Hi!
I'm not sure if false positives should be reported here or in bugzilla.
If I choosen wrong place please let me know.
Innocent phrase in Polish language brakuje Ci aliasów[1] triggers
rules mentioned above.
[1] - it means: [...] you are missing aliases [...]
Regards,
Marcin
On 10/18/2013 03:07 PM, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
Hi!
I'm not sure if false positives should be reported here or in bugzilla.
If I choosen wrong place please let me know.
Innocent phrase in Polish language brakuje Ci aliasów[1] triggers
rules mentioned above.
[1] - it means: [...] you are missing
W dniu 18.10.2013 15:23, Axb pisze:
On 10/18/2013 03:07 PM, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
Hi!
I'm not sure if false positives should be reported here or in bugzilla.
If I choosen wrong place please let me know.
Innocent phrase in Polish language brakuje Ci aliasów[1] triggers
rules mentioned above.
I'm searching a way to give some extra Score depending on the Number
of Recipients in the To: Headerline. In the last days there are
massive Spamruns that are not marked as Spam - but all of them have
a lot of Recipient Mail-Adresses in the To-Line (the last one more
than 50..). I didn't found
On 10/18/2013 04:04 PM, Lutz Petersen wrote:
I'm searching a way to give some extra Score depending on the Number
of Recipients in the To: Headerline. In the last days there are
massive Spamruns that are not marked as Spam - but all of them have
a lot of Recipient Mail-Adresses in the To-Line
On 10/18/2013 10:04 AM, Lutz Petersen wrote:
I'm searching a way to give some extra Score depending on the Number
of Recipients in the To: Headerline. In the last days there are
massive Spamruns that are not marked as Spam - but all of them have
a lot of Recipient Mail-Adresses in the To-Line
At 02:56 15-10-2013, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
In both cases the last two Received: headers in each message are
forgeries as no SMTP transaction occurred. I'm sure this violates more
than one SMTP RFC, but I doubt Gmane will change the way they do this
any time soon.
I don't think that there is
On 10/18/2013 03:34 PM, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
W dniu 18.10.2013 15:23, Axb pisze:
On 10/18/2013 03:07 PM, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
Hi!
I'm not sure if false positives should be reported here or in bugzilla.
If I choosen wrong place please let me know.
Innocent phrase in Polish language brakuje
Dear sir
is possible to specify a whitelist_from in local.cf limiting it for some
hosts?
Example:
i want to whitelist my postmas...@foo.tld to avoid backscatter or
bouce_message classifications, but want to limit this whitelist only if the
sender is from my server, if the smtp client is
nik600 skrev den 2013-10-18 17:24:
Can i do that?
sure:
whitelist_auth postmas...@example.org
whitelist_from allow forges, dont use it, its still candidate to be
removed from spamassassin
On 18.10.13 17:24, nik600 wrote:
is possible to specify a whitelist_from in local.cf limiting it for some
hosts?
yes, use whitelist_from_rcvd for that.
Note that applies to external mail, e.g. mail received from hosts not in
your internal_network.
i want to whitelist my postmas...@foo.tld to
nik600 wrote:
is possible to specify a whitelist_from in local.cf http://local.cf
limiting it for some hosts?
Example:
i want to whitelist my postmas...@foo.tld to avoid backscatter or
bouce_message classifications, but want to limit this whitelist only if
the sender is from my server,
On Fri, 18 Oct 2013, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 10/18/2013 10:04 AM, Lutz Petersen wrote:
I'm searching a way to give some extra Score depending on the Number
of Recipients in the To: Headerline. In the last days there are
massive Spamruns that are not marked as Spam - but all of them have
I'm trying to write a rule that gives some spamminess score to messages
received from any host that resolves to protection.outlook.com.
I tried to use _REMOTEHOSTNAME_ to do this, but I think I got the header syntax
wrong.
Can someone set me straight?
Thanks,
-Philip
14 matches
Mail list logo