On 17.05.14 14:11, Jeff Mincy wrote:
It would have been easier to figure out why it was matching if the
matching spf entry was printed out, for example something like this:
May 8 18:21:27.859 [22058] dbg: spf: whitelist_from_spf:
amandarodriq...@odysseyshop.ribsbuy.com matches ^.*\@.*buy\.com$
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 15:44:30 +0200
On 17.05.14 14:11, Jeff Mincy wrote:
It would have been easier to figure out why it was matching if the
matching spf entry was printed out, for example something like this:
May 8
That's a bad thing to do. A caching name server is pretty easy to implement
(all the distros that I've played with do it automatically just installing
bind). Many (most?/all?) RBLs require a subscription (read money) if you
exceed a certain number of queries. A public dns server can hammer
On Mon, 19 May 2014, Kevin Miller wrote:
That's a bad thing to do. A caching name server is pretty easy to
implement (all the distros that I've played with do it automatically
just installing bind). Many (most?/all?) RBLs require a subscription
(read money) if you exceed a certain number of
On Mon, 19 May 2014 10:46:25 -0800
Kevin Miller kevin_mil...@ci.juneau.ak.us wrote:
Ian Excellent point. I _used to_ run a local DNS cache, but got rid of
Ian it a few months ago, in the name of simplicity. Was that a good or
Ian bad thing to do in the current context?
Kevin That's a bad thing
On 2014-05-19 19:39, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
Ok, I installed a local bind instance on Saturday. But it is not
helping: out of about 100 spams I got today (counting both those that
got flagged and those that didn't, but not counting the horrible spams
with score 15 that go directly to /dev/null),
