On Mon, January 26, 2009 18:01, McDonald, Dan wrote:
I would like to add a test that scores a From: not in the freemail
list, with a Reply-to: in the freemail list. Shouldn't be worth
much (maybe .5) but I think it will get enough to push some of
these advance-fee scams over the top.
LuKreme wrote on Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:17:25 -0700:
Second question is, can I use
formail -s to split the mbox up and feed one message at a time to sa-
learn? And if so, what is the syntax? sa-learn seems to want a file
No, it works fine on maildirs, as a default.
and I just don't know
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 10:34 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Mon, January 26, 2009 18:01, McDonald, Dan wrote:
I would like to add a test that scores a From: not in the freemail
list, with a Reply-to: in the freemail list. Shouldn't be worth
much (maybe .5) but I think it will get enough to
On Tue, January 27, 2009 13:31, McDonald, Dan wrote:
Nope. FREEMAIL_REPLYTO is only true if there is a FREEMAIL_FROM and
the reply-to: header or the body contains a different freemail
address.
add # before return in line 553 should be it as i read it, then it
olso check reply-to even if
Dan McDonald wrote on Tue, 27 Jan 2009 06:31:07 -0600:
Nope. FREEMAIL_REPLYTO is only true if there is a FREEMAIL_FROM and the
reply-to: header or the body contains a different freemail address. I
want a rule to fire for FREEMAIL_REPLYTO even if the From: header does
not contain a freemail
On Tue, January 27, 2009 15:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
What's the problem deriving that rule from the existing rules?
FREEMAIL_REPLYTO can only hit if FREEMAIL_FROM hit, so one cant make
meta for the reply-to
--
http://localhost/ 100% uptime and 100% mirrored :)
On 27-Jan-2009, at 04:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
LuKreme wrote on Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:17:25 -0700:
Second question is, can I use
formail -s to split the mbox up and feed one message at a time to sa-
learn? And if so, what is the syntax? sa-learn seems to want a file
No, it works fine on
LuKreme wrote on Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:43:15 -0700:
Ah, right, I know that, but that wasn't the question.
No? I thought it was. Or at least in this area. see below.
Converting shell users from mbox to Maildir is not trivial, as far as
I know.
But you wrote your users are Maildir users.
Dave Pooser a écrit :
manual training on any FPs/FNs that were not correctly autolearned from is a
good idea.
Also, it does no harm to re-learn messages that have already been learned,
so it's perfectly acceptable to set up a cron job to learn the contents of a
folder as spam and then just
Karsten Bräckelmann a écrit :
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 15:29 +, Arthur Dent wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:48:55PM +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
I explained it slightly more detailed in Bug 6008.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6008
Ahhh.. I see (er I
Hi All,
Is there are central point for links or dissemination of 'best
practice' rules?
I freely admit this is my 1st port of call.
I'm wondering if there is a simple (i.e works for a muppet like me)
page that lists details of how to synch non sa-update rules. The
question is based on the sad
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:01:07AM -0600, McDonald, Dan wrote:
I've been using the FreeMail.pm plugin to good effect, but I would like
to expand it slightly.
Currently it fires if the From: header contains a freemail address, or
if the From: and Reply-to: headers contain different freemail
12 matches
Mail list logo
