For some reason when I send my self and email from my personal Postfix
mail server and add an attachment and or a URL hyperlink, it gets
flagged as ***SPAM*** from my email server. The headers are tagged
***SPAM*** from my Postfix mail server running Spamassassin and then
when I receive the
* Carlos Williams carlosw...@gmail.com:
3.4 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX The date is grossly in the future.
Did you update using saupdate?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203
3.4 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX The date is grossly in the future.
Looks like someone has not applied the Jan 2010 patch
==John ff
sa-update
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Carlos Williams carlosw...@gmail.com:
3.4 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX The date is grossly in the future.
Did you update using saupdate?
--
Esta mensagem, incluindo seus anexos, podem conter informacoes privilegiadas e/ou de carater confidencial,
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:43 AM, John ffitch j...@codemist.co.uk wrote:
3.4 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX The date is grossly in the future.
Looks like someone has not applied the Jan 2010 patch
Yes - guilty as charged. Sorry all for my ignorance. I can sadly say I
have never ran 'sa-update' but when
I've problems telling spamass-milter to reject mails.
spamass-milter - Version 0.3.1
I start it by:
/usr/local/sbin/spamass-milter -p /var/run/spamass.sock -b
spam...@ourdomain.com -u smmsp -f -r 15 -- -d spamscanner.ourdomain.com
It should reject spam mails with a score higher 15, else send
On 08/02/2010 14:48, Carlos Williams wrote:
3.4 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX The date is grossly in the future.
Looks like someone has not applied the Jan 2010 patch
Yes - guilty as charged. Sorry all for my ignorance. I can sadly say I
have never ran 'sa-update' but when I tried, I got this
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Mike Cardwell
spamassassin-us...@lists.grepular.com wrote:
The error message, gpg required but not found, means that gpg was
required, but was not found. I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest
that maybe gpg wasn't found, but is required, and that you
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 15:07, Carlos Williams carlosw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Mike Cardwell
spamassassin-us...@lists.grepular.com wrote:
The error message, gpg required but not found, means that gpg was
required, but was not found. I'm going to go out on a limb here
I have some little problem with SpamAssassin
SpamAssassin with MailScanner .
I set the rule in mailscanner
# This can also be the filename of a ruleset.
Cache SpamAssassin Results = yes
SpamAssassin Cache Database File =
/var/spool/MailScanner/incoming/SpamAssassin.cache.db
I now the 3
You should have tried the MailScanner mailing list.
stop MailScanner, rm
/var/spool/MailScanner/incoming/SpamAssassin.cache.db, and start
MailScanner.
More importantly, you need to update spamassassin and MailScanner to
more current versions.
MailScanner 4.58.9 is over 3 years old, and well out
Carlos Williams wrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Mike Cardwell
spamassassin-us...@lists.grepular.com wrote:
The error message, gpg required but not found, means that gpg was
required, but was not found. I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest
that maybe gpg wasn't found, but
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Bowie Bailey bowie_bai...@buc.com wrote:
Sounds to me like you need to install the actual gpg package.
Installing the keys doesn't do much if the program that uses them
doesn't exist.
Yes this was 1/2 my problem for this matter. I only had GnuPG v2
installed
Here's some more data for whatever it's worth.
Our spam reports box since Jan 25 shows this style in definite spam:
From: Get Cialis on www.wa93.com heirs...@imagina.es
From: Get Tamiflu on www.qa35.com inexpedie...@quantumtouch.nl
From: Cheap Tamiflu on www.nu36.com
On 08/02/2010 16:56, Joseph Brennan wrote:
Here's some more data for whatever it's worth.
Our spam reports box since Jan 25 shows this style in definite spam:
From: Get Cialis on www.wa93.com heirs...@imagina.es
From: Get Tamiflu on www.qa35.com inexpedie...@quantumtouch.nl
From: Cheap
Carlos Williams wrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Bowie Bailey bowie_bai...@buc.com wrote:
Sounds to me like you need to install the actual gpg package.
Installing the keys doesn't do much if the program that uses them
doesn't exist.
Yes this was 1/2 my problem for this
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Bowie Bailey bowie_bai...@buc.com wrote:
I'm not sure why root would have a problem writing to the file.
sa-update-keys IS a directory, right? Try removing the sa-update-keys
file/directory and then running the command again.
I don't think those directories
I have some little problem with SpamAssassin
SpamAssassin with MailScanner .
I set the rule in mailscanner
# This can also be the filename of a ruleset.
Cache SpamAssassin Results = yes
SpamAssassin Cache Database File =
/var/spool/MailScanner/incoming/SpamAssassin.cache.db
I now the 3
Carlos Williams carlosw...@gmail.com came out of the corner and wrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Mike Cardwell
spamassassin-us...@lists.grepular.com wrote:
The error message, gpg required but not found, means that gpg was
required, but was not found. I'm going to go out on a limb here
Carlos Williams wrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Bowie Bailey bowie_bai...@buc.com wrote:
I'm not sure why root would have a problem writing to the file.
sa-update-keys IS a directory, right? Try removing the sa-update-keys
file/directory and then running the command again.
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Bowie Bailey bowie_bai...@buc.com wrote:
sa-update-keys should default to the same location as your local.cf
file. On my system, that is /etc/mail/spamassassin. Create the
directory and try the import again.
I created the directory from scratch using the
Carlos Williams wrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Bowie Bailey bowie_bai...@buc.com wrote:
sa-update-keys should default to the same location as your local.cf
file. On my system, that is /etc/mail/spamassassin. Create the
directory and try the import again.
I created the
Thank you everyone for all your assistance. This is resolved.
-Carlos
Hi Christoph!
Am 08.02.2010 15:50, schrieb Christoph Lehmann:
I've problems telling spamass-milter to reject mails.
spamass-milter - Version 0.3.1
I start it by:
/usr/local/sbin/spamass-milter -p /var/run/spamass.sock -b
spam...@ourdomain.com -u smmsp -f -r 15 -- -d
I think you're both misunderstanding what the -b option does, and
reading the man page, I can see how it could be more explicit.
In any case, the -b option is used to send rejected mail to a
specified email address (in case you want to inspect it). Someone can
correct me if I'm wrong, but I
Hi!
Am 08.02.2010 21:47, schrieb Shane Williams:
I think you're both misunderstanding what the -b option does, and
reading the man page, I can see how it could be more explicit.
In any case, the -b option is used to send rejected mail to a
specified email address (in case you want to
On 2/8/2010 9:52 AM, Tsabolov Sergey wrote:
I have some little problem with SpamAssassin
SpamAssassin with MailScanner .
I set the rule in mailscanner
# This can also be the filename of a ruleset.
Cache SpamAssassin Results = yes
SpamAssassin Cache Database File =
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Andreas Haumer wrote:
Hi!
Am 08.02.2010 21:47, schrieb Shane Williams:
I think you're both misunderstanding what the -b option does, and
reading the man page, I can see how it could be more explicit.
In any case, the -b option is used to send rejected mail to a
specified
Dear sare-users Adam Katz tried to post these to your list. Please read
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general/126545
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general/126547
However, as in
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general/126330
MN
I wrote:
My tests have been mildly successful on this note, with FROM_WWW
already getting promoted out of testing:
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?rule=/FROM_Wsrcpath=khop
This indicates that we don't actually need to parse any further
because there is no sizable mass of legitimate mail
You get an email delivered from 64.71.152.40 (last untrusted
relay). You look up the DNS A record for that IP, and get
mail.chaosreigns.com. Then you look up the DNS PTR record of
40.152.71.64.designatedsender.mail.chaosreigns.com, and if it's
127.0.0.1, it's a legit email sender and gets some
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 22:08 -0500, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
You get an email delivered from 64.71.152.40 (last untrusted
relay). You look up the DNS A record for that IP, and get
mail.chaosreigns.com. Then you look up the DNS PTR record of
ram wrote:
Apparently you want to check if non mail servers are sending mails ..
but what percentage of spams today come from non mail servers ?
The vast majority, I would say.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
33 matches
Mail list logo
