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_TextCat.html
for the 3.2.x version.
Diego Pomatta escribió:
Try adding
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::TextCat
to your /etc/mail/spamassassin/init.pre, to enable the TextCat plugin
Or better yet, edit your /etc/mail/spamassassin/v310.pre file and
uncomment #loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::TextCat
It's
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2008 22:39, mouss wrote:
a +all and you are annoying us about forwarding and SPF?
On 12.05.08 23:07, Benny Pedersen wrote:
he, i have +all and forward nothing :)
it's not about what do you forward, it's about others
On Tue, May 13, 2008 15:19, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Don't wonder if anyone will reject or flag your e-mail because havinr +all
in SPF
yes i need to implement srs to fix it better ?
come on, srs and +all it imho the same seen to the recipient
diff is that i dont use srs installed
Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 16:51:50 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I've looked at it and I've (probably) missed it (again). Why do you think
that it pretends to look like backscatter, and why do you think it is not?
backscatter is what happens if mail systems
On 13.05.08 15:17, Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
It's not backscatter. Please see read the message again, you'll see that
it actually _pretends_ to be backscatter. I'm just asking here becouse i
wondered why somone would do that.
I've looked at it and I've (probably) missed it (again). Why
I have a client that uses Spanish content and is getting filtered due
to some of the symbols used.
Is there anything in SpamAssasin that takes that into account?
Try adding
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::TextCat
to your /etc/mail/spamassassin/init.pre, to enable
Hello Guys,
i got a message that was flagged with MISSING_SUBJECT rule. The
message has, among other headers:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 17:12:47 -0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
and rules are:
header __HAS_SUBJECTexists:Subject
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 16:51:50 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I've looked at it and I've (probably) missed it (again). Why do you think
that it pretends to look like backscatter, and why do you think it is not?
On 13.05.08 19:09, Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
backscatter is what happens
On 13.05.08 10:59, Josie Walls wrote:
I have a client that uses Spanish content and is getting filtered due to
some of the symbols used.
what rules do those hit? Maybe you use some rules that have false positives
for non-english languages (chickenpox or so)
Is there anything in SpamAssasin
On Tue, May 13, 2008 15:19, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Don't wonder if anyone will reject or flag your e-mail because havinr +all
in SPF
On 13.05.08 21:29, Benny Pedersen wrote:
yes i need to implement srs to fix it better ?
no, forwarders need to.
come on, srs and +all it imho the
I'm using SpamAssassin 3.2.3 w/ Perl 5.8.8 on Linux. I'm not the sysadmin of
the machine, but a user.
I invoke it through a procmail recipe that says, in part,
:0fw
| /usr/bin/spamc
My user_prefs file is as follows.
report_safe 0
required_score 4.0
score BAYES_50 0.1
score BAYES_80 3.0
score
I'm not the sysadmin but a user on someone else's machine. This other
machine has SpamAssassin set up, and the VBounceRuleset module loaded, but
does not have the whitelist_bounce_relays line in local.cf that is needed to
make the rule function.
Would it function if I added that line to my
On Tue, May 13, 2008 23:09, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
spammers will use whatever they'll see people don't catch.
you just told all spammers to use mx +all in SPF records for their domains
to be able to use them for world-wide spamming
basic score in spf is olso very low pr default, one
Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote:
Hello Guys,
i got a message that was flagged with MISSING_SUBJECT rule. The
message has, among other headers:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 17:12:47 -0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
and rules are:
header
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 22:45:43 mouss wrote:
That said, one possibility is this: Some soho have an MSA on a dsl line.
a ratwared box inside (or a web service running on the MSA box) sends
mail to an invalid recipient. the MSA gets rejected and then sends you
an NDR. the MSA is borked
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 16:20 -0500, Robotech_Master wrote:
I'm not the sysadmin but a user on someone else's machine. This other
machine has SpamAssassin set up, and the VBounceRuleset module loaded,
but does not have the whitelist_bounce_relays line in local.cf that is
needed to make the rule
Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 22:45:43 mouss wrote:
That said, one possibility is this: Some soho have an MSA on a dsl line.
a ratwared box inside (or a web service running on the MSA box) sends
mail to an invalid recipient. the MSA gets rejected and then sends you
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 16:16 -0500, Robotech_Master wrote:
I'm using SpamAssassin 3.2.3 w/ Perl 5.8.8 on Linux. I'm not the
sysadmin of the machine, but a user.
I invoke it through a procmail recipe that says, in part,
:0fw
| /usr/bin/spamc
I am getting an immense amount of backscatter
Please keep list posts on list, by either Replying To List or All.
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 17:43 -0500, Robotech_Master wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, here goes my favorite quote these days:
$ grep -A 2
Mark Walmsley wrote:
Spamd is not using whitelist_from_rcvd or whitelist_from_spf in local.cf
but when i run a test msg
spamassassin --test-mode 113.msg
or
spamassassin -D 113.msg
The whitelist_from_rcvd and whitelist_from_spf are working
I've even tried setting the path. Here is how
Hello all,
since some longer time I have a little problem with the spam learning
method, which is used in a script on my box.
The script runs as user _amavisd, but it always tries to acces the root
folder.
This of course produces an error:
config: path /var/root/.spamassassin is inaccessible:
In my local.cf I have:
add_header all Spammy _SPAMMYTOKENS(2,long)_
add_header all Hammy _HAMMYTOKENS(2,long)_
which according to Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf should result in:
X-Spam-Spammy: 0.989-6--0h-4s--4d--remove.php, 0.988-33--2h-25s--1d--UD:jpg
however when running spamassassin -t
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 9:30 pm, Chris wrote:
In my local.cf I have:
add_header all Spammy _SPAMMYTOKENS(2,long)_
add_header all Hammy _HAMMYTOKENS(2,long)_
which according to Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf should result in:
X-Spam-Spammy: 0.989-6--0h-4s--4d--remove.php,
Hi all,
My installation of spamassassin seems to have stopped using all the
rules I have added when checking email. They now reside in
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.002002
I'm trying to run spamassassin -D --lint and output it to say test.txt
so that I can see it all later and try and trouble
Kathryn Kleinschafer wrote:
Hi all,
My installation of spamassassin seems to have stopped using all the
rules I have added when checking email. They now reside in
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.002002
I'm trying to run spamassassin -D --lint and output it to say test.txt
so that I can see it all
Awesome thanks.
the output showed
[3887] dbg: config: using /etc/mail/spamassassin for site rules pre files
[3887] dbg: config: read file /etc/mail/spamassassin/init.pre
[3887] dbg: config: read file /etc/mail/spamassassin/v310.pre
[3887] dbg: config: read file /etc/mail/spamassassin/v312.pre
Kathryn Kleinschafer wrote:
Awesome thanks.
the output showed
[3887] dbg: config: using /etc/mail/spamassassin for site rules pre
files
[3887] dbg: config: read file /etc/mail/spamassassin/init.pre
[3887] dbg: config: read file /etc/mail/spamassassin/v310.pre
[3887] dbg: config: read file
I am running it by going:
sudo -u postfix spamassassin -p
/etc/MailScanner/spam.assassin.prefs.conf -t messagename.mai
Matt Kettler wrote:
Kathryn Kleinschafer wrote:
Awesome thanks.
the output showed
[3887] dbg: config: using /etc/mail/spamassassin for site rules pre
files
[3887]
45 matches
Mail list logo
