All,
Has anyone come up with a ruleset yet to score against the new spamhaus
whitelists, and deduct points appropriately?
-Dan
--
Let me tell you something about regrowing your dead wife Lucy, Harry.
It's probably illegal, potentially dangerous, and definitely crazy.
-Harry nods-
Vincent
On 11/5/2010 11:40 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
All,
Has anyone come up with a ruleset yet to score against the new spamhaus
whitelists, and deduct points appropriately?
You could try something like:
header SPAMHAUS_SWL eval:check_rbl('SPAMHAUS_SWL', 'swl.spamhaus.org.')
describe
On 11/6/2010 12:19 AM, Bill Landry wrote:
On 11/5/2010 11:40 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
All,
Has anyone come up with a ruleset yet to score against the new spamhaus
whitelists, and deduct points appropriately?
You could try something like:
header SPAMHAUS_SWL
On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 00:41:53 -0700
Bill Landry b...@inetmsg.com wrote:
You could also test the envelope sender:
header SPAMHAUS_ENV eval:check_rbl_envfrom('SPAMHAUS_ENV',
'_vouch.dwl.spamhaus.org.')
But that's an abuse... you should not be using Vouch-by-reference unless
either DKIM
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Pat Traynor wrote:
I've been running Spamassassin on my linux server for some time, and I
use Pine to read my mail.
Hello, fellow fossil!
Aah, yonder fossils. I've found, by the way, that if you're not using
Alpine, you sure
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 00:41:53 -0700
Bill Landry b...@inetmsg.com wrote:
You could also test the envelope sender:
header SPAMHAUS_ENV eval:check_rbl_envfrom('SPAMHAUS_ENV',
'_vouch.dwl.spamhaus.org.')
But that's an abuse... you should not be
Hello,
I run into a problem calling sa-learn from mutt. This problem was
reported at least two times in the past, but no solution to it
was posted:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200406.mbox/%3c20040611085128.gc14...@kassi.oddi.is%3e
--On Saturday, November 6, 2010 2:40 AM -0400 Dan Mahoney, System Admin
d...@prime.gushi.org wrote:
All,
Has anyone come up with a ruleset yet to score against the new spamhaus
whitelists, and deduct points appropriately?
-Dan
Has a paying customer got an answer from Spamhaus about an
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
2) While John's methods for learning and reporting spam work, I've found that
the best way to do it is per-message within spamassassin, via spamd/spamc.
The pipe command returns MUCH faster in this config.
Interactively moving the messages
- Joseph Brennan bren...@columbia.edu wrote:
--On Saturday, November 6, 2010 2:40 AM -0400 Dan Mahoney, System
Admin
d...@prime.gushi.org wrote:
All,
Has anyone come up with a ruleset yet to score against the new
spamhaus
whitelists, and deduct points appropriately?
-Dan
On 11/06, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Has anyone come up with a ruleset yet to score against the new
spamhaus whitelists, and deduct points appropriately?
Thanks for mentioning it. This is based on the DNSWL rules and linted and
loaded, but only seconds ago, so not tested, please
On 11/6/2010 12:50 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 00:41:53 -0700
Bill Landryb...@inetmsg.com wrote:
You could also test the envelope sender:
header SPAMHAUS_ENV eval:check_rbl_envfrom('SPAMHAUS_ENV',
'_vouch.dwl.spamhaus.org.')
But that's an abuse... you should not
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 16:17:43 +0100
Oliver Block oliver_blo...@web.de wrote:
Hello,
I run into a problem calling sa-learn from mutt. This problem was
reported at least two times in the past, but no solution to it
was posted:
On 11/6/10 3:19 AM, Bill Landry wrote:
On 11/5/2010 11:40 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
All,
Has anyone come up with a ruleset yet to score against the new spamhaus
whitelists, and deduct points appropriately?
You could try something like:
don't forget the tflag 'noautolearn' since
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 16:17 +0100, Oliver Block wrote:
I am experiencing the same problem. I was calling sa-learn as follows:
Since you didn't include the actual output, I assume by experiencing
the same you also mean the same sa-learn result? Like this.
Learned from 0 message(s) (4
Oliver Block wrote:
But of course it is annoying to wait for sa-learn to finish each time.
What I do is save the spam message to a spam-incoming maildir folder.
Then I have a separate cron job that runs frequently looking for
messages appearing in that folder. When it finds messages it handles
16 matches
Mail list logo
