Re: Am i sending spam?

2011-12-23 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter
* Lars Ebeling : > >You are not sending spam. Someone on the machine SR1S4.mesa.gmu.edu > >[129.174.112.124 connected to your machine and said: > > > >HELO leopg9.no-ip.org > > > >In other words, the HELO domain was faked. We automatically block mail > >from anyone who HELOs as our machine (unles

Re: Am i sending spam?

2011-12-23 Thread David B Funk
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, David F. Skoll wrote: On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 23:13:43 +0100 "Lars Ebeling" wrote: We automatically block mail from anyone who HELOs as our machine (unless it really *is* from our machine, of course!) how do you do that? We use MIMEDefang which lets you code tests like t

Re: Am i sending spam?

2011-12-23 Thread Larry Rosenman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/23/2011 4:23 PM, David F. Skoll wrote: > On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 23:13:43 +0100 "Lars Ebeling" > wrote: > >>> We automatically block mail from anyone who HELOs as our >>> machine (unless it really *is* from our machine, of course!) > >> how do you

Re: Am i sending spam?

2011-12-23 Thread David F. Skoll
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 23:13:43 +0100 "Lars Ebeling" wrote: > > We automatically block mail from anyone who HELOs as our machine > > (unless it really *is* from our machine, of course!) > how do you do that? We use MIMEDefang which lets you code tests like that in Perl. (So this is done outside of

Re: Am i sending spam?

2011-12-23 Thread Lars Ebeling
- Original Message - From: "David F. Skoll" To: Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 10:14 PM Subject: Re: Am i sending spam? On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 22:10:22 +0100 "Lars Ebeling" wrote: http://pastebin.com/78gUdaCj You are not sending spam. Someone on the machine SR1S4.mesa.gmu.edu [

Re: Am i sending spam?

2011-12-23 Thread David B Funk
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, David B Funk wrote: On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, David F. Skoll wrote: On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 22:10:22 +0100 "Lars Ebeling" wrote: http://pastebin.com/78gUdaCj You are not sending spam. Someone on the machine SR1S4.mesa.gmu.edu [129.174.112.124 connected to your machine and sai

Re: Am i sending spam?

2011-12-23 Thread David B Funk
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, David F. Skoll wrote: On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 22:10:22 +0100 "Lars Ebeling" wrote: http://pastebin.com/78gUdaCj You are not sending spam. Someone on the machine SR1S4.mesa.gmu.edu [129.174.112.124 connected to your machine and said: HELO leopg9.no-ip.org In other

Re: Am i sending spam?

2011-12-23 Thread David F. Skoll
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 22:10:22 +0100 "Lars Ebeling" wrote: > http://pastebin.com/78gUdaCj You are not sending spam. Someone on the machine SR1S4.mesa.gmu.edu [129.174.112.124 connected to your machine and said: HELO leopg9.no-ip.org In other words, the HELO domain was faked. We automat

Am i sending spam?

2011-12-23 Thread Lars Ebeling
http://pastebin.com/78gUdaCj -- Med vänliga hälsningar/Regards Lars Ebeling Rentier http://leopg9.no-ip.org "I am not young enough to know everything." -- Oscar Wilde

Re: dccproc/dccifd error

2011-12-23 Thread Michael Scheidell
I am going to update the original bug with patch. Ill have mark look at it first. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO SECNAP Network Security -Original message- From: "dar...@chaosreigns.com" To: Michael Scheidell Cc: "users@spamassassin.apache.org" Sent: Fri, Dec 23, 2011 17:28:28 GMT+00:00 S

Re: dccproc/dccifd error

2011-12-23 Thread darxus
On 12/23, Michael Scheidell wrote: > #2, bug.. yep, bug. Vernon (author of DCC) will investigate and fix > it, and update the SA BUGzilla soon. > (so, yes, this would be a bug in 3.4 if released, but only shows up > under one certain condition) Please post the bug to https://issues.apache.org/Spa

Re: Bayes and MySQL - does it actually work?

2011-12-23 Thread John Hardin
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, spamassas...@lists.grepular.com wrote: On 23/12/11 14:25, David F. Skoll wrote: The only downside to CDB is that incremental updates are not possible. To train, you need to rebuild the entire CDB file. For us, that's an acceptable tradeoff, but YMMV. Another major downs

Re: Bayes and MySQL - does it actually work?

2011-12-23 Thread Henrik K
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 03:03:09PM +, spamassas...@lists.grepular.com wrote: > On 23/12/11 14:20, Henrik K wrote: > > >> As I understand it, if the MySQL query cache is tuned appropriately, > >> then most of the queries should not be touching disk anyway? > > > > Enabling query cache will pro

Re: Bayes and MySQL - does it actually work?

2011-12-23 Thread David F. Skoll
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 15:05:42 + spamassas...@lists.grepular.com wrote: > Another major downside to this approach compared to using MySQL, is > that it doesn't allow you to access the same bayes db from multiple > machines at the same time. Unless I'm mistaken..? You're correct. We rsync the C

Re: Bayes and MySQL - does it actually work?

2011-12-23 Thread spamassassin
On 23/12/11 14:25, David F. Skoll wrote: > The only downside to CDB is that incremental updates are not possible. > To train, you need to rebuild the entire CDB file. For us, that's > an acceptable tradeoff, but YMMV. Another major downside to this approach compared to using MySQL, is that it do

Re: Bayes and MySQL - does it actually work?

2011-12-23 Thread spamassassin
On 23/12/11 14:20, Henrik K wrote: >> As I understand it, if the MySQL query cache is tuned appropriately, >> then most of the queries should not be touching disk anyway? > > Enabling query cache will probably (marginally) slow things down. Bayes > queries are extremely random, so there's nothing

Re: Bayes and MySQL - does it actually work?

2011-12-23 Thread David F. Skoll
I don't believe any kind of SQL database is the best choice for Bayes (which involves simple keyed lookups). We use Dan Bernsteins "cdb" file format with great success. Each user has his or her own CDB file as well as a sitewide file containing 5.7 million tokens. The CDB software uses mmap() to

Re: Bayes and MySQL - does it actually work?

2011-12-23 Thread Henrik K
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 02:10:16PM +, spamassas...@lists.grepular.com wrote: > On 23/12/11 11:29, Henrik K wrote: > > >> Performance with the database on physical disks simply wasn't > >> keeping up with more than about double the average message rate (if > >> that...), so I fell back to the "

Re: Bayes and MySQL - does it actually work?

2011-12-23 Thread spamassassin
On 23/12/11 11:29, Henrik K wrote: >> Performance with the database on physical disks simply wasn't >> keeping up with more than about double the average message rate (if >> that...), so I fell back to the "good enough" setup of putting the >> SA database on a RAMdisk, > I guess it still boils do

Re: dccproc/dccifd error

2011-12-23 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 12/22/11 9:44 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: On 12/22, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: The author did say "I believe it is entirely upward compatible." in November, which was well after the DCC 1.3.140 release, so it probably works. I'd be interested to hear how that works if you try it. Mi

Re: Bayes and MySQL - does it actually work?

2011-12-23 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 13:29:00 +0200, Henrik K wrote: Since these issues pop up here every now and then, I guess SA needs own tutorial/howto for MySQL tuning.. google mysqltuner was a help for me even i have not much trafic here http://www.google.dk/search?aq=f&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=mysql

Re: Bayes and MySQL - does it actually work?

2011-12-23 Thread Henrik K
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 01:10:27PM -0500, Kris Deugau wrote: > Marc Perkel wrote: > >I've been trying for a long time to get bayes/mysql to actually work. > >Running a dedicated server with MySQL. Several servers running SA > >configured to talk to it. > > > >I'm running big servers with lots of ra

Re: Bayes and MySQL - does it actually work?

2011-12-23 Thread Jernej Porenta
On Dec 23, 2011, at 8:15 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote: > Am 23.12.2011 02:45, schrieb Marc Perkel: This is handling ~250K messages/day, although with some tweaks to serialize mail delivery a little more to level off the extreme peaks in messages/second it should probably be able to h