Dear sirs,
I am new to this list, So I hope I have the right email address.
I am running a Blue Quartz with spamassassin pre installed. I don't know the
version. I have run the gtube test and it works fine for my admin email
account, it is marking them as spam. but it is marking any of emails
nonlin wrote:
I am running a Blue Quartz with spamassassin pre installed. I don't know
the version. I have run the gtube test and it works fine for my admin
email account, it is marking them as spam. but it is marking any of emails
for my clients, yet there are several files like the
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 19:24 -0700, jdow wrote:
From: Martin Gregorie mar...@gregorie.org
Sent: Monday, 2010/August/09 18:08
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 17:42 -0700, jdow wrote:
From: Martin Gregorie mar...@gregorie.org
Something like this will match a sequence of two capitalised name
Sorry about that I just simply pressed reply, I expected the reply to have
sent my message back to us...@spamassassin.apache.org. So I had to use
forward instead.
anyway, I will start to look into it. but before I do, you said something
that made me think you might have slightly miss understood
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:55:45 -0400
Dennis German dger...@real-world-systems.com wrote:
On Jul 22, 2010, at 10:47 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:...
due to performance vs accuracy issues, AWL was demoted in SA 3.3x.
Can you please define demoted.
It's no longer
On 8/10/2010 7:55 PM, Dennis German wrote:
On Jul 22, 2010, at 10:47 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:...
due to performance vs accuracy issues, AWL was demoted in SA 3.3x.
Can you please define demoted.
Changed from enabled by default to disabled by default,
Please keep threads on-list, unless you specifically want to talk to me.
Even boring end-of-line posts are worthwhile information to the full
thread.
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 18:43 +0200, Andreas Dunkl wrote:
Am 10.08.2010 13:42, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
Well, that one paragraph isn't a good
Hi,
How does DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS work? I have a system where every message
triggers on DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS and I can't figure out why.
I had some problems with the headers being mangled, but I was pretty
sure that was fixed. Could this be a postfix or amavisd configuration?
I did notice this one
I was looking through some of the spam rules, and I noticed that the
JM_SOUGHT_FRAUD rules are included in the main SA updates channel for SA
3.3.1, but the scores are all 0. Is there a reason for this?
The rules from the sought channel have scores, but they are being
overridden by the main
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 10:58 -0400, Alex wrote:
How does DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS work? I have a system where every message
triggers on DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS and I can't figure out why.
Bug 6157 [1], remove open-whois.org rules since domain is cybersquatted.
The rule has been removed a *year* ago, and
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 17:24 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 10:58 -0400, Alex wrote:
How does DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS work? I have a system where every message
triggers on DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS and I can't figure out why.
Bug 6157 [1], remove open-whois.org rules since
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 10:59 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
I was looking through some of the spam rules, and I noticed that the
JM_SOUGHT_FRAUD rules are included in the main SA updates channel for SA
3.3.1, but the scores are all 0. Is there a reason for this?
Yes, an explicit request by Justin
Bug 6157 [1], remove open-whois.org rules since domain is cybersquatted.
The rule has been removed a *year* ago, and is neither part of 3.3, nor
3.2 stock rules.
Forgot to mention: After running sa-update WRT 3.2.
Great, thanks so much.
Best,
Alex
On 8/11/2010 11:46 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 10:59 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
I was looking through some of the spam rules, and I noticed that the
JM_SOUGHT_FRAUD rules are included in the main SA updates channel for SA
3.3.1, but the scores are all 0. Is there a
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 11:51 -0400, Alex wrote:
Bug 6157 [1], remove open-whois.org rules since domain is cybersquatted.
The rule has been removed a *year* ago, and is neither part of 3.3, nor
3.2 stock rules.
Forgot to mention: After running sa-update WRT 3.2.
Great, thanks so
Hi,
Forgot to mention: After running sa-update WRT 3.2.
Great, thanks so much.
Well, you *did* run sa-update since then, no? I mean, at the very least
early this year. Begs the question, why you still do have that rule.
It's another system that I just adopted, and haven't finished
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 11:57 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 8/11/2010 11:46 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 10:59 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
I was looking through some of the spam rules, and I noticed that the
JM_SOUGHT_FRAUD rules are included in the main SA updates
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Alex mysqlstud...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I did notice this one header discrepancy:
Received: by mail.mydomain.net (Postfix, from userid 78)
What's with the Postfix, from user 78)? This should be the server's
IP address, no?
That header is normal when you're
On 8/11/2010 12:17 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 11:57 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 8/11/2010 11:46 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 10:59 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
I was looking through some of the spam rules, and I noticed that the
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 07:48:11 -0400
Matt Kettler mkettler...@verizon.net wrote:
1) lack of expiry process causes unbounded database growth. There's a
script to clean out single-hit entries, but multi-hit persist
forever, even when stale. (there are no timestamps on entries, so
expiry isn't
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 18:30:17 +0100
RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 07:48:11 -0400
Matt Kettler mkettler...@verizon.net wrote:
1) lack of expiry process causes unbounded database growth. There's
a script to clean out single-hit entries, but multi-hit persist
We are currently running SA v3.3.1 on Solaris 9 and Solaris 10 and are planning
to move to Red Hat. I don't have much experience with Red Hat (or Linux in
general). Could you point me to some tips and documentation about installing
and running SA on Red Hat?
FYI, on Solaris I install by
Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
We are currently running SA v3.3.1 on Solaris 9 and Solaris 10 and are
planning to move to Red Hat. I don’t have much experience with Red Hat
(or Linux in general). Could you point me to some tips and
documentation about installing and running SA on Red Hat?
On ons 11 aug 2010 19:35:35 CEST, RW wrote
That should be count/total-score not count/token.
total-score/count
will also work with mask of 0.0.0.0/8 ?
sa below 3.3.x had it hardcoded to /16
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
On 8/11/2010 3:30 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Right. And I'm checking for updates several times a day. If the
updates channel is not keeping up with sought, I need to make sure I
am running the rules from the dedicated channel and not the updates
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 22:26:31 +0200
Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org wrote:
On ons 11 aug 2010 19:35:35 CEST, RW wrote
That should be count/total-score not count/token.
total-score/count
I actually meant it in the sense of a-stroke-b rather than
a-divided-by-b
will also work with mask
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:30:40 -0400
Bowie Bailey bowie_bai...@buc.com wrote:
On 8/11/2010 3:30 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Right. And I'm checking for updates several times a day. If the
updates channel is not keeping up with sought, I need to make
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:30:40 -0400 Bowie Bailey bowie_bai...@buc.com wrote:
On 8/11/2010 3:30 PM, John Hardin wrote:
The current situation is: automatic rule updates are only generated
when the corpa of recent messages used in the nightly masscheck is
sufficiently large (150k+ of
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 17:30 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
In case anyone else is following this...
The sa-update process made things a bit more complex than simply
renaming the file after updates. If that's all you do, then sa-update
loses track of the file and will download a new copy on
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
In case anyone else is following this...
The sa-update process made things a bit more complex than simply
renaming the file after updates. If that's all you do, then sa-update
loses track of the file and will download a new copy on every run.
What I
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, RW wrote:
1) Rename the .cf file back to the original name so sa-update can
find it
2) Run sa-update
3) Rename the .cf file to z_sought_rules_yerp_org.cf
4) Restart spamd
Would it not be simpler just to do something like this
grep -E ^score
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Karsten Br?ckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 17:30 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
In case anyone else is following this...
The sa-update process made things a bit more complex than simply
renaming the file after updates. If that's all you do, then sa-update
loses track
On 8/11/2010 1:30 PM, RW wrote:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 07:48:11 -0400
Matt Kettlermkettler...@verizon.net wrote:
1) lack of expiry process causes unbounded database growth. There's a
script to clean out single-hit entries, but multi-hit persist
forever, even when stale. (there are no timestamps
Well I am not out of the Dog House yet.
So, by some miracle I was able to get yum to work and was able to use it to
update Spamassassion. I was so happy because this was the safest way to do
this. But yum didn't have ver 3.3 available so I was able to update to:
SpamAssassin version 3.2.4
34 matches
Mail list logo
