Hello Guys,
Do you know if are there something like the old 'Top200 SpamCop Relays'
70_sc_top200 ?
wget http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/70_sc_top200.cf
Thank you very much to all,
Marcelo Galeti
--
View this message in context:
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 21:58 +0100, Matt wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Wonder why that is -- due to the excessively long metas? The sub-rules'
REs are quite trivial.
Would constructing it using a binary (or n-ary, with small upper bound
of n) tree speed the compilation up?
Using
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 02:39 -0700, Marcelo Galeti wrote:
Hello Guys,
Wow, a Nabble user with a real name. :)
Do you know if are there something like the old 'Top200 SpamCop Relays'
70_sc_top200 ?
Not strictly a list of the top 200, but isn't this covered by the more
extensive
-Original Message-
From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:guent...@rudersport.de]
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 2:48 PM
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 02:39 -0700, Marcelo Galeti wrote:
Hello Guys,
Wow, a Nabble user with a real name. :)
Do you know if are there something like the old
stefan novak wrote:
I've updatet the file with the headers:
http://pastebin.com/m6e31520c
On 12.04.09 10:30, Bill Landry wrote:
Scored high here:
Content analysis details: (32.9 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Would constructing it using a binary (or n-ary, with small upper bound
of n) tree speed the compilation up?
Err, Matt, just had a very brief look at the code and the resulting
metas, but -- how is that different? :)
The result is exactly the tree
Yeh ! You are right ! I was justing thinking in way SareRules say this rule
is Active but you are right ! This RSCV rule cover the same thing.
Thank you very much !!!
;) Marcelo
Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 02:39 -0700, Marcelo Galeti wrote:
Hello Guys,
Giampaolo,
You read my mind :))
Greatings and take care !
Marcelo
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:guent...@rudersport.de]
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 2:48 PM
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 02:39 -0700, Marcelo Galeti wrote:
Hello
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 15:43 +0200, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
From: Karsten Bräckelmann
Not strictly a list of the top 200, but isn't this covered by the more
extensive RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET dnsbl test?
As you already pointed out, they are not exactly the same.
More precisely: If that
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 11:25 -0700, Marcelo Galeti wrote:
Yeh ! You are right ! I was justing thinking in way SareRules say this rule
is Active but you are right ! This RSCV rule cover the same thing.
Given that this rule-set is deprecated since *before* 3.0 already, here
goes some advice
James Butler wrote:
System: Fedora 10, Spamassassin 3.2.5, Perl 5.10.0
The following error is preceded by log entry:
spamc[PID]: skipped message, greater than max message size (512000 bytes)
Error: spamc[PID]: oops! message_dump of 8192 returned different
(there are as many of those errors
OK Guys,
I understood ! Thanks for this help.
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:guent...@rudersport.de]
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 2:48 PM
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 02:39 -0700, Marcelo Galeti wrote:
Hello Guys,
Wow, a Nabble
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 16:18 +0100, Matt wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Err, Matt, just had a very brief look at the code and the resulting
metas, but -- how is that different? :)
Blame that comment on lack of sleep - I read that as limiting the depth
of the tree and not being an
-Original Message-
From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:guent...@rudersport.de]
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 8:48 PM
...omissis...
Not strictly a list of the top 200, but isn't this covered by the
more
extensive RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET dnsbl test?
As you already pointed out,
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 22:53 +0200, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
From: Karsten Bräckelmann
More precisely: If that rule-set still would be generated, it would be a
sub-set of bl.spamcop.net.
It is a ranked chunk of the top 200 spammers, not just a subset. It
could even make sense to score
report[23714]: reporter: razor2 report failed: No such file or directory report
requires authentication at /usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Razor2.pm
line 178. at /usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Razor2.pm line 326.
Running SA 3.2.5
razord-admin -create
razord-admin
Never mind.. was running SA as wrong user id.
17 matches
Mail list logo