> Matt Kettler <mkettler_sa <at> verizon.net> writes: > > In theory, a feature could be added to let you do something like this > > (SA doesn't have this feature, but I'm proposing it could be added):
On 22.09.09 11:46, ArtemGr wrote: > That would be a nice optimization: most of the spam we receive have a >10 > score. It seems a real waste of resource to perform all the complex tests > (like distributed hashing or OCR-ing) on spam which is DNS and > rule-detectable. You haven't read Matt's explanation of why it wasn't a good idea, did you? There are rules with negative scores, which can puch the score back to the ham, e.g. whitelist. Would you like to stop scoring before e.g. whitelist is checked? -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Micro$oft random number generator: 0, 0, 0, 4.33e+67, 0, 0, 0...
