On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 19:50 -0700, Robert Hanson wrote:
i seem to recall that the SA list software accepts submissions from
non-subscribed addresses [...]
It doesn't. Posts by non-subscribers are held for moderation, to be
processed by humans. Same for low-scoring spam, BTW.
I am not the only
Hi
Whenever I run sa-learn it claims to learn from every message regardless of
whether its being run immediately after being run on the same folder.
Is this normal or is this a problem ?
Ben
--
View this message in context:
peperami97 wrote:
Hi
Whenever I run sa-learn it claims to learn from every message regardless of
whether its being run immediately after being run on the same folder.
Is this normal or is this a problem ?
That would seem to be a problem. It shouldn't relearn from the same
message..
are
On 30/08/2009 20:30, Matt Kettler wrote:
peperami97 wrote:
Hi
Whenever I run sa-learn it claims to learn from every message regardless of
whether its being run immediately after being run on the same folder.
Is this normal or is this a problem ?
That would seem to be a problem. It
By default:
~/.spamassassin/bayes_seen
(ie: inside the .spamassassin subdierctory of your home directory)
I found it I assume. Its in /home/.spamassassin/spamassassin_seen
.spamassassin_seen is not getting updated
.spamassasin_toks is getting updated
Ben
Ben Whyte wrote:
By default:
~/.spamassassin/bayes_seen
(ie: inside the .spamassassin subdierctory of your home directory)
I found it I assume. Its in /home/.spamassassin/spamassassin_seen
.spamassassin_seen is not getting updated
.spamassasin_toks is getting updated
Ben
Erm.
On 29-Aug-2009, at 07:41, Mynabbler wrote:
I am getting rather tired from messages spamming porn-portals. They
typically
originate from hotmail.com,
Er, do they really originate from hotmail servers, or are they simply
spoofing a hotmail return address? Are you using zen?
--
A: You're
On 29-Aug-2009, at 11:47, R-Elists wrote:
have many, or any of you folks on the list migrated your production
servers
to the 3.3.0 alpha 2 or later release?
Er.. hopefully no one did this on a production server. Or if they did
they are not really understanding 'alpha' and are willing to
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 08:10:23PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
On 29-Aug-2009, at 11:47, R-Elists wrote:
have many, or any of you folks on the list migrated your production
servers
to the 3.3.0 alpha 2 or later release?
Er.. hopefully no one did this on a production server. Or if they did
