Something like the old 70_sc_top200 - 'Top200 SpamCop Relays'

2009-04-17 Thread Marcelo Galeti
Hello Guys, Do you know if are there something like the old 'Top200 SpamCop Relays' 70_sc_top200 ? wget http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/70_sc_top200.cf Thank you very much to all, Marcelo Galeti -- View this message in context:

Re: sa-compile

2009-04-17 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 21:58 +0100, Matt wrote: Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: Wonder why that is -- due to the excessively long metas? The sub-rules' REs are quite trivial. Would constructing it using a binary (or n-ary, with small upper bound of n) tree speed the compilation up? Using

Re: Something like the old 70_sc_top200 - 'Top200 SpamCop Relays'

2009-04-17 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 02:39 -0700, Marcelo Galeti wrote: Hello Guys, Wow, a Nabble user with a real name. :) Do you know if are there something like the old 'Top200 SpamCop Relays' 70_sc_top200 ? Not strictly a list of the top 200, but isn't this covered by the more extensive

RE: Something like the old 70_sc_top200 - 'Top200 SpamCop Relays'

2009-04-17 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
-Original Message- From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:guent...@rudersport.de] Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 2:48 PM On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 02:39 -0700, Marcelo Galeti wrote: Hello Guys, Wow, a Nabble user with a real name. :) Do you know if are there something like the old

Re: spam not classified

2009-04-17 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
stefan novak wrote: I've updatet the file with the headers: http://pastebin.com/m6e31520c On 12.04.09 10:30, Bill Landry wrote: Scored high here: Content analysis details: (32.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description --

Re: sa-compile

2009-04-17 Thread Matt
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: Would constructing it using a binary (or n-ary, with small upper bound of n) tree speed the compilation up? Err, Matt, just had a very brief look at the code and the resulting metas, but -- how is that different? :) The result is exactly the tree

Re: Something like the old 70_sc_top200 - 'Top200 SpamCop Relays'

2009-04-17 Thread Marcelo Galeti
Yeh ! You are right ! I was justing thinking in way SareRules say this rule is Active but you are right ! This RSCV rule cover the same thing. Thank you very much !!! ;) Marcelo Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote: On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 02:39 -0700, Marcelo Galeti wrote: Hello Guys,

RE: Something like the old 70_sc_top200 - 'Top200 SpamCop Relays'

2009-04-17 Thread Marcelo Galeti
Giampaolo, You read my mind :)) Greatings and take care ! Marcelo Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: -Original Message- From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:guent...@rudersport.de] Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 2:48 PM On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 02:39 -0700, Marcelo Galeti wrote: Hello

RE: Something like the old 70_sc_top200 - 'Top200 SpamCop Relays'

2009-04-17 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 15:43 +0200, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: From: Karsten Bräckelmann Not strictly a list of the top 200, but isn't this covered by the more extensive RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET dnsbl test? As you already pointed out, they are not exactly the same. More precisely: If that

Re: Something like the old 70_sc_top200 - 'Top200 SpamCop Relays'

2009-04-17 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 11:25 -0700, Marcelo Galeti wrote: Yeh ! You are right ! I was justing thinking in way SareRules say this rule is Active but you are right ! This RSCV rule cover the same thing. Given that this rule-set is deprecated since *before* 3.0 already, here goes some advice

Re: spamc: oops! message_dump

2009-04-17 Thread James Butler
James Butler wrote: System: Fedora 10, Spamassassin 3.2.5, Perl 5.10.0 The following error is preceded by log entry: spamc[PID]: skipped message, greater than max message size (512000 bytes) Error: spamc[PID]: oops! message_dump of 8192 returned different (there are as many of those errors

RE: Something like the old 70_sc_top200 - 'Top200 SpamCop Relays'

2009-04-17 Thread Marcelo Galeti
OK Guys, I understood ! Thanks for this help. Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: -Original Message- From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:guent...@rudersport.de] Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 2:48 PM On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 02:39 -0700, Marcelo Galeti wrote: Hello Guys, Wow, a Nabble

Re: sa-compile

2009-04-17 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 16:18 +0100, Matt wrote: Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: Err, Matt, just had a very brief look at the code and the resulting metas, but -- how is that different? :) Blame that comment on lack of sleep - I read that as limiting the depth of the tree and not being an

RE: Something like the old 70_sc_top200 - 'Top200 SpamCop Relays'

2009-04-17 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
-Original Message- From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:guent...@rudersport.de] Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 8:48 PM ...omissis... Not strictly a list of the top 200, but isn't this covered by the more extensive RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET dnsbl test? As you already pointed out,

RE: Something like the old 70_sc_top200 - 'Top200 SpamCop Relays'

2009-04-17 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 22:53 +0200, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: From: Karsten Bräckelmann More precisely: If that rule-set still would be generated, it would be a sub-set of bl.spamcop.net. It is a ranked chunk of the top 200 spammers, not just a subset. It could even make sense to score

Beating a dead horse: reporting to Razor2

2009-04-17 Thread Jari Fredriksson
report[23714]: reporter: razor2 report failed: No such file or directory report requires authentication at /usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Razor2.pm line 178. at /usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Razor2.pm line 326. Running SA 3.2.5 razord-admin -create razord-admin

Re: Beating a dead horse: reporting to Razor2

2009-04-17 Thread Jari Fredriksson
Never mind.. was running SA as wrong user id.