pgpbkzDGoM3Fr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Nmake is not running on 64-bit? Our 2008 x64 is just busy but on my windows 7
x64 it's working fine.
Does it report an error?
For dmake I had similar issues while building the source, nmake works much
better for me, so I suggest you should try that first.
Daniel
-Ursprüngliche
Just tested, definitely running under w2k8 x64, this must be another problem.
Where do you have your nmake from?
Try this:
http://download.microsoft.com/download/vc15/patch/1.52/w95/en-us/nmake15.exe
Daniel
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: weirdbeardmt [mailto:weirdbe...@gmail.com]
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Wolfgang Zeikat wrote:
I have written some body rules to catch cyrillic text, using a utf-8 aware
editor. They work fine in mails with
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
They do not catch the same strings in mails like
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251
On 3/19/10 8:33 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
Am 2010-03-18 14:26:31, schrieb Chris Richman:
Hi, Michael. If there is an email address that you'd like to never
receive email from LinkedIn, let me know and I can add it to our
suppression list.
Sorry for the troubles.
you want
Sorry, I should be clearer, I see that error when I run nmake (not nmake
install).
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Matt Thornton weirdbe...@gmail.com wrote:
HI Daniel. Thanks a lot. Indeed, Nmake does work (it's the extractor that
says it doesn't work...!)
Anyway, I put NMAKE.EXE and the
On 3/18/10 9:00 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
Should have been, but it was never implemented.
Here is a patch to implement it (against 3.3.0 or 3.3.1 or trunk).
Please open a feature request so that it can be properly integrated
into the next version.
done, lets hope we can get it into 3.3.1
Michael,
done, lets hope we can get it into 3.3.1 so I don't have to patch it.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6382
Thanks! The 3.3.1 release procedure freight train has already left
a few days ago, so you'll have to patch it. I expect it to be rolled
into 3.3.2.
Mark
Try another Extract Tool (WinRar worked well for me). I've seen a few tools
that have serious problems extracting those files.
Maybe yours just cuts some linefeeds or so.
Daniel
Von: Matt Thornton [mailto:weirdbe...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 19. März 2010 14:31
An: Daniel Lemke
Cc:
John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Wolfgang Zeikat wrote:
I have written some body rules to catch cyrillic text, using a utf-8
aware editor. They work fine in mails with
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
They do not catch the same strings in mails like
Content-Type: text/plain;
I tried with WinRAR - admittedly i'm extracting on 32bit WinXP then moving
over to W2k8, but still same error.
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Daniel Lemke le...@jam-software.comwrote:
Try another Extract Tool (WinRar worked well for me). I’ve seen a few
tools that have serious problems
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, Ned Slider wrote:
If that's not an option, how about a meta rule for FROM_YAHOO and
__HAS_ANY_URI (this rule exists in SA).
Lots of ham may contain a URI, but how much ham contains ONLY a URI?
Rough outline of rule, untested.
rawbody __BODY_ONLY_URI
Hmm that's strange, I had no problems doing this on a clean W2k8.
Did you previously installed any other perl (ActivePerl, Strawberry Perl)?
What does it says if you try to build on your Win XP?
Daniel
Von: Matt Thornton [mailto:weirdbe...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 19. März 2010 15:02
An:
found in dns: 0.3.3.updates.spamassassin.org = 924671
60_whitelist_dkim.cf:def_whitelist_from_dkim *...@*paypal.com
I think I would understand def_whitelist_from_dkim *...@*paypal.com but
what does the whitespace do?
will it whitelist anything (any domain) if the signer is
Hello Michael,
and of course Chris Richman which I have added to show him a real live
example of LinkedIn sSpam on mailinglists.
Am 2010-03-19 09:25:10, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
you want a list of 237,456 email addresses?
I think it is just easier if I blacklist linkedin.
I have
Michael,
found in dns: 0.3.3.updates.spamassassin.org = 924671
60_whitelist_dkim.cf:def_whitelist_from_dkim *...@* paypal.com
I think I would understand def_whitelist_from_dkim *...@*paypal.com but
what does the whitespace do?
$ man Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM
It doesn't really work that way. Bayes is just one part of the picture and in
order to get good results you have to turn the full toolkit loose on the
problem; I'm not sure Bayes by itself should be expected to achieve 95%
recognition anyway. The main flaw in your current plan is that once
On 10-03-19 7:56 AM, users-digest-h...@spamassassin.apache.org
users-digest-h...@spamassassin.apache.org wrote:
editorial comment
(why would you enter such things as this since neither facebook not
linkedin have any way to stop spamming you?.. no, they don't. all 500MM
people on facebook or
Michael Scheidell wrote:
found in dns: 0.3.3.updates.spamassassin.org = 924671
60_whitelist_dkim.cf:def_whitelist_from_dkim *...@*paypal.com
I think I would understand def_whitelist_from_dkim *...@*paypal.com but
what does the whitespace do?
will it whitelist anything (any
On fre 19 mar 2010 14:16:50 CET, John Hardin wrote
Save another version of your rules encoded in windows-1251?
spamassassin -D generic -t msg
it converts here, but to what ?
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
I've just finished updating my production server to SpamAssassin 3.3.0 and I
immediately ran sa-update to get the latest rule set for SpamAssassin. Is there
a way to tell whether sa-update downloaded the latest definitions correctly?
A user has just emailed me with some SPAM that was sent about
Gary Smith wrote:
I'm not seeing your 130 sec CPU issue on my end. Are as mentioned by Matt, are
you running into some DNS issue? These are stock rule + other house rules in
place. I'm not getting any type of DNS hit, this might because you modified
the headers. Either way, 5 seconds for
Kaleb Hosie wrote:
I've just finished updating my production server to SpamAssassin 3.3.0 and I
immediately ran sa-update to get the latest rule set for SpamAssassin. Is
there a way to tell whether sa-update downloaded the latest definitions
correctly?
A user has just emailed me with some
The body from the message RE: unwhitelist from_dkim?, originally sent to you
by Chris Richman (crich...@linkedin.com), has been forwarded to you from the
Microsoft Forefront Server Security Quarantine area.
This message body may have been re-scanned by Microsoft Forefront Server
Security and
The body from the message RE: unwhitelist from_dkim?, originally sent to you
by Chris Richman (crich...@linkedin.com), has been forwarded to you from the
Microsoft Forefront Server Security Quarantine area.
This message body may have been re-scanned by Microsoft Forefront Server
Security and
The body from the message RE: unwhitelist from_dkim?, originally sent to you
by Chris Richman (crich...@linkedin.com), has been forwarded to you from the
Microsoft Forefront Server Security Quarantine area.
This message body may have been re-scanned by Microsoft Forefront Server
Security and
Bowie Bailey wrote:
The main problem is the BAYES_00 rule. Apparently, your bayes db thinks this
email is definitely not spam. Are you sure it is being trained properly?
Without any bayes hit, this would have scored 4.8. If you can get bayes to
score it as spam, you'll have it.
--
Bowie
I
Release Notes -- Apache SpamAssassin -- Version 3.3.1
Introduction
This is a minor release, adding a new URIBL network rule (URIBL_DBL_SPAM, for
the
Spamhaus DBL).
Downloading and availability
Downloads are available from:
Have also tried updated version of nmake that came with Visual Studio 2008
(v9.00 ish..) and still same error.
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Matt Thornton weirdbe...@gmail.com wrote:
OK this is so bizarre. Have just installed everything on my local
workstation (Win XP) - and I get the
On Friday 19 March 2010 16:17:21 Kaleb Hosie wrote:
Is there a way to tell whether sa-update downloaded the latest definitions
correctly?
Yes:
sa-update -v
Mark
Hi,
See this link for a way to train bayes, when using exchange.
mvh
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Kaleb Hosie kho...@spectraaluminum.com wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
The main problem is the BAYES_00 rule. Apparently, your bayes db thinks this
email is definitely not spam. Are you sure it
On 3/19/2010 5:25 AM, weirdbeardmt wrote:
I'm trying to install SA 3.30 on W2k8 64-bit. I have ActivePerl 5.10.1 with
dmake 4.12 (since nmake won't run on 64-bit). I am quite new to this so
sorry if I'm asking something stupidly obvious.
I've installed Net-DNS, IP-Country, Mail-SPF, Error,
Hi, Michelle. I've added those domains to our suppression list so they
shouldn't receive email from us anymore. I wasn't able to add gnome.org
because we have several users with confirmed gnome.org email addresses.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Michelle Konzack
On 3/19/10 12:31 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
Release Notes -- Apache SpamAssassin -- Version 3.3.1
http://www.apache.org/dist/spamassassin/source/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.1.tar.gz.md5
error 404
the requested file is not found on this server.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
Phone: 561-999-5000, x 1259
Chris Richman wrote:
Hi, Michelle. I've added those domains to our suppression list so they
shouldn't receive email from us anymore. I wasn't able to add gnome.org
because we have several users with confirmed gnome.org email addresses.
I would like to recommend that you find a way to
On 2010/03/19 2:24 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 3/19/10 12:31 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
Release Notes -- Apache SpamAssassin -- Version 3.3.1
http://www.apache.org/dist/spamassassin/source/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.1.tar.gz.md5
error 404
the requested file is not found on this server.
I
On 3/19/10 12:31 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
Release Notes -- Apache SpamAssassin -- Version 3.3.1
I clicked on the download and got redirected (hijacked)? to this site:
http://www.takeyellow.com/apachemirror/spamassassin/source/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.1.tar.gz
TAKEYELLOW IS NO LONGER UNDER
schrieb Michael Scheidell:
On 3/19/10 12:31 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
Release Notes -- Apache SpamAssassin -- Version 3.3.1
http://www.apache.org/dist/spamassassin/source/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.1.tar.gz.md5
error 404
the requested file is not found on this server.
use CPAN, everything is
is this the right syntax? (I heard that if you don't have the
commercial version of DCC, you get link and debug warnings)
can someone without the commercial version of DCC see if this stops the
debug warnings?
# DCC
ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC
score DCC_CHECK0 1.1
On 3/19/10 2:37 PM, Jim Knuth wrote:
schrieb Michael Scheidell:
On 3/19/10 12:31 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
Release Notes -- Apache SpamAssassin -- Version 3.3.1
http://www.apache.org/dist/spamassassin/source/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.1.tar.gz.md5
error 404
the requested file is not found on
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:17:21 -0400
Kaleb Hosie kho...@spectraaluminum.com wrote:
The only configuration I've changed since the install was the
report_safe and trusted_networks option. Is there something else
I need to configure to fine tune SA?
You need to set internal_networks.
You can set
Hello Chris,
Am 2010-03-19 11:06:08, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Hi, Michelle. I've added those domains to our suppression list so they
shouldn't receive email from us anymore. I wasn't able to add gnome.org
because we have several users with confirmed gnome.org email addresses.
The
On Mar 19, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
Release Notes -- Apache SpamAssassin -- Version 3.3.1
The Ubuntu package for hardy is *way* out of date and seemingly stuck at 3.2.5,
Is it safe to update via CPAN and still retain compatibility with
apt-get/aptitude?
Cheers!
Thanks, Michelle, I've added those to our suppression list, too. Oddly
enough, a user had actually confirmed gtk-l...@gnome.org, so I removed
it from his account.
If anyone knows of a reliable way to identify mailing list addresses,
I'd love to know so we could block mail to them. Currently, we
We've got a project planned for Q2 that might help with this. We
currently segregate some of our mail streams by sending IP.
Unfortunately, too many types of messages (including invitations) are
still sent from the catch-all IPs. With this project, we should have
all of the major mail streams
Hi
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Jonathan Nichols jnich...@pbp.net wrote:
On Mar 19, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
Release Notes -- Apache SpamAssassin -- Version 3.3.1
The Ubuntu package for hardy is *way* out of date and seemingly stuck at
3.2.5, Is it safe to update via
Hello Chris,
Am 2010-03-19 15:11:37, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Thanks, Michelle, I've added those to our suppression list, too. Oddly
enough, a user had actually confirmed gtk-l...@gnome.org, so I removed
it from his account.
OK,
If anyone knows of a reliable way to identify mailing
Hello Chris,
Am 2010-03-19 15:20:40, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Obviously we'd prefer that nobody filter our mail, but, like I said
before, we recognize that it only hurts us to send mail to people who
don't want it. We'll continue taking steps to prevent mail from gong to
people who
Michelle Konzack wrote:
I could even say Block my domain tamay-dogan.net but what is IF one
of my employees want to use LinedIn, Facebook or Twitter?
This is exactly what I'm asking for.
If my users choose to sign up, fine, let them use it and then
/those/ addresses can receive
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 15:11 -0700, Chris Richman wrote:
Thanks, Michelle, I've added those to our suppression list, too. Oddly
enough, a user had actually confirmed gtk-l...@gnome.org, so I removed
it from his account.
OK, I successfully managed to shut myself up and just move along a few
SA3.3.0, just a general question, I've noticed that over the past six
days that during my 01:11 sa-update cronjob that the complete default
rulesets are being updated. The file names are in fact changing,
ie..922182.tar.gz, 922507.tar.gz and so forth, just curious as to why
the daily changes when
On 19/03/2010 2:34 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 3/19/10 12:31 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
Release Notes -- Apache SpamAssassin -- Version 3.3.1
I clicked on the download and got redirected (hijacked)? to this site:
On 19/03/2010 8:34 PM, Chris wrote:
SA3.3.0, just a general question, I've noticed that over the past six
days that during my 01:11 sa-update cronjob that the complete default
rulesets are being updated. The file names are in fact changing,
ie..922182.tar.gz, 922507.tar.gz and so forth, just
I'm not sure that's accurate. Did you get that link from our download
page today?
yes, I did.
The site seems to still be an Apache mirror, it just hasn't updated yet,
AFAICS.
then someone needs to unauthorize them. its a parking page, someone
lost that hostname and someone else
54 matches
Mail list logo
