is there anything wrong with still using an older pre 1.5.x version of
iXhash?
is there a problem that makes an upgrade recommended?
OR
is there a problem that forces up to upgrade?
- rh
Kelly Jones wrote:
> I want to run a message through ONE SpamAssassin test w/o the overhead
> of running all the tests.
>
> I realize many SA tests are just regexs (so I could use procmail or
> something), but this test is a meta test and it may change from time
> to time.
>
> Does SA have a "--run
On Wednesday 03 December 2008 7:01 pm, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I was using Pyzor until about 2 months ago. It was quite good then, I
> don't think I ever got a False Positive with it, and it did stop a lot
> of Spam - not as much as Razor, but still significant. I had to take it
>
On 03/12/2008 9:06 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>>> Darly posted a very similar rule to this a while ago, triggering on the
>>> strange cid- prefix in the live spaces URI. You can use that just as
>>> well.
>> Thanks I will give that rule a shot and check out the earlier post by Darly.
>
> Whoop
> > Darly posted a very similar rule to this a while ago, triggering on the
> > strange cid- prefix in the live spaces URI. You can use that just as
> > well.
>
> Thanks I will give that rule a shot and check out the earlier post by Darly.
Whoops. :) Daryl C. W. O'Shea I mean... Sorry Daryl. Wo
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 02:26 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 13:48 +1300, Kate wrote:
> > Yeah have been getting lots of variations of:
> > http://www.pastebin.ca/1275436
> > Quite a lot are getting caught but in saying that alot are still getting
> > through.
>
> That
mouss wrote:
Lists a écrit :
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Thank you for the information I will attempt to get it up an running,
have had a huge increase in spam last week or so and just trying to
get it under control.
What type of *spam* are you referring to that you want t
I want to run a message through ONE SpamAssassin test w/o the overhead
of running all the tests.
I realize many SA tests are just regexs (so I could use procmail or
something), but this test is a meta test and it may change from time
to time.
Does SA have a "--run-just-this-test=FOO" option?
--
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 13:48 +1300, Lists wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
What type of *spam* are you referring to that you want to kill by
throwing anti-virus signatures at them? Are all of them phishing or
scam?
Hey, you said spam. We might be back on
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 13:48 +1300, Lists wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > What type of *spam* are you referring to that you want to kill by
> > throwing anti-virus signatures at them? Are all of them phishing or
> > scam?
> >
> > Hey, you said spam. We might be back on-topic, however gray!
mouss wrote:
> Matt Kettler a écrit :
>
>> mouss wrote:
>>
>>> Matt Kettler a écrit :
>>>
>>>
Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> If I get a spam and I need to have SA learn that it's spam with
> sa-learn, wouldn't it be useful to also skew the AWL for t
Lists a écrit :
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>>> Thank you for the information I will attempt to get it up an running,
>>> have had a huge increase in spam last week or so and just trying to
>>> get it under control.
>>>
>>
>> What type of *spam* are you referring to that you want to kill by
>
Matt Kettler a écrit :
> mouss wrote:
>> Matt Kettler a écrit :
>>
>>> Brian J. Murrell wrote:
>>>
If I get a spam and I need to have SA learn that it's spam with
sa-learn, wouldn't it be useful to also skew the AWL for that sender so
that future uses of the AWL for that spam
> -Original Message-
> From: Niels Przybilla [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 3 December 2008 6:01 p.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: bohunu
>
> Hi,
>
> is somebody here using bohunu.com
>
> Is it worth testing it ?
>
> BR Niels
Hello,
I was using Pyzor until about
Michael,
> I am completing some testing on new altermime version 0.3.10 for freebsd
> (it has already been submitted to ports)
>
> If you remember, using dkim signing and altermime would add \r\n to
> emails if you added disclaimers.
> (i have separate plain text and html disclaimers)
Actually j
mouss wrote:
> Matt Kettler a écrit :
>
>> Brian J. Murrell wrote:
>>
>>> If I get a spam and I need to have SA learn that it's spam with
>>> sa-learn, wouldn't it be useful to also skew the AWL for that sender so
>>> that future uses of the AWL for that spammer will push the overall spam
>
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Thank you for the information I will attempt to get it up an running,
have had a huge increase in spam last week or so and just trying to
get it under control.
What type of *spam* are you referring to that you want to kill by
throwing anti-virus signatures at th
> Thank you for the information I will attempt to get it up an running,
> have had a huge increase in spam last week or so and just trying to get
> it under control.
What type of *spam* are you referring to that you want to kill by
throwing anti-virus signatures at them? Are all of them phishing
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 12:43 +1300, Lists wrote:
> Arthur Dent wrote:
> > The best thing to do is to download the script, put it somewhere where
> > the user that will run it (possibly "clamav") has read + execute access,
> > (I created a /home/clamav/ directory) and then try running it manually
>
Wolfgang Zeikat wrote:
We have set -s for spamc to 350k - and we can use spamassassin -t on
messages of that size, but we can not sa-learn them, sa-learn -D -t puts
out:
Sorry, it's late here. What I meant is
sa-learn -D --spam puts out:
[17460] info: archive-iterator: skipping large messa
Arthur Dent wrote:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 09:49:23AM +1300, Lists wrote:
Hi all,
I am wanting to implement the sanesecurity addins to clamav but i am a
bit lost.
I am running CentOS5 MailScanner Spamassassin ClamAV
Do I download the download scripts from
http://www.sanesecurity.com/cl
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
I am wanting to implement the sanesecurity addins to clamav but i am a
bit lost.
I am running CentOS5 MailScanner Spamassassin ClamAV
Kate, this is the wrong mailing list. The ClamAV users list comes
closest for third-party ClamAV (sic) signatures without a list
We have set -s for spamc to 350k - and we can use spamassassin -t on
messages of that size, but we can not sa-learn them, sa-learn -D -t puts
out:
[17460] info: archive-iterator: skipping large message
Learned tokens from 0 message(s) (0 message(s) examined)
Can we pass the 350k limit to sa-le
Matt Kettler a écrit :
> Brian J. Murrell wrote:
>> If I get a spam and I need to have SA learn that it's spam with
>> sa-learn, wouldn't it be useful to also skew the AWL for that sender so
>> that future uses of the AWL for that spammer will push the overall spam
>> score up?
>>
>> Thots?
>>
>
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Arthur Dent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 01:08:32PM -0500, Rose, Bobby wrote:
>> I just tried again with this 1.5.2 version and on box it times out querying
>> and on another it seems to run but no hits again. Both my boxes are SA3.2.5.
>>
>
> I am wanting to implement the sanesecurity addins to clamav but i am a
> bit lost.
> I am running CentOS5 MailScanner Spamassassin ClamAV
Kate, this is the wrong mailing list. The ClamAV users list comes
closest for third-party ClamAV (sic) signatures without a list of their
own.
> Do I downlo
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 09:49:23AM +1300, Lists wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am wanting to implement the sanesecurity addins to clamav but i am a
> bit lost.
> I am running CentOS5 MailScanner Spamassassin ClamAV
>
> Do I download the download scripts from
> http://www.sanesecurity.com/clamav/usage.h
Hi all,
I am wanting to implement the sanesecurity addins to clamav but i am a
bit lost.
I am running CentOS5 MailScanner Spamassassin ClamAV
Do I download the download scripts from
http://www.sanesecurity.com/clamav/usage.htm
or do I go to the downloads page? (they seem to be different)
On
Never mind the below, I solved it with
header J_CHSET3
Subject:raw=~/\s=\?(windows-(125[0125]|874)|koi8-r|GB2312|iso-8859-[28])\?/i
The below:
Here we go again.
How can I filter on
X-Spam-Languages: zh.gb2312
run it through spamassassin a second time?
Use _LANGUAGES_ somehow in a regexp?
Of cours
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 01:08:32PM -0500, Rose, Bobby wrote:
> I just tried again with this 1.5.2 version and on box it times out querying
> and on another it seems to run but no hits again. Both my boxes are SA3.2.5.
>
> Does anyone have a message that is known to have hashes on any of iXhash
I am completing some testing on new altermime version 0.3.10 for freebsd
(it has already been submitted to ports)
If you remember, using dkim signing and altermime would add \r\n to
emails if you added disclaimers.
(i have separate plain text and html disclaimers)
Several emails to [EMAIL P
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 17:38 +, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
> Is Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SAGrey part of the stat SA set? Neither
> yum nor CPAN seem to be able to find it here... though that could
> easily be down to user error.
Google finds it quite easily. ;)
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassas
I just tried again with this 1.5.2 version and on box it times out querying and
on another it seems to run but no hits again. Both my boxes are SA3.2.5.
Does anyone have a message that is known to have hashes on any of iXhash hosts?
-Original Message-
From: Giampaolo Tomassoni [mailto:[
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 12:04 AM
>
> it's WORKING
Well,
it hangs my SA 3.2.4 setup on waiting for a reply from ctyme.ixhash.net .
The strange thing is that it consumes a lot of CPU while hanging... Some
On Wed, 3 Dec 2008 09:56:58 -0500, Jeff Mincy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> From: Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 23:48:57 -0500
>
> Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> > If I get a spam and I need to have SA learn that it's spam with
> > sa-learn, wouldn't it be useful
Yes, Thanks
On Tuesday 02 December 2008 17:38:17 Kenneth Porter wrote:
> --On Thursday, November 27, 2008 10:44 PM -0600 Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I wonder if there is any module for SA to detect pornographic photos, not
> > only OCR.
>
> How about setting up a
--On Tuesday, December 2, 2008 12:23 -0800 Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
You query hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com
Not listed = new (new to us anyhow)
127.0.2.1 = last day
127.0.2.2 = last week
127.0.2.3 = older than a week
OK - so here's the rub. This catches 100% of all new domai
From: Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 23:48:57 -0500
Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> If I get a spam and I need to have SA learn that it's spam with
> sa-learn, wouldn't it be useful to also skew the AWL for that sender so
> that future uses of the AWL for th
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 07:13:26AM -0700, Kelly Jones wrote:
> SA doesn't use EvalTests.pm's check_for_from_to_same test, but part of
> the code looks like this:
Wow. Had to whip out the 3.1 code to find this...
> Is that right? Shouldn't the 'eq' be 'ne'?
As the comment about 6 lines up from t
SA doesn't use EvalTests.pm's check_for_from_to_same test, but part of
the code looks like this:
return 0 if (!length($hdr_from) || !length($hdr_to) ||
$hdr_from eq $hdr_to);
Is that right? Shouldn't the 'eq' be 'ne'?
--
We're just a Bunch Of Regular Guys, a collective group th
On Wed, December 3, 2008 05:48, Matt Kettler wrote:
> That said, I've never seen a spammer re-use the same address twice.
i have :-)
olso why spf / dkim whitelist is the way to go, let spammers try to
get whitelisted
microsoft got it wroung with "Block Sender" :)
--
Benny Pedersen
Need more
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 03:36 -0800, Björn K wrote:
> Thank you, that should help. I don't really wanna print the whole headers
> here (not giving away too many internals on how which company's mails I
> handle in which way and what problems I have with it).
Forwarding mail for companies (smells lik
Thank you, that should help. I don't really wanna print the whole headers
here (not giving away too many internals on how which company's mails I
handle in which way and what problems I have with it).
It's a spamassassin 3.1.7 out of the Debian (Etch) repository (debian
revision 2).
Karsten Brä
Björn K wrote on Wed, 3 Dec 2008 02:00:32 -0800 (PST):
> How can the results be so very different on the same spam process?
Too many whys ;-) Comparing overall scores doesn't provide any insight.
You want to compare the rules that hit, then you'll see what is different
(and most of the differen
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 02:00 -0800, Björn K wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am relatively new to SpamAssassin and have some problems with email which
> seems to get completely different scores when I check them manually than
> when the automatic check upon reception by the Exim mail server is
> performed.
>
Hello,
I am relatively new to SpamAssassin and have some problems with email which
seems to get completely different scores when I check them manually than
when the automatic check upon reception by the Exim mail server is
performed.
Before we use an own spam filter the mail was put into an imap
At 18:23 02-12-2008, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
Are you using FreeBSD or NetBSD? If so, i understand you.
Unfortunately, SA developers do not care about IPv6 yet. So here SA
program at first do action with "127.0.0.1" than "::1", i guess ;;
This was tested on a BSD system. SpamAssassin developers
47 matches
Mail list logo