On 21-Sep-2009, at 13:05, poifgh wrote:
Mails which have very high or very low score are fed to bayesian
learning.
Since we are confident about them being HAM or SPAM what do we want
to learn
from them - The regex filters have identified that the mail is a
spam (say),
what additional does
On Tuesday September 22 2009 06:32:12 Benny Pedersen wrote:
On man 21 sep 2009 20:33:57 CEST, MySQL Student wrote
but this will invalidtate dkim headers if this headers
is signed, are spamassassin aware of this problem ? (in general)
Are you saying there is a bug?
partly yes, its not a
Hello,
please configure your mailer to wrap lines below 80 characters per line.
72 to 75 is usually OK.
Thank you.
On 19.09.09 22:45, João Eiras wrote:
I still haven't got the answer to my last question, so here it goes
again: Can I report a full mbs file with many mails in one go ? Or
I would like to configure Spamassassin to only do certain tests
when the required_score is not yet reached.
For example, do the usual rule-based and bayesian tests first,
and if the score is lower than the required_score,
then do the DCC and RAZOR2 tests.
Is it possible?
On tir 22 sep 2009 09:43:23 CEST, LuKreme wrote
bayes learning from ham helps score messages as
ham that might otherwise be tagged as ham.
ups :)
--
xpoint
ArtemGr wrote:
I would like to configure Spamassassin to only do certain tests
when the required_score is not yet reached.
For example, do the usual rule-based and bayesian tests first,
and if the score is lower than the required_score,
then do the DCC and RAZOR2 tests.
Is it possible?
Matt Kettler mkettler_sa at verizon.net writes:
In theory, a feature could be added to let you do something like this
(SA doesn't have this feature, but I'm proposing it could be added):
That would be a nice optimization: most of the spam we receive have a 10 score.
It seems a real waste of
On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 23:18 -0400, MySQL Student wrote:
How can I tell when another process is using the database and when it
is free for my script to use?
Is there a faster way to run spamassassin just to strip the SA headers?
Try using a local SA setup for stripping the headers. By local,
ArtemGr artemciy at gmail.com writes:
I would like to configure Spamassassin to only do certain tests
when the required_score is not yet reached.
For example, do the usual rule-based and bayesian tests first,
and if the score is lower than the required_score,
then do the DCC and RAZOR2 tests.
hi,
I set to work with RBL Spamassasin by skip_rbl_checks option 0.
But in my statistics were not reporting any RBL test
Run spamassassin-D-lint
And these messages came out
[5563] dbg: dns: no ipv6
[5563] dbg: dns: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
[5563] dbg: dns: Net::DNS
Luis campo wrote:
hi,
I set to work with RBL Spamassasin by skip_rbl_checks option 0.
But in my statistics were not reporting any RBL test
Run spamassassin-D-lint
http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=en-ussource=wlmailtagline
One of the side-effects of
Matt Kettler mkettler_sa at verizon.net writes:
In theory, a feature could be added to let you do something like this
(SA doesn't have this feature, but I'm proposing it could be added):
On 22.09.09 11:46, ArtemGr wrote:
That would be a nice optimization: most of the spam we receive have a
ArtemGr artemciy at gmail.com writes:
I would like to configure Spamassassin to only do certain tests
when the required_score is not yet reached.
For example, do the usual rule-based and bayesian tests first,
and if the score is lower than the required_score,
then do the DCC and RAZOR2
Thank you, John!
Both how-to (http://sa-russian.narod.ru/no_russian.html) and the ruleset
(http://sa-russian.narod.ru/files/20090916/99_no_russian_mail.cf) are updated.
On tir 22 sep 2009 17:24:30 CEST, Luis campo wrote
[4315] dbg: rules: local tests only, ignoring RBL eval
--lint will disable rbl testing so:
spamassassin 21 -D | less
any errors ?
--
xpoint
Dear friends,
I appreciate your support.
Yesterday at approximately 15:00 make some changes:
- Add to SA skip_rbl_checks RBL 0
- Increase required_score from 3.5 to 5.0
Spam Statistics from yesterday were:
Total messages:Ham: Spam: % Spam:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Jose Luis Marin Perez wrote:
Additionally I noticed that there are emails that should detect as SPAM
(for example those of 100 points - Advertising) but not filtered.
What more could add or remove the configuration of the SA?
First we need to see why they aren't being
Dear Sirs.
Thank you for your answers
I'll gather
some examples of emails that my users are considered as SPAM (Latest I
could configure SA to display the report in the headers)
Regarding the questions:
1. Yes I have set up qmail-smtpd to use rblsmtpd and definitively blocks a lot
of
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Jose Luis Marin Perez wrote:
I'll gather some examples of emails that my users are considered as SPAM
(Latest I could configure SA to display the report in the headers)
Regarding the questions:
1. Yes I have set up qmail-smtpd to use rblsmtpd and definitively blocks
a
Hi,
Try using a local SA setup for stripping the headers. By local, I mean
don't use your main production SA - run a separate copy with its own
(cut down) configuration and all data base accesses and UBL calls etc
turned off.
Much better idea, thanks. Thanks for the script, too.
Best,
Alex
Dear Sirs.
Thank you for your answers
Qmail-Smtpd have the following RBL configured:
bl.spamcop.net
cbl.abuseat.org
combined.njabl.org
These are the SARE rules which adds to SA:
echo 70_sare_adult.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
/etc/mail/spamassassin/sare-sa-update-channels.txt
spamassassin -r and spamassassin -k do other things - report to network
services like razor/pyzor/dcc and SpamCop.
Hum, then how do the default spam filters that come with a clean spam assassin
installation know what's spam and what's not ?
Is there service we can report spam to ?
Jose Luis Marin Perez wrote:
Dear Sirs.
Thank you for your answers
Qmail-Smtpd have the following RBL configured:
* bl.spamcop.net
cbl.abuseat.org
combined.njabl.org
*
You might want to try zen.spamhaus.org. That is the only one I trust
enough to block mail on my MTA.
These are the
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Jose Luis Marin Perez wrote:
echo 70_sare_highrisk.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
/etc/mail/spamassassin/sare-sa-update-channels.txt
Did you read the ruleset descriptions before choosing which ones to use?
Inquire about rules SOUGHT
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Jose Luis Marin Perez
jolumape...@hotmail.com wrote:
Dear Sirs.
Thank you for your answers
Qmail-Smtpd have the following RBL configured:
bl.spamcop.net
cbl.abuseat.org
combined.njabl.org
Consider zen. It is excellent. Spamcop and NJABL have caused too
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:03:16 +0100
Martin Gregorie mar...@gregorie.org wrote:
gawk '
BEGIN { act = copy }
/^X-Spam/ { act = skip }
/^[A-WYZ]/ { act = copy }
{
From: MySQL Student mysqlstud...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:38:47 -0400
Try using a local SA setup for stripping the headers. By local, I mean
don't use your main production SA - run a separate copy with its own
(cut down) configuration and all data base accesses and
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Jeff Mincy wrote:
From: MySQL Student mysqlstud...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:38:47 -0400
Try using a local SA setup for stripping the headers. By local, I mean
don't use your main production SA - run a separate copy with its own
(cut down)
Hi all --
FYI, I had a chat with Steve Santorelli a while back for Team Cymru's
'Who and Why Show' podcast -- an occasional series designed to directly
assist
network administrators, looking at various Open Source Tools that can
be used to check and secure systems. It's now up:
Today we talk
On 22-Sep-2009, at 14:42, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
Also consider the invalument block lists, see http://dnsbl.invaluement.com/
A very, very good list that is usable for blocking. Not free, but
very affordable.
I don't like how involvement does their pricing structure, actually.
Firstly, I don't
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:21 PM, LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote:
On 22-Sep-2009, at 14:42, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
Also consider the invalument block lists, see
http://dnsbl.invaluement.com/
A very, very good list that is usable for blocking. Not free, but
very affordable.
I don't like how
Every so often, I see some large MySQL accesses taking place from SA. Is there
any regular maintenance needed or should I just leave it alone?
--
Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have .0.
happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say
32 matches
Mail list logo
