dsbl has been down for a long long time now
Any more DNS checks is just waste of time
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 11:41 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Todd Adamson wrote:
Would I be correct or incorrect that this will get updated
to our rules through sa-update. If this does get corrected,
what
Updates are still at version 694708 for 3.2.5.
Cheers,
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Networks Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 September 2008 02:25
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: dsbl.org
On Thu, September 25, 2008 23:48, Dirk Bonengel wrote:
Important news for all users of the iXhash plugin and the corresponding
lists.
thanks for good plugin first, i like to know if it can be speed optimized
more then it is now, problem from the source code as i see it is that if
one use more
Typo in your example config:
bodyCTYME_IXHASH eval:ixhashtest('ctyme.ixhash.net')
describeCYTME_IXHASH iXhash found @ ctyme.ixhash.net
tflags CYTME_IXHASH net
# adjust score as you seem fit
score CYTME_IXHASH 0.1
CTYME and CYTME, oops.
Phil
--
Phil
Randal, Phil wrote:
Updates are still at version 694708 for 3.2.5.
Cheers,
Phil
Looks like something has gone awry then as I successfully updated this
morning (to 699147, see below), but as you say it's now reporting
version 694708:
[4349] dbg: channel: attempting channel
How do you call SpamAssasin?
I ask because some integration tools make their own markups, and only
use SA to generate a list of hits. In those tools, it doesn't matter
what you set rewrite_header to, SA will ignore you.
Have you tried rewrite_header at the local.cf level?
Have you run
Hey,
just out of curiosity i'd like to try what actually happens if you enter your
email address on some spam site that claims to send you money if you give them
your address. (do you receive a virus? a fake bank account? nothing?)
is there any public service which examines these sites?
--
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:31:45 +0200 (CEST)
Von: Benny Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Important info for iXhash users
On Thu, September 25, 2008 23:48, Dirk Bonengel wrote:
Important news for all users of
Ned Slider writes:
Looks like something has gone awry then as I successfully updated this
morning (to 699147, see below), but as you say it's now reporting
version 694708:
[4349] dbg: channel: attempting channel updates.spamassassin.org
[4349] dbg: channel: update directory
If dsbl has been down for awhile, since around June, why
hasn't it been removed from the configuration via sa-update
before now? That's one of the purposes of sa-update.
Todd
ram wrote:
dsbl has been down for a long long time now
Any more DNS checks is just waste of time
On Thu,
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 09:38 -0500, Todd Adamson wrote:
If dsbl has been down for awhile, since around June, why
hasn't it been removed from the configuration via sa-update
before now? That's one of the purposes of sa-update.
Because nobody complained about it and opened a bug.
It was
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, slaterm61 wrote:
Each users spam preferences are stored in a mysql table and everything
is working pretty well, except that people with the required_score
option set to a high level.. e.g 99 are still having spam filtered with
the option in .procmailrc * ^X-Spam-Level:
Hi!
If dsbl has been down for awhile, since around June, why hasn't it been
removed from the configuration via sa-update before now? That's one of the
purposes of sa-update.
Yeah ... i would file a complaint with your local sales droid. ;)
I guess since nobody bothered to open a ticket
Hi,
I follow spamassassin by svn. I just tried updating, and after
sucessfully updating files in lib/Mail/SpamAssassin and rules/ I get:
Fetching external item into 'rulesrc'
svn: SSL is not supported
Something has changed.
David
I'm using a domain hosting service that uses exim for mail. I have little
control other than through user_prefs file and can't change the local.cf file.
In fact, I can't even find it when I look in /etc.
spamassassin --lint:
[12158] warn: config: could not find site rules directory
check: no
David Ronis writes:
Hi,
I follow spamassassin by svn. I just tried updating, and after
sucessfully updating files in lib/Mail/SpamAssassin and rules/ I get:
Fetching external item into 'rulesrc'
svn: SSL is not supported
Something has changed.
nope; something has changed in your
Some common configurations of Exim are set up such that Exim does
*NOT* use the message as provided by Spamassassin. It gives SA a
*copy* of the message, then puts the SA headers from the copy into the
main message. This has the effect of ignoring any SA-modified headers,
like the subject.
So, it basically boils down to my lack of knowledge that
dsbl died back in June, and was used from within
spamassassin. I'll admit it. I didn't know about it. My fault.
Todd
Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Hi!
If dsbl has been down for awhile, since around June, why hasn't it
been removed from
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 03:04:56PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
Kelsey, Theo, can you check and see why your secondaries aren't picking up
the zone change on updates.spamassassin.org? cheers,
Grrr. I really need to fix this stupid bind package:
Sep 26 11:31:05 eclectic named[29926]: dumping
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 10:44 -0500, Todd Adamson wrote:
So, it basically boils down to my lack of knowledge that
dsbl died back in June, and was used from within
spamassassin. I'll admit it. I didn't know about it. My fault.
No, it boils down to the attitude in your e-mail - Why didn't the
I've just successfully sa-updated.
Thanks guys.
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Networks Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 September 2008 15:05
To: Ned Slider
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
I think using procmail might be the best solution, giving me more control
without having to go through support at the hosting company.
--- On Fri, 9/26/08, Jake Maul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some common configurations of Exim are set up such that Exim does
*NOT* use the message as provided by
No, it boils down to the attitude in your e-mail - Why didn't the
SpamAssassin benefactors do their job better. I for one am impressed
with their willingness to provide such a useful piece of software, and
maintain it. But most of them have real jobs, and don't spend every
waking moment
Hi!
When people design and build a system(s) of any type, there should be checks
and balances designed in that can check and see if sub parts of the systems
(or called by the system(s)) are broken or disappeared or what have you so
that allowances / changes can be made in a quicker, more
Visionary people can read messages, many RBL servers have announce lists.
So go ahead and report of file a bug whenever needed :-)
Bye,
Raymond.
So what is your point Raymond?
That we are end users should find out every external subsystem call and
document it and search for and get on
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 10:35 -0700, RobertH wrote:
No, it boils down to the attitude in your e-mail - Why didn't the
SpamAssassin benefactors do their job better. I for one am impressed
with their willingness to provide such a useful piece of software, and
maintain it. But most of
They run a bunch of tests every night, and are notified by nagios if the
tests fail. lurk on the -dev mail list every now and again and you'll
see it.
--
Daniel J McDonald,
Thanks Dan
I know some and figured some of the rest.
Yeah, I went to the dsbl website some time back and
On Fri, September 26, 2008 15:51, Dirk Bonengel wrote:
There will be a new version that caches the hashes, so that will be taken
care of. Just gimme a few more days
super duper
--
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
McDonald, Dan wrote:
No, it boils down to the attitude in your e-mail - Why didn't the
SpamAssassin benefactors do their job better. I for one am impressed
with their willingness to provide such a useful piece of software, and
maintain it. But most of them have real jobs, and don't spend
I've changed the ixhash.cf per Dirk's instructions, the whole error is:
[15617] warn: rules: failed to run CYTME_IXHASH test, skipping:
[15617] warn: (Can't locate object method check_ixhash via package
Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus at (eval 1500) line 1450.
[15617] warn: )
Realize it's a
Chris wrote:
I've changed the ixhash.cf per Dirk's instructions, the whole error is:
[15617] warn: rules: failed to run CYTME_IXHASH test, skipping:
[15617] warn: (Can't locate object method check_ixhash via package
Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus at (eval 1500) line 1450.
[15617] warn:
On 26/09/2008 2:03 PM, McDonald, Dan wrote:
someone noticed and mentioned it on the user list. another person saw
that and filed a bug. Then one of the developers made the change,
pushed out the update, and closed the bug. I don't see that there is
any crisis here that needs to be solved.
On 26/09/2008 11:44 AM, Todd Adamson wrote:
So, it basically boils down to my lack of knowledge that dsbl died back
in June, and was used from within spamassassin. I'll admit it. I didn't
know about it. My fault.
No problem. We didn't know either. It wasn't causing any problems so
there's
33 matches
Mail list logo
