Amir Caspi ceph...@3phase.com wrote on 01/29/2014 11:08:18 AM:
From: Amir Caspi ceph...@3phase.com
To: Andy Jezierski ajezier...@stepan.com,
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org users@spamassassin.apache.org
Date: 01/29/2014 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: Help with a regex to catch spam with gibberish
On 1/30/2014 11:23 AM, Andy Jezierski wrote:
Amir Caspi ceph...@3phase.com wrote on 01/29/2014 11:08:18 AM:
From: Amir Caspi ceph...@3phase.com
To: Andy Jezierski ajezier...@stepan.com,
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org users@spamassassin.apache.org
Date: 01/29/2014 11:08 AM
Subject: Re:
On Jan 30, 2014, at 10:28 AM, Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com wrote:
If you want to share the complete rule, I can throw it into my sandbox and
see what masscheck thinks as well.
The complete rule would be something like this, assuming Andy implemented it as
I wrote it:
rawbody
Amir Caspi ceph...@3phase.com wrote on 01/30/2014 11:39:51 AM:
From: Amir Caspi ceph...@3phase.com
To: Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com,
Cc: Andy Jezierski ajezier...@stepan.com,
users@spamassassin.apache.org users@spamassassin.apache.org
Date: 01/30/2014 11:40 AM
Subject: Re: Help with
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Amir Caspi wrote:
On Jan 30, 2014, at 10:28 AM, Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com wrote:
If you want to share the complete rule, I can throw it into my sandbox and see
what masscheck thinks as well.
The complete rule would be something like this, assuming Andy
On Jan 30, 2014, at 11:25 AM, John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org wrote:
I'd suggest writing it as a subrule first, to see how well it performs
against the masscheck corpora. If it does well by itself (good hits, high
S/O), then a meta can be added to expose it for scoring. If it hits a lot but
On 1/30/2014 1:25 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Amir Caspi wrote:
On Jan 30, 2014, at 10:28 AM, Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com
wrote:
If you want to share the complete rule, I can throw it into my
sandbox and see what masscheck thinks as well.
The complete rule would be
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 1/30/2014 1:25 PM, John Hardin wrote:
I'd suggest writing it as a subrule first, to see how well it performs
against the masscheck corpora. If it does well by itself (good hits, high
S/O), then a meta can be added to expose it for scoring. If
On 1/30/2014 12:39 PM, Amir Caspi wrote:
On Jan 30, 2014, at 10:28 AM, Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com
mailto:kmcgr...@pccc.com wrote:
If you want to share the complete rule, I can throw it into my
sandbox and see what masscheck thinks as well.
The complete rule would be something like
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Amir Caspi wrote:
On Jan 30, 2014, at 10:28 AM, Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com wrote:
If you want to share the complete rule, I can throw it into my sandbox
and see what masscheck thinks as well.
The complete rule would be something like this, assuming Andy
10 matches
Mail list logo
