Jeff Chan wrote ... (11/11/2008 7:33 PM):
Hi Micah,
Thanks very much for the feedback. Does anyone know how many
non-profits have more than 1,000 users (i.e., users with
mailboxes)? The non-profit pricing is below ISPs and half that
of regular end users.
There are many non-profits out
Dear Karsten.
Karsten Bräckelmann schrieb:
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 21:55 +0100, Thomas Zastrow wrote:
I'm still not happy with my Spamassassin ... it don't recognizes a lot
of Spam mails, even my Thunderbird with default properties recognizes
more than SA.
Every day, I train the Bayes filter
On 12/11/2008 at 1:15 PM Henrik K wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 04:33:50PM -0800, Jeff Chan wrote:
Hi Micah,
Thanks very much for the feedback. Does anyone know how many
non-profits have more than 1,000 users (i.e., users with
mailboxes)? The non-profit pricing is below ISPs and half
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Justin Mason wrote:
John Hardin writes:
Check out the sought-fraud ruleset.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/rules/trunk/sandbox/jm/20_sought_fraud.cf
(I don't know if it's in sa-update yet - Justin?)
That's in sa-update since last night; it's now bundled in
At 16:58 11-11-2008, Dave Koontz wrote:
Given this change in SURBL in policy and pricing, I would strongly
suggest removing their rules from the SA rule base. Otherwise, you will
likely get lots of complaints from users of systems that have embedded
SA installs, or others who do not monitor
Found this posted on another list, thought others here might find this
of interest, as well.
Major Source of Online Scams and Spams Knocked Offline:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2008/11/major_source_of_online_scams_a.html
SpamCop.net - Total spam report volume:
Hi this mail ius just to say thanks all the people kindly sent me a
mail trying to figure out the low performance in my server.
Right now the server is working well and filtering like I wish. The
changes I did were decrease the number of amavisd processes to 5,
turned off DCC, the
SpamCop.net - Total spam report volume:
http://www.spamcop.net/spamgraph.shtml?spamweek
I first thought my stats are broken, but it seems they are still working
as they did before - note the share-price-like drop beginning sometime
after 22:00 UTC yesterday.
(These mrtg charts are not mail
On 11/11/2008 at 7:58 PM Dave Koontz wrote:
There are many non-profits out there that will hit your limits... I
don't think anyone knows how many there are. 1,000 users is fairly
trivial, and most non profits won't even be able to fill in your forms
second required field of how many messages on
What about spamassassin -D --lint?
btw I suspect this is from having 2 versions of SpamAssassin installed,
and/or 2 versions of perl, colliding with each other.
--j.
Michael Monnerie writes:
On Mittwoch, 12. November 2008 Justin Mason wrote:
Are you using the sought ruleset? I updated
On 12.11.08 21:56, Peter Nitschke wrote:
Read the entire sentence.
Please note that free public DNS queries for organizations smaller
than 1,000 users or processing fewer than 250,000 messages per
day is unchanged.
So you could have 1,000,000 users but less than 250,000 messages per
* Justin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-12 05:20-0500]:
John Hardin writes:
On Sun, 9 Nov 2008, Micah Anderson wrote:
Does anyone have any rules to catch these, or suggestions of scores to
tweak to make these hit better? I am running clamav-milter with the
sanesecurity add-ons,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 07:58:01PM -0500, Dave Koontz wrote:
Given this change in SURBL in policy and pricing, I would strongly
suggest removing their rules from the SA rule base. Otherwise, you will
likely get lots of complaints from users of systems that have embedded
SA installs, or
Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Micah Anderson wrote:
I set some 'add_header' options in my global local.cf and could not
figure out why they were not being applied. It turns out that because I
am using SQL user_prefs, any add_header lines I put in local.cf are just
ignored (even
On 12.11.08 13:00, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
In another mail to surbl list it was mentioned that any organization who has
more than 1000 users or processes 25 messages per day, the feed must
be set up and charge paid.
That meant you need to have =1000 users AND process =25
On Wednesday, November 12, 2008, 2:33:53 AM, Peter Nitschke wrote:
On 11/11/2008 at 7:58 PM Dave Koontz wrote:
There are many non-profits out there that will hit your limits... I
don't think anyone knows how many there are. 1,000 users is fairly
trivial, and most non profits won't even be able
Without changing anything my sa-update suddenly fails badly. Can someone
give me a hint?
Subroutine check_for_from_dns redefined at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/EvalTests.pm line
1429.
plugin: failed to parse plugin (from @INC): Bareword
Micah Anderson writes:
* Justin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-12 05:20-0500]:
John Hardin writes:
On Sun, 9 Nov 2008, Micah Anderson wrote:
Does anyone have any rules to catch these, or suggestions of scores to
tweak to make these hit better? I am running clamav-milter
On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 12:24 +0100, Thomas Zastrow wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann schrieb:
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 21:55 +0100, Thomas Zastrow wrote:
I'm still not happy with my Spamassassin ... it don't recognizes a lot
of Spam mails, even my Thunderbird with default properties recognizes
Jeff Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know how many non-profits have more than 1,000 users
(i.e., users with mailboxes)?
Most universities and colleges have many more than that. An
undergrad-only school that admits only about 200 a year would
pass that number, counting faculty
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 04:33:50PM -0800, Jeff Chan wrote:
Hi Micah,
Thanks very much for the feedback. Does anyone know how many
non-profits have more than 1,000 users (i.e., users with
mailboxes)? The non-profit pricing is below ISPs and half that
of regular end users.
Sometimes the
Hi!
Given this change in SURBL in policy and pricing, I would strongly
suggest removing their rules from the SA rule base. Otherwise, you will
likely get lots of complaints from users of systems that have embedded
SA installs, or others who do not monitor this list. I can see many
Barracuda
On Mittwoch, 12. November 2008 Justin Mason wrote:
Are you using the sought ruleset? I updated that last night to
bundle the new anti-fraud component. However it all looks fine and
I can't see a bug that would cause those errors...
Oh, my first mail to the list arrived, so I seem to not get
Sujit Acharyya-Choudhury wrote:
I would like to use the free barracuda RBL with SpamAssassin. Is
there any rule for that yet?
I've been usingthis:
ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DNSEval
header RCVD_IN_BRBL eval:check_rbl('brbl-lastexternal',
'bb.barracudacentral.org.')
John Hardin writes:
On Sun, 9 Nov 2008, Micah Anderson wrote:
Does anyone have any rules to catch these, or suggestions of scores to
tweak to make these hit better? I am running clamav-milter with the
sanesecurity add-ons, but these are still making it through.
Check out the
On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 13:00 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 12.11.08 21:56, Peter Nitschke wrote:
Read the entire sentence.
Please note that free public DNS queries for organizations smaller
than 1,000 users or processing fewer than 250,000 messages per
day is unchanged.
Where is the price list? I haven't been able to find it.
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Brennan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 12:25 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: SURBL Usage Policy change
Jeff Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Monnerie writes:
Without changing anything my sa-update suddenly fails badly. Can someone give
me a hint?
Are you using the sought ruleset? I updated that last night to bundle
the new anti-fraud component. However it all looks fine and I can't
see a bug that would cause those
On 12.11.08 11:24, Michael Monnerie wrote:
Without changing anything my sa-update suddenly fails badly. Can someone
give me a hint?
HAven't you changed or upgraded perl or any of its libraries?
Subroutine check_for_from_dns redefined at
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 09:56:46PM +1030, Peter Nitschke wrote:
Read the entire sentence.
Please note that free public DNS queries for organizations smaller
than 1,000 users or processing fewer than 250,000 messages per
day is unchanged.
So you could have 1,000,000 users but less than
On Wednesday, November 12, 2008, 10:55:52 AM, Larry Rosenbaum wrote:
Where is the price list? I haven't been able to find it.
Hi Larry,
The pricing calculator is the first step of the data feed form:
http://www.surbl.org/datafeed/
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday, November 12, 2008, 3:15:26 AM, Henrik K wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 04:33:50PM -0800, Jeff Chan wrote:
Hi Micah,
Thanks very much for the feedback. Does anyone know how many
non-profits have more than 1,000 users (i.e., users with
mailboxes)? The non-profit pricing is
Hello All,
Can anyone provide insight into what this means and how to rectify it?:
2.9 TVD_SPACE_RATIO BODY: TVD_SPACE_RATIO
Thanks so much for your help.
Kindest Regards,
Josie
Josie Walls
Senior Email Deliverability Manager
WhatCounts, Inc.
Business Email, RSS, Mobile,
Josie Walls wrote:
Hello All,
Can anyone provide insight into what this means and how to rectify it?:
2.9 TVD_SPACE_RATIO BODY: TVD_SPACE_RATIO
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Rules/TVD_SPACE_RATIO
On Wednesday, November 12, 2008 1:28 PM +0100 Matthias Leisi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Number of users or number of messages is a good approximation of the
number of actual DNS queries, and sufficiently simple to determine.
At dnswl.org, we consider any source (being losely defined as a /24
A bit confused after reading all the mail. Would the following rule
score 2.0 points and reduce FP?
ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DNSEval
header __RCVD_IN_BRBL eval:check_rbl('brbl','bb.barracudacentral.org')
tflags __RCVD_IN_BRBL net
header RCVD_IN_BRBL
On Tuesday, November 11, 2008, 4:58:01 PM, Dave Koontz wrote:
Jeff Chan wrote ... (11/11/2008 7:33 PM):
Hi Micah,
Thanks very much for the feedback. Does anyone know how many
non-profits have more than 1,000 users (i.e., users with
mailboxes)? The non-profit pricing is below ISPs and half
Kenneth Porter schrieb:
At dnswl.org, we consider any source (being losely defined as a /24 doing
more than 100'000 queries / 24 hours as a large user, and ask them to
switch to rsync access (however this is not strongly enforced at present,
and does not involve money).
Does it help to
Lately, we've been getting a bunch of spam with negative scores because it
has triggered USER_IN_WHITELIST but we don't use whitelist_from*. About 2
weeks ago I removed whitelist_from_rcvd. Could it still be triggering it.
Maybe the spam was sent a few weeks ago and just now being deliver to the
On Mittwoch, 12. November 2008 Justin Mason wrote:
Are you using the sought ruleset? I updated that last night to
bundle the new anti-fraud component. However it all looks fine and
I can't see a bug that would cause those errors...
I've got confirmation that I have been re-subscribed now.
I don't understand what users have to do in this context. It's the queries
that affect DNS servers.
It's obviously true that the number of queries is the cause for
introducing any limitation/pricing scheme. But it's pretty hard for a
receiving site to actually know how many DNS queries they're
Nevermind. Someone has whitelisted our url in user-prefs.
robanna wrote:
Lately, we've been getting a bunch of spam with negative scores because it
has triggered USER_IN_WHITELIST but we don't use whitelist_from*. About 2
weeks ago I removed whitelist_from_rcvd. Could it still be
Hello Everyone,
I am wondering, what happens to E-Mail that is being scanned when the
root user on the mail system restarts Spamassassin? I see lots of Spamd
children before it is restarted and they suddenly all drop off on a
restart (as expected) - do the E-Mail's being scanned at that time
No... I'd say if it's working for you, then no worries. I'll have to try
installing it again when I have a chance. Perhaps it matters what kind
of compiler you use for installing too...
Bret
On 11/10/2008 6:04 AM, Dan Barker wrote:
I read it on the internet (so it has to be trueg) that
I seen the similar statistics on my mail server. I saw a drop of spam
since this morning which I normally see the daily spike of spam. I
wish this lull in spam will last awhile since my mail server needs a
break :-)
Frank
SpamCop.net - Total spam report volume:
SpamCop.net - Total spam report volume:
http://www.spamcop.net/spamgraph.shtml?spamweek
I first thought my stats are broken, but it seems they are still working
as they did before - note the share-price-like drop beginning sometime
after 22:00 UTC yesterday.
can't see any drop here. in
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Luis Croker wrote:
turned off DCC, the network tests and install the DNS service
locallly.
Turning off the network tests will obscure any benefit from installing a
local caching DNS server. Try turning the network tests on for a while and
see whether your performance
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 01:16 +0100, Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
why would all spam come from a single network anyway?
Turning off that one network would stop spam from a bot net if the
bot-herder's command server(s) are there.
Martin
Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 01:16 +0100, Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
why would all spam come from a single network anyway?
Turning off that one network would stop spam from a bot net if the
bot-herder's command server(s) are there.
Martin
SpamCop's weekly graph
fchan schrieb:
I seen the similar statistics on my mail server. I saw a drop of spam
since this morning which I normally see the daily spike of spam. I wish
this lull in spam will last awhile since my mail server needs a break :-)
Frank
SpamCop.net - Total spam report volume:
On Donnerstag, 13. November 2008 Michael Monnerie wrote:
Without changing anything
Bah, found the bug, it was a PEBKAC. Some stupid installed SA 3.1.8 from
the openSUSE DVD, while we were at 3.2.5.
Reverted to 3.2.5, runs smooth as it should. Sorry for the fuzz.
mfg zmi
--
// Michael
On 12/11/2008 at 12:45 PM Jeff Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, November 12, 2008, 3:15:26 AM, Henrik K wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 04:33:50PM -0800, Jeff Chan wrote:
Hi Micah,
Thanks very much for the feedback. Does anyone know how many
non-profits have more than 1,000 users (i.e., users with
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, cyrilla johnson wrote:
Dearest One, I'm Ms Cyrilla Johnson, Pls I'm seeking for your attention
to assist me in transfering sum of (US$10.5) to you. It's Deposited in a
security company here in Cote d'ivoire by My late father but my uncle is
a total trait to my life. More
Hi Michael,
At 14:45 12-11-2008, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
I am wondering, what happens to E-Mail that is
being scanned when the root user on the mail
system restarts Spamassassin? I see lots of
Spamd children before it is restarted and they
suddenly all drop off on a restart (as expected)
54 matches
Mail list logo
