Hallo Karsten,
Am 2008-10-08 16:23:15, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
Suffering from a backscatter wave, and haven't even got sufficient
caffeine. Your email was quarantined due to an unauthorized Cyrillic
Language Character Set. Yeah, right...
You have gotten tonns of MAILER-DAEMON messages in
On 10/11/2008 12:43 AM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:15:00AM +0200, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
74.714 78.1593 1.11300.986 0.780.00 URIBL_BLACK
Would you pls post those FP URIs so ppl can judge what your rating is
based upon.
(imperfect) command posted for my
Benedict Verheyen wrote:
snip
Hi,
thanks Mark and Guenther.
I patched the score part as indicated in Mark's mail and when i run
spamassassin in
debug mode, i do see a message popping up with results to a NaN score:
[6443] warn: rules: score 'nan' for rule 'AWL' in 'AWL: '
Benedict Verheyen wrote:
snip
I got a message that again scored a nan for MSOE_MID_WRONG_CASE
The mail is available here:
http://paste-it.net/public/r3df8b2/
Weird thing is that the lines i added to PerMsgStatus.pm weren't showing up.
Regards,
Benedict
My bad, i reinstalled
On 10/13/2008 11:27 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
On Friday, October 10, 2008, 11:29:33 PM, Yet Ninja wrote:
Something tells me your stats are either obsolete, biased, borked or
your ham corpus would be quite a few other ppl's mainsleaze spam corpus.
Imo, that 1.1% FP rating seems to have little
Hi *;
Am 2008-10-08 18:53:00, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 17:39 +0200, mouss wrote:
I am learning foreign languages. it would be nice if backscatterers
change the bounce text so that I learn more :-{
DIES IST NUR EINE WARNUNG.
I send such crap directly back if
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 03:29:57PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Hello,
so the spammers got it. my required_score is 3.5 (the same as for BAYES_99)
Pretty low. But I guess it's ok if you only tag.
and SPF_PASS is -0.001. So, even clear spam (I haven't seen FP for BAYES_99
for a LONG
util_rb_2tld proboards.com
(does magic)
On 10/10/2008 11:19 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
This has come up on the list before, but... Looking at my most recent
network run:
OVERALLSPAM% HAM% S/ORANK SCORE NAME
0 460740215640.955 0.000.00 (all messages)
0.0 95.5290 4.47100.955 0.00
Hi,
I have ClamAVPlugin/Spammassassin working just fine but need to alert mail
admin that a mail has a potential virus (as I don't dump suspected mail ..
all reviewed by a mail admin), the header has the 'X-Spam-Virus: Yes' field
but I want to display [***Virus***] in the subject of the mail
Is Pyzor worth running these days?
Is it still effective?
Can anyone using it comment on it?
Thanks,
William
Benedict,
Thing is, what is causing the nan?
My guess is that a NaN somehow got into your AWL database.
I have reopened bug 3364, and attached a richer patch:
Deal with NaN in AutoWhitelist and PerMsgStatus
which includes my previous patch and also instruments
AutoWhitelist module to check
Guenther wrote:
Do you use customized headers? (Sorry, don't have the OP, but IIRC I
spotted some.) What are the results of the snippets in comment 4, and
what about comment 11?
A question is for Benedict I suppose.
Puzzling, how he gets NaN in the first place. Benedict, did you
Here are some stats for this past weekend comparing Pyzor to other hash
tests:
36 CTYME_IXHASH
38 HOSTEUROPE_IXHASH
92 GENERIC_IXHASH
129 NIXSPAM_IXHASH
218 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100
256 PYZOR_CHECK
388 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100
411 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100
Forgot to include Karmasphere:
160 KARMA_CONTENT_NEGATIVE
210 KARMA_CONNECT_NEGATIVE
Bill
Bill Landry wrote:
Here are some stats for this past weekend comparing Pyzor to other hash
tests:
36 CTYME_IXHASH
38 HOSTEUROPE_IXHASH
92 GENERIC_IXHASH
129
Hello,
so the spammers got it. my required_score is 3.5 (the same as for BAYES_99)
and SPF_PASS is -0.001. So, even clear spam (I haven't seen FP for BAYES_99
for a LONG LONG time) is passed because of SPF (which teoretically should
not happen.
Now I have a question: Should I zero score of
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 08:44:08AM -0700, Bill Landry wrote:
Here are some stats for this past weekend comparing Pyzor to other hash
tests:
36 CTYME_IXHASH
38 HOSTEUROPE_IXHASH
92 GENERIC_IXHASH
129 NIXSPAM_IXHASH
218 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100
256 PYZOR_CHECK
On Friday, October 10, 2008, 11:29:33 PM, Yet Ninja wrote:
Something tells me your stats are either obsolete, biased, borked or
your ham corpus would be quite a few other ppl's mainsleaze spam corpus.
Imo, that 1.1% FP rating seems to have little value in a global context.
thx for the
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here are some stats for this past weekend comparing Pyzor to other hash
tests:
36 CTYME_IXHASH
38 HOSTEUROPE_IXHASH
92 GENERIC_IXHASH
129 NIXSPAM_IXHASH
218 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100
256 PYZOR_CHECK
Michelle Konzack a écrit :
Hi *;
Am 2008-10-08 18:53:00, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 17:39 +0200, mouss wrote:
I am learning foreign languages. it would be nice if backscatterers
change the bounce text so that I learn more :-{
DIES IST NUR EINE WARNUNG.
On Mon, October 13, 2008 16:39, Henrik K wrote:
meta SPF_PASS (SPF_PASS !BAYES_99)
Obviously you can't redefine SPF_PASS on the fly.
olso that SPF_PASS was newer meant to let any msg throught it was just a
pointer that SPF is not fail
recipient still need to add sender into local.cf /
On Mon, October 13, 2008 17:25, William Taylor wrote:
Is Pyzor worth running these days?
Is it still effective?
Can anyone using it comment on it?
its still working here, my own problem is to have it autolearn in good
way, but it newer hits wroung on ham / spam here, running my own pyzord :)
On Mon, October 13, 2008 17:44, Bill Landry wrote:
The only downside to Pyzor is that it requires python rather than perl.
Otherwise, it certainly helps here.
it gets the job done :)
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216374
any helpers welcome
--
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ?
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 17:39 +0200, Mark Martinec wrote:
Thing is, what is causing the nan?
My guess is that a NaN somehow got into your AWL database.
Things are much more complicated, or rather weird, than that.
According to Benedict's reports and pasted snippets, he got an NaN score
for
Guenther, Benedict,
My guess is that a NaN somehow got into your AWL database.
Things are much more complicated, or rather weird, than that.
According to Benedict's reports and pasted snippets, he got an NaN score
for at least 3 rules: FROM_ILLEGAL_CHARS, AWL, MSOE_MID_WRONG_CASE
You are
25 matches
Mail list logo
