On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 19:17:36 +0100
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > You haven't quoted any rules that are firing inappropriately. Do you
> > have any evidence that this is anything to do with Spamassassin or
> > reverse dns?
>
> ...because it is NOT my spamassassin which reject MY mails.
So there's
>
>> This sagrey plugin sounds great, I'm giving it a try now. Thanks for
>> the info.
>
> I'd be wary about that. Personally, the FPs I've had in the past have
> overwhelmingly "first contact".
I've been giving it a whirl and adjusted the score down a little bit..
So far, it's been doing gr
Hello Joe Sniderman,
Am 2012-02-24 18:45:52, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> > c) Public mail server mail.tamay-dogan.net (78.47.247.21)
> > d) Receiving mail server
> So far, so good.
> > If now d) is runing spamassassin, thaen my messages are to 90% rejected.
> Strange. What
Hello Bowie Bailey,
Am 2012-02-24 12:42:02, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> Why not? It doesn't have to be specific. "public41.tamay-dogan.net"
> would work fine. What is the downside of having a rDNS entry?
...because my ISP @office (Alice) offer only fixed IP (85.182.220.41)
with only b
Hello RW,
Am 2012-02-24 14:00:11, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> As far as positive scoring rules are concerned, Spamassassin should only
> care about the reverse dns of the last external relay, and
> mail.tamay-dogan.net has impeccable dns.
Right, and it was a problem with spamassassin on a
