It's the same issue as was already resolved for the ClamAV plugin,
the data structure changed from hash to a list (so that ordering
of add_header can be maintained).
See:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6254
Ah, thank you. I made this change in POPAuth.pm at
Hello,
Can you tell it's Friday afternoon? What should be a simple problem
always seems to become a nightmare on Friday afternoons! :-)
Using SA 3.3.1 I have the following simple rule:
body LOCAL_JH /userid:\s*\n/i
which should look for 'userid:', any number of spaces and then a NL
On 2010-05-21 15:40, John Horne wrote:
Hello,
Can you tell it's Friday afternoon? What should be a simple problem
always seems to become a nightmare on Friday afternoons! :-)
Using SA 3.3.1 I have the following simple rule:
body LOCAL_JH /userid:\s*\n/i
which should look for
On Fri, 21 May 2010, John Horne wrote:
Hello,
Can you tell it's Friday afternoon? What should be a simple problem
always seems to become a nightmare on Friday afternoons! :-)
Using SA 3.3.1 I have the following simple rule:
body LOCAL_JH /userid:\s*\n/i
which should look for
Hi, I have a problem with some mails that are discarded when in body message
there is a web link with http prefix, i.e. with:
http://www.example.com/example
with this link the mail is discarded and in log file I have:
[r...@mail ~]# grep 707F026A302 /var/log/maillog
May 20 10:52:16 mail
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Mark Martinec mark.martinec...@ijs.si wrote:
It's the same issue as was already resolved for the ClamAV plugin,
the data structure changed from hash to a list (so that ordering
of add_header can be maintained).
See:
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 15:51 +0200, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
On 2010-05-21 15:40, John Horne wrote:
If I send a message containing:
some textNL
userid: NL
some more text
...
Can someone show me how to match a newline character in the above rule
please?
can you post a
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 06:53 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 21 May 2010, John Horne wrote:
Hello,
Can you tell it's Friday afternoon? What should be a simple problem
always seems to become a nightmare on Friday afternoons! :-)
Using SA 3.3.1 I have the following simple rule:
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 21:34 -0400, Robert Palmer wrote:
yum install insisted I have current version so I used cpan which got me
to 3.3.1. Should I stop there or consider 3.3.2 or 3.4.x?
http://spamassassin.apache.org/
Did you have a look there, yet? 3.3.1 is the latest stable release.
3.3.2
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 15:58 +0200, Sasa wrote:
Hi, I have a problem with some mails that are discarded when in body message
there is a web link with http prefix, i.e. with:
http://www.example.com/example
with this link the mail is discarded and in log file I have:
You didn't show *any*
I'm using spamassassin with sendmail via spamass-milter. Many users are
using Open Webmail to read mail, and sometimes when they try to send, the
system hangs for 10+ seconds. Often it sends immediately however.
When I setup the system, I remember reading somewhere that it might be a
good idea
I'm using spamassassin with sendmail via spamass-milter.
Many users are using Open Webmail to read mail, and sometimes
when they try to send, the system hangs for 10+ seconds.
Often it sends immediately however.
I would start with examining your maillog (/var/log/maillog). If that
Does anyone know where the setting for max-children is?
If I run 'ps aux | grep spam' I can see:
That spamd is run like so:
/usr/sbin/spamd --create-prefs --max-children 2 --helper-home-dir -d
--pidfile=/var/run/spamd.pid
However, I do not see where to specify max-children in any
Does anyone know where the setting for max-children is?
If I run 'ps aux | grep spam' I can see:
That spamd is run like so:
/usr/sbin/spamd --create-prefs --max-children 2
--helper-home-dir -d --pidfile=/var/run/spamd.pid
However, I do not see where to specify max-children in any
Ok, I did a broader search using:
cat `locate spamass | grep etc` | grep child
Turns out it's in /etc/defaults/spamassassin
I'm using Debian. Now the question is, will restoring maxchildren from 2
back to 5 help the problem? I will have to wait and see.
--
View this message in context:
I'm using Debian. Now the question is, will restoring
maxchildren from 2 back to 5 help the problem? I will have
to wait and see.
One way of telling whether this is the problem or not is to search your
maillog for an entry like the following:
Apr 27 05:59:45 mailgate spamd[23853]:
I'm using spamassassin with sendmail via spamass-milter. Many users are
using Open Webmail to read mail, and sometimes when they try to send, the
system hangs for 10+ seconds. Often it sends immediately however.
You are scanning outgoing messages. Is this really a requirement?
If not, You
Sure enough, that error message is in the /var/log/mail.log file several
times a day. I think this may be the problem I was having. The limit is
now 5 so hopefully this will happen very infrequently now and perhaps it
will solve the problem.
Kaleb Hosie wrote:
I'm using Debian. Now the
Hi all,
I am constantly getting the server reached --max children setting entries in my
log
I started with 10 max children and have been raising it by 2. I am now at 40
, but still getting the messages (though not as often) how high can I go given
these specs:
sa 3.3 on freebsd ,
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
Hi all,
I am constantly getting the server reached --max children setting entries in
my log
I started with 10 max children and have been raising it by 2. I am now at
40 , but still getting the messages (though not as often) how high can I go
given these
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 15:37 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
I am constantly getting the server reached --max children setting
entries in my log
I started with 10 max children and have been raising it by 2. I am
now at 40 , but still getting the messages (though not
Hi all,
I am constantly getting the server reached --max children setting entries
in my log
I started with 10 max children and have been raising it by 2. I am now at
40 , but still getting the messages (though not as often) how high can I
go given these specs:
sa 3.3 on freebsd ,
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
Just accept the fact that mail gets into a queue when using processes like
SA. If outgoing spam is not a concern, set your system so that outbound
mail is not passed thru SA.
I actually only use the exim/sa as incoming filter, I do not send through it.
The
On Fri, 21 May 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
Hi all,
I am constantly getting the server reached --max children setting entries
in my log
I started with 10 max children and have been raising it by 2. I am now at
40 , but still getting the messages (though not
Michael Scheidell mused:
would adding 1 point for each 1K of header length help?
J.D. Falk responded:
Interesting idea! I don't know the precise semantics of the
contents of that header, but this certainly sounds possible.
Seconded.
I don't think this is efficient at all (I'm leaning on no
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 17:43 -0400, Adam Katz wrote:
header SINGLE_HEADER_2K ALL:raw =~ /^(?=.{2048,3071}$)/m
It does not match a single header, let alone a *specific* header as the
one mentioned, but ALL headers. It effectively checks the entire
headers' size.
As I understood it, the desired
On Fri, 21 May 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
Hi all,
I am constantly getting the server reached --max children setting entries
in my log
I started with 10 max children and have been raising it by 2. I am now at
40 , but still getting the messages (though
On Sat, 2010-05-22 at 00:13 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 17:43 -0400, Adam Katz wrote:
header SINGLE_HEADER_2K ALL:raw =~ /^(?=.{2048,3071}$)/m
It does not match a single header, let alone a *specific* header as the
one mentioned, but ALL headers. It
On 5/21/10 7:35 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Sat, 2010-05-22 at 00:13 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 17:43 -0400, Adam Katz wrote:
header SINGLE_HEADER_2K ALL:raw =~ /^(?=.{2048,3071}$)/m
It does not match a single header, let alone a
On Fri, 21 May 2010 16:50:32 -0400
Bowie Bailey bowie_bai...@buc.com wrote:
The reason I was trying to tweak it, maybe I'm going about it
wrong, but spamd winds up timing out a lot. Then people call and
say there messages were not delivered or delayed etc...
That may be a consequence
On Fri, 21 May 2010, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
On Fri, 21 May 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
Hi all,
I am constantly getting the server reached --max children setting entries
in my log
I started with 10 max children and have been raising it by 2. I am now
31 matches
Mail list logo
