Re: Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/CompiledRegexps/body_0.pm in @INC

2011-04-05 Thread Marco Beishuizen
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Michael Scheidell wrote: did you reload spamd, restart spamd? when you recompile the rules, you need to tell spamd to reload. did this used to work before you upgraded to perl 5.12? When spamd restarts I also get: ... Stopping spamd. Waiting for PIDS: 9064. Starting spamd.

Re: Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/CompiledRegexps/body_0.pm in @INC

2011-04-05 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 4/5/11 3:28 PM, Marco Beishuizen wrote: On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Michael Scheidell wrote: did you reload spamd, restart spamd? when you recompile the rules, you need to tell spamd to reload. did this used to work before you upgraded to perl 5.12? Yes I recompiled and restarted spamd. I think

Re: Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/CompiledRegexps/body_0.pm in @INC

2011-04-05 Thread Marco Beishuizen
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Michael Scheidell wrote: did you reload spamd, restart spamd? when you recompile the rules, you need to tell spamd to reload. did this used to work before you upgraded to perl 5.12? Yes I recompiled and restarted spamd. I think I have this error for a long time, also with

Re: Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/CompiledRegexps/body_0.pm in @INC

2011-04-05 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 4/5/11 3:17 PM, Marco Beishuizen wrote: On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Michael Scheidell wrote: just 'sa-compile' make sure it completes. do a 'spamassassin --lint' to make sure you don't have any rules that won't compile. also, AFTER you compile the rules, you have to restart spamd. I already

Re: Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/CompiledRegexps/body_0.pm in @INC

2011-04-05 Thread Marco Beishuizen
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Michael Scheidell wrote: just 'sa-compile' make sure it completes. do a 'spamassassin --lint' to make sure you don't have any rules that won't compile. also, AFTER you compile the rules, you have to restart spamd. I already ran sa-compile twice, and didn't get any error

Re: Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/CompiledRegexps/body_0.pm in @INC

2011-04-05 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 4/5/11 3:01 PM, Marco Beishuizen wrote: On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Michael Scheidell wrote: spamd[1353]: Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/CompiledRegexps/body_0.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /var/db/spamassassin/compiled/5.012/3.003001 /var/db/spamassassin/compiled/5.012/3.003001/auto /usr/local/lib

Re: Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/CompiledRegexps/body_0.pm in @INC

2011-04-05 Thread Marco Beishuizen
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Michael Scheidell wrote: spamd[1353]: Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/CompiledRegexps/body_0.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /var/db/spamassassin/compiled/5.012/3.003001 /var/db/spamassassin/compiled/5.012/3.003001/auto /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.12.3 you need to compile t

Re: Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/CompiledRegexps/body_0.pm in @INC

2011-04-05 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 4/5/11 2:52 PM, Marco Beishuizen wrote: After some googling, I reinstalled SA, and ran sa-compile again but the message stays. I'm running SA on FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE and sendmail. if you are NOT running the ports version, then SA might put the files in the wrong place. I am the ports mainta

Re: Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/CompiledRegexps/body_0.pm in @INC

2011-04-05 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 4/5/11 2:52 PM, Marco Beishuizen wrote: ... spamd[1353]: Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/CompiledRegexps/body_0.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /var/db/spamassassin/compiled/5.012/3.003001 /var/db/spamassassin/compiled/5.012/3.003001/auto /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.12.3 you need to compil

Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/CompiledRegexps/body_0.pm in @INC

2011-04-05 Thread Marco Beishuizen
Hi, For a long time I'm getting the above message when spamd is started. All seems to work fine so I never tried to repair it, but since it is an error message I was wondering what the problem is. The full message is: ... spamd[1353]: Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/CompiledRegexps/body_0.pm i

Re: mail spam not catched

2011-04-05 Thread Yet Another Ninja
On 2011-04-05 17:44, Salvatore wrote: For to stop this spam I must modify my spamassassin configuration ? What steps I can make for to resolve my problem ? Thanks and sorry for my banal question. Thanks in advance. help us help you and post the sample in http://pastebin.com

RE: mail spam not catched

2011-04-05 Thread Salvatore
For to stop this spam I must modify my spamassassin configuration ? What steps I can make for to resolve my problem ? Thanks and sorry for my banal question. Thanks in advance. - Salvatore. > -Original Message- > From: Benny Pedersen [mailto:m...@junc.org] > Sent: Tuesday, April 05,

Re: mail spam not catched

2011-04-05 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 16:41:54 +0200, "Salvatore" wrote: > Return-Path: very well forged > X-PHP-Script: multiform.at/sendmail.php for 212.231.242.16 php script on public hostname > Return-Path: +all in spf http://old.openspf.org/wizard.html?mydomain=bankofdeerfield.com

Re: mail spam not catched

2011-04-05 Thread John Hardin
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Salvatore wrote: Hello, from a few days I receive spam and this spam mail have a more low hits, I use spamassassin with postfix/amavisd-new/maia: The spams have ho body? Please post the entire spam(s), body plus _all_ headers, to a website you control or to someplace like

Re: Current NEWESTA mail

2011-04-05 Thread John Hardin
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Mynabbler wrote: We are chickenpoxed in the current incarnation, but the chickenpox filter is giving way too many false positives. Maybe the chickenpox rules need to be reincarnated as __subrules so they can be meta'd with things like FREEMAIL_FROM... Are Jennifer Wheele

mail spam not catched

2011-04-05 Thread Salvatore
Hello, from a few days I receive spam and this spam mail have a more low hits, I use spamassassin with postfix/amavisd-new/maia: Return-Path: .. Received: from localhost (mail [127.0.0.1]) by mail.myserver.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2A12D4001; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 19:57:41 +0200 (CE

Current NEWESTA mail

2011-04-05 Thread Mynabbler
Does someone feel like giving the next incarnation of the Russian bride crap a decent score? Send by Yahoo, of course, and my previous generation filter is useless against it. By the way, the previous filter was: body NEWESTA /You will see some of my private (?:photos|photographs|pictures|pics)|

Re: RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL on my own emails to self

2011-04-05 Thread rstarkov
> You should use SMTP authentication when posting through your SMTP > server.i guess you are not. > (And the SMTP server should not be on dynamic IP, of course) I am using SMTP authentication, and it's on a static IP. It's the PC with my Thunderbird that's on a dynamic IP. > The dynamic checks

Re: RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL on my own emails to self

2011-04-05 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> > your IP isn't backlisted. It's listed as a DUL, which is correct: [...] > > You'll have to use a smarthost or get a static/business connection. On 05.04.11 03:29, rstarkov wrote: > I'm not sure I understand this bit. From what I see on > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_host, I already use

Re: RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL on my own emails to self

2011-04-05 Thread rstarkov
> your IP isn't backlisted. It's listed as a DUL, which is correct: OK, right, that makes sense. > You'll have to use a smarthost or get a static/business connection. I'm not sure I understand this bit. From what I see on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_host, I already use a "smart host", in

Re: RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL on my own emails to self

2011-04-05 Thread Yet Another Ninja
On 2011-04-05 12:08, rstarkov wrote: Like so many people, I get a dynamic IP from my ISP. Right now, any emails I send to myself show up as "RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL". Somehow I thought that as long as my SMTP server isn't blacklisted, something like this wouldn't happen. The exact message is: RCVD_IN

RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL on my own emails to self

2011-04-05 Thread rstarkov
Like so many people, I get a dynamic IP from my ISP. Right now, any emails I send to myself show up as "RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL". Somehow I thought that as long as my SMTP server isn't blacklisted, something like this wouldn't happen. The exact message is: RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly fr

Re: DNSWL rules downscoring spam

2011-04-05 Thread Andrzej Adam Filip
Pasi Hirvonen wrote: > I just recently moved our mail setup to new hardware and I've been > paying close attention to what gets marked as spam and what > doesn't. > > Looking at my spam folder, I have received roughly 550 spam emails > to my email account since last tuesday (15th). Out of those 55

Re: DNSWL abuse reports by domain, over time

2011-04-05 Thread Andrzej Adam Filip
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: > Top 20, linear Y scale: > http://www.chaosreigns.com/dnswl/dnswlabusehistory.svg > > Top 10, logarithmic Y scale: > http://www.chaosreigns.com/dnswl/dnswlabusehistory_log.svg > [...] Could you create chart with number of reports instead of percent of reports? AFAIK