Re: spamd[18549]: config: failed to parse line, skipping, in "/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf": use_auto_whitelist 1

On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote: > On man 03 maj 2010 07:51:01 CEST, ram wrote > > this is my output >> > > super > > > May 3 11:19:22.416 [621] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping, in > "/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf": use_auto_whitelist 1 > > remove that "use_aut

Re: odd FPs

Peter Alfredsen writes: > [I don't remember if this address is subscribed, so CCing Greg directly] > On Tue, 04 May 2010 15:44:33 -0400 > Greg Troxel wrote: > >> >> I use spamassass-milter and reject at about 8 points. > [...] >> UNPARSEABLE_RELAY > > That test has a habit of firing with spama

Re: [sa] odd FPs

Karsten Bräckelmann writes: > On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 17:37 -0400, Greg Troxel wrote: >> Karsten Bräckelmann writes: > >> > Translations of the rules? An Outlook user submitted directly to your MX >> > without using his own SMTP. The SMTP HELO looks bad. The mail has been >> > submitted from an I

Re: [sa] odd FPs

On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 17:37 -0400, Greg Troxel wrote: > Karsten Bräckelmann writes: > > Translations of the rules? An Outlook user submitted directly to your MX > > without using his own SMTP. The SMTP HELO looks bad. The mail has been > > submitted from an IP, that's not supposed to do this: It'

Re: [sa] odd FPs

Karsten Bräckelmann writes: > On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 15:48 -0400, Charles Gregory wrote: >> On Tue, 4 May 2010, Greg Troxel wrote: >> > I use spamassass-milter and reject at about 8 points. Normally this is >> > fine. I just got a few false positives. > >> > DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX,HELO_NO_DOMAIN,RCV

Re: [sa] odd FPs

On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 15:48 -0400, Charles Gregory wrote: > On Tue, 4 May 2010, Greg Troxel wrote: > > I use spamassass-milter and reject at about 8 points. Normally this is > > fine. I just got a few false positives. > > DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX,HELO_NO_DOMAIN,RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_NONE

Re: [sa] odd FPs

On Tue, 4 May 2010, Greg Troxel wrote: I use spamassass-milter and reject at about 8 points. Normally this is fine. I just got a few false positives. BAYES_40,DKIM_FORGED,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX,HELO_NO_DOMAIN,RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_R

odd FPs

I use spamassass-milter and reject at about 8 points. Normally this is fine. I just got a few false positives. One message got 10.9 points (from earthlink, from an earthlink user). DKIM_FORGED is my own rule and wrong, now fixed, for 2 points, but that's 8.9 points still. I don't understand w

should a BLANK subject be the same as missing subject?

Have an email, Subject: header exists, but is blank (not even a space after the :) but the MISSING_SUBJECT rule does not trigger. should it? I have seen a couple of these in the past. so far, all spam. (running sa 3.3.1 with latest rules) it triggers ,__HAS_SUBJECT,_ so, it won't trigger MI

RE: Short Circuiting

> > Make sure the plugin is loaded. Uncomment a line that looks > something like this in your v*.pre files: > > loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Shortcircuit > > I think that was my problem right there. I found the "loadplugin" line in the v320.pre file. Thanks for your help Jared. Ka

Re: Short Circuiting

Make sure the plugin is loaded. Uncomment a line that looks something like this in your v*.pre files: loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Shortcircuit Kaleb Hosie wrote: > I'm hoping that maybe someone here can help me figure out what I'm missing. > I'm trying to enable short circuiting on

Short Circuiting

I'm hoping that maybe someone here can help me figure out what I'm missing. I'm trying to enable short circuiting on our configuration but it doesn't seem to work. I've uncommented the short circuiting on BAYES_99 and restarted the service but it doesn't seem to help. Any recommendations? Than