* Lars Ebeling :
> >You are not sending spam. Someone on the machine SR1S4.mesa.gmu.edu
> >[129.174.112.124 connected to your machine and said:
> >
> >HELO leopg9.no-ip.org
> >
> >In other words, the HELO domain was faked. We automatically block mail
> >from anyone who HELOs as our machine (unles
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 23:13:43 +0100
"Lars Ebeling" wrote:
We automatically block mail from anyone who HELOs as our machine
(unless it really *is* from our machine, of course!)
how do you do that?
We use MIMEDefang which lets you code tests like t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/23/2011 4:23 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 23:13:43 +0100 "Lars Ebeling"
> wrote:
>
>>> We automatically block mail from anyone who HELOs as our
>>> machine (unless it really *is* from our machine, of course!)
>
>> how do you
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 23:13:43 +0100
"Lars Ebeling" wrote:
> > We automatically block mail from anyone who HELOs as our machine
> > (unless it really *is* from our machine, of course!)
> how do you do that?
We use MIMEDefang which lets you code tests like that in Perl.
(So this is done outside of
- Original Message -
From: "David F. Skoll"
To:
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 10:14 PM
Subject: Re: Am i sending spam?
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 22:10:22 +0100
"Lars Ebeling" wrote:
http://pastebin.com/78gUdaCj
You are not sending spam. Someone on the machine
SR1S4.mesa.gmu.edu [
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, David B Funk wrote:
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 22:10:22 +0100
"Lars Ebeling" wrote:
http://pastebin.com/78gUdaCj
You are not sending spam. Someone on the machine
SR1S4.mesa.gmu.edu [129.174.112.124 connected to your machine and
sai
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 22:10:22 +0100
"Lars Ebeling" wrote:
http://pastebin.com/78gUdaCj
You are not sending spam. Someone on the machine
SR1S4.mesa.gmu.edu [129.174.112.124 connected to your machine and
said:
HELO leopg9.no-ip.org
In other
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 22:10:22 +0100
"Lars Ebeling" wrote:
> http://pastebin.com/78gUdaCj
You are not sending spam. Someone on the machine
SR1S4.mesa.gmu.edu [129.174.112.124 connected to your machine and
said:
HELO leopg9.no-ip.org
In other words, the HELO domain was faked. We automat
http://pastebin.com/78gUdaCj
--
Med vänliga hälsningar/Regards
Lars Ebeling
Rentier
http://leopg9.no-ip.org
"I am not young enough to know everything."
-- Oscar Wilde
I am going to update the original bug with patch.
Ill have mark look at it first.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
SECNAP Network Security
-Original message-
From: "dar...@chaosreigns.com"
To: Michael Scheidell
Cc: "users@spamassassin.apache.org"
Sent: Fri, Dec 23, 2011 17:28:28 GMT+00:00
S
On 12/23, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> #2, bug.. yep, bug. Vernon (author of DCC) will investigate and fix
> it, and update the SA BUGzilla soon.
> (so, yes, this would be a bug in 3.4 if released, but only shows up
> under one certain condition)
Please post the bug to https://issues.apache.org/Spa
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, spamassas...@lists.grepular.com wrote:
On 23/12/11 14:25, David F. Skoll wrote:
The only downside to CDB is that incremental updates are not possible.
To train, you need to rebuild the entire CDB file. For us, that's
an acceptable tradeoff, but YMMV.
Another major downs
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 03:03:09PM +, spamassas...@lists.grepular.com wrote:
> On 23/12/11 14:20, Henrik K wrote:
>
> >> As I understand it, if the MySQL query cache is tuned appropriately,
> >> then most of the queries should not be touching disk anyway?
> >
> > Enabling query cache will pro
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 15:05:42 +
spamassas...@lists.grepular.com wrote:
> Another major downside to this approach compared to using MySQL, is
> that it doesn't allow you to access the same bayes db from multiple
> machines at the same time. Unless I'm mistaken..?
You're correct. We rsync the C
On 23/12/11 14:25, David F. Skoll wrote:
> The only downside to CDB is that incremental updates are not possible.
> To train, you need to rebuild the entire CDB file. For us, that's
> an acceptable tradeoff, but YMMV.
Another major downside to this approach compared to using MySQL, is that
it do
On 23/12/11 14:20, Henrik K wrote:
>> As I understand it, if the MySQL query cache is tuned appropriately,
>> then most of the queries should not be touching disk anyway?
>
> Enabling query cache will probably (marginally) slow things down. Bayes
> queries are extremely random, so there's nothing
I don't believe any kind of SQL database is the best choice for Bayes
(which involves simple keyed lookups). We use Dan Bernsteins "cdb"
file format with great success. Each user has his or her own CDB file
as well as a sitewide file containing 5.7 million tokens.
The CDB software uses mmap() to
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 02:10:16PM +, spamassas...@lists.grepular.com wrote:
> On 23/12/11 11:29, Henrik K wrote:
>
> >> Performance with the database on physical disks simply wasn't
> >> keeping up with more than about double the average message rate (if
> >> that...), so I fell back to the "
On 23/12/11 11:29, Henrik K wrote:
>> Performance with the database on physical disks simply wasn't
>> keeping up with more than about double the average message rate (if
>> that...), so I fell back to the "good enough" setup of putting the
>> SA database on a RAMdisk,
> I guess it still boils do
On 12/22/11 9:44 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 12/22, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
The author did say "I believe it is entirely upward compatible." in
November, which was well after the DCC 1.3.140 release, so it probably
works.
I'd be interested to hear how that works if you try it. Mi
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 13:29:00 +0200, Henrik K wrote:
Since these issues pop up here every now and then, I guess SA needs
own
tutorial/howto for MySQL tuning..
google mysqltuner was a help for me even i have not much trafic here
http://www.google.dk/search?aq=f&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=mysql
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 01:10:27PM -0500, Kris Deugau wrote:
> Marc Perkel wrote:
> >I've been trying for a long time to get bayes/mysql to actually work.
> >Running a dedicated server with MySQL. Several servers running SA
> >configured to talk to it.
> >
> >I'm running big servers with lots of ra
On Dec 23, 2011, at 8:15 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 23.12.2011 02:45, schrieb Marc Perkel:
This is handling ~250K messages/day, although with some tweaks to
serialize mail delivery a little more to level off the extreme peaks in
messages/second it should probably be able to h
23 matches
Mail list logo